HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #501  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2021, 6:55 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 40,799
Shediac was a big winner in this municipal reform package:

Town of Shediac will inherit:
– Local service district of Shediac Cape
– Local service district of Scoudouc Road
– Local service district of Pointe-du-Chêne
– Portion of the local service district of Scoudouc (95%)

The new town population will be 9,441.

It will be interesting to see how this affects the Moncton CMA boundaries. On the one hand, Scoudouc is currently part of the Moncton CMA, and it's inclusion in Shediac might tip commuting patterns sufficiently that all of Shediac will be incorporated into the Moncton CMA the next time around.

Alternatively, if the Shediac commuting watershed is not altered sufficiently enough for inclusion, then the Moncton CMA might actually lose a couple of thousand people.

It will be interesting to see if the Moncton CMA is +9,000 or -2,000 by the time of the 2026 census.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #502  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2021, 7:14 PM
MonctonianSentinel01's Avatar
MonctonianSentinel01 MonctonianSentinel01 is offline
I Rise Again
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Moncton
Posts: 596
I believe that we will be losing Salisbury and Dorchester as well. Although Salisbury might stay in depending on commuting patterns. It might mean that we gain on the Salisbury side of things. Also I believe that entity 32 we will probably still keep. Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #503  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2021, 7:24 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 40,799
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonianSentinel01 View Post
I believe that we will be losing Salisbury and Dorchester as well. Although Salisbury might stay in depending on commuting patterns. It might mean that we gain on the Salisbury side of things. Also I believe that entity 32 we will probably still keep. Thoughts?
The Moncton CMA extends deeply into western Albert County as it is (as far as Elgin), so I don't think we will be losing Salisbury, especially since Petitcodiac is staying independent. Salisbury is firmly within Moncton's commuter watershed.

Dorchester, like Sackville was never part of the Moncton CMA. Memramcook is, but Dorchester isn't.

CMAs are based on commuting patterns, and both Sackville and Dorchester have strong local employers limiting inter-regional commuting patterns (Dorchester Penitentiary and Mount Allison University).
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #504  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2021, 7:27 PM
MonctonianSentinel01's Avatar
MonctonianSentinel01 MonctonianSentinel01 is offline
I Rise Again
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Moncton
Posts: 596
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #505  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2021, 7:36 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 40,799


Sorry, my mistake.

I would agree with you then. The Moncton CMA is definitely at risk of losing Dorchester as an entity then. This would be 1,167 souls as per the last census.

I imagine the influence of Sackville is too large to allow the reverse situation and push Sackville into the Moncton CMA.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #506  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2021, 7:51 PM
Freddypop's Avatar
Freddypop Freddypop is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Go Pats!
Posts: 2,325
The mayor of Fredericton says that the changes will add 5500+ to the city population. Also of note is that YFC will now be part of the city which adds the largest property to the tax base from Lincoln. Most of the remainder of Lincoln is now part of Oromocto
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #507  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2021, 8:22 PM
MonctonianSentinel01's Avatar
MonctonianSentinel01 MonctonianSentinel01 is offline
I Rise Again
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Moncton
Posts: 596
@MonctonRad upon further review I think that we we'll keep Salisbury and the area above Moncton. Also I believe there is now an extremely good chance that Shediac will come into the fold. Hillsborough will be lost but I believe that we will eventually gain it back and that will also bring with it Alma and Riverside-Albert. Dorchester is more than likely probably gone for good.
@Freddypop that is great news! Glad that Freddy is profiting from this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #508  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2021, 9:19 PM
darkharbour darkharbour is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 785
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonianSentinel01 View Post
@MonctonRad upon further review I think that we we'll keep Salisbury and the area above Moncton. Also I believe there is now an extremely good chance that Shediac will come into the fold. Hillsborough will be lost but I believe that we will eventually gain it back and that will also bring with it Alma and Riverside-Albert. Dorchester is more than likely probably gone for good.
@Freddypop that is great news! Glad that Freddy is profiting from this.
All these CMA boundaries are a little wonky, there are statistical rationales, but they still rely on commuting patterns which are pretty loose these days. For example my first reaction is that you including Alma seems like a bit of a stretch since it's almost 1h 15m from Moncton, which would be like including St. Andrew's and St. Stephen to Saint John's CMA. But then again I know a lot of people that commute from the Biological Station to SJ, so again maybe we need to rethink our definitions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #509  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 12:33 AM
MonctonianSentinel01's Avatar
MonctonianSentinel01 MonctonianSentinel01 is offline
I Rise Again
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Moncton
Posts: 596
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkharbour View Post
All these CMA boundaries are a little wonky, there are statistical rationales, but they still rely on commuting patterns which are pretty loose these days. For example my first reaction is that you including Alma seems like a bit of a stretch since it's almost 1h 15m from Moncton, which would be like including St. Andrew's and St. Stephen to Saint John's CMA. But then again I know a lot of people that commute from the Biological Station to SJ, so again maybe we need to rethink our definitions.
It depends on where the population is if the majority of the population is on the Hillsborough side close to Riverview and there is 50% of the entire area of population that commutes to Moncton for work and that would bring it in regardless to how far it is away from Moncton. You have to look at the entity labeled 42. I doubt that Statscan will rethink it's definitions just because of lil old Moncton, or for N.B., but there are regional municipalities that are even worse across the nation.

