Quote:
Originally Posted by bigguy1231
Hopefully they do. This was just absolute stupidity. Making the city more unaffordable and less desirable isn't going to help this city. We had 40 years of stagnation because of stupid decisions like this back in the 70's and we haven't learned from that. The reason all of our suburbs grew and thrived was because the city of Hamilton was hostile to development. Now it will happen again.
|
How was Hamilton hostile to development? Seems to me it was quite friendly to the same kind of suburban growth that was happening in Stoney Creek, Ancaster, Dundas, and Waterdown... much of that growth between Fennell and Rymal happened back then.
There was questionable governance. But the stagnation may have had
just a little to do with a restructuring city economy. Shrinkage and outright loss of big industry, and tens of thousands of jobs were lost along with it.
And each municipality had its own local planning and zoning, but it was all coordinated at the upper tier (Hamilton-Wentworth) once the region was created in 1974. This was no different from Halton, Peel, Durham, etc. The planning philosophies of the day gave us the suburbs we have, and the lack of recognition of the importance of intensification and infill (and its financial benefits) on properties in older central cities was also a factor in their stagnation.