Last edited by MonctonianSentinel01; Nov 19, 2021 at 1:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #510  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 2:22 PM
mylesmalley's Avatar
mylesmalley mylesmalley is offline
Moderator / Supervillain
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Moncton, NB
Posts: 4,101
I think overall I like the proposal. At a glance there are some decisions I find a bit odd though.

Just in the South East, for example:

- Why bother leaving two mostly empty unincorporated areas east and south of Memramcook? Why not just add them to one of the adjacent municipalities?

- Some municipalities as described are huge, but others it seems like they went out of their way to not expand. Without getting into the arguments about why the whole place wasn't merged into Moncton, why didn't Riverview get Lower Coverdale or Hillsborough? As it stands, it will be one of the smallest in the province.

- Why is Salisbury now responsible for more territory than Moncton? But Peticodiac is unchanged and surrounded by equally rural unincorporated areas?

- Why does Entity 32 exist at all? Why not split it between Shediac, Moncton and Salisbury?
__________________
"When you go home tonight, there's gonna be another story on your house! "
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #511  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 2:31 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 40,799


Good questions. I especially like your idea of extending Riverview down the Petitcodiac up to and including Hillsborough. If I was to guess as to a reason why the government did what it did, I suspect they wanted to give a population boost to the new municipality, since by far the majority of the people live in Hillsborough and environs, and not in Riverside-Albert or Alma. The new municipality needed this tax base to make a go of it.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #512  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 2:38 PM
adamuptownsj adamuptownsj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Saint John NB
Posts: 1,995
The odd spots to me are...

MegaNorton and MiniSussex. The former is waaaaay too large and the latter really small. What percentage of the RSC8 rural district population is within ten minutes of Sussex?

Hampton. Rothesay Parish (French Village) should have been added to Rothesay or Saint John instead of Hampton. The Kingston Peninsula should all be in either a new entity or the rural district.

The little L of rural district in the middle of Gloucester is odd.

I can't imagine St Andrews will be overjoyed about adding Bayside and Chamcook.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #513  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 4:03 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 40,799
Question:

Now that the era of unincorporated LSDs is coming to an end, what does this mean in the future regarding the possibility of municipal annexations?

In the past, it was relatively easy for a municipality to petition the provincial government to allow for expansion of a municipal boundary (if necessary) to allow for urban growth. Now that the cities will all be bounded by other municipalities, has this era come to an end???
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #514  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 4:32 PM
PEI highway guy PEI highway guy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Summerside, PE
Posts: 597
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
Question:

Now that the era of unincorporated LSDs is coming to an end, what does this mean in the future regarding the possibility of municipal annexations?

In the past, it was relatively easy for a municipality to petition the provincial government to allow for expansion of a municipal boundary (if necessary) to allow for urban growth. Now that the cities will all be bounded by other municipalities, has this era come to an end???
I was surprised Dalhousie was not lumped in with Campbellton, Atholville and Tide Head..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #515  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 4:35 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by PEI highway guy View Post
I was surprised Dalhousie was not lumped in with Campbellton, Atholville and Tide Head..
Didn't Atholville just go through the process of expanding its boundaries shortly before COVID? Or did I imagine that?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #516  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 4:45 PM
MonctonianSentinel01's Avatar
MonctonianSentinel01 MonctonianSentinel01 is offline
I Rise Again
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Moncton
Posts: 596
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
Question:

Now that the era of unincorporated LSDs is coming to an end, what does this mean in the future regarding the possibility of municipal annexations?

In the past, it was relatively easy for a municipality to petition the provincial government to allow for expansion of a municipal boundary (if necessary) to allow for urban growth. Now that the cities will all be bounded by other municipalities, has this era come to an end???
I would think that there would have to be an amalgamation of 2 or more entities combining together.

Also a note of interest. It was said in the CBC article that local government mergers will not need to be voted on by the population but need only be approved by a new provincial commission. To me that sounds like they are opening a lot of doors for future changes as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #517  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 4:48 PM
Smevo's Avatar
Smevo Smevo is offline
Sarcstic Caper in Exile
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Calgary
Posts: 3,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
Question:

Now that the era of unincorporated LSDs is coming to an end, what does this mean in the future regarding the possibility of municipal annexations?

In the past, it was relatively easy for a municipality to petition the provincial government to allow for expansion of a municipal boundary (if necessary) to allow for urban growth. Now that the cities will all be bounded by other municipalities, has this era come to an end???
I do expect it will be much harder, but not impossible as they didn't go with the mega-merger (full county) model that NS did in the 90s. I suspect some of the land in the Rural Districts would still be up for grabs for neighbouring urban municipalities, but it all hinges on how the new municipal entities are seen in the province's eyes, and what they see as more important - allowing Local Government Entities room to grow or protecting the Rural District's tax base. I'm assuming annexation of land from other Local Government Entities wouldn't be possible, with only amalgamation as an option for incorporating these areas into the larger town/city.
__________________
Just another Caper in Alberta...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #518  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2021, 6:34 PM
theshark's Avatar
theshark theshark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Northern N.-B.
Posts: 1,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
Didn't Atholville just go through the process of expanding its boundaries shortly before COVID? Or did I imagine that?
Yap, They just did the whole process.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #519  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2021, 4:09 PM
Nashe's Avatar
Nashe Nashe is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Moncton, NB
Posts: 3,025
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #520  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2021, 5:24 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Fredericton adding a bunch of rural LSDs to its population base is great but I don't really think there's much argument about what the larger 'city' is between the two...

These sorts of number-measuring contests are great clickbait for CBC, though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Atlantic Provinces
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:58 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.