Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere
That bold "impossible" change won't do anything. All it'll do is make market housing all that much more expensive as 200,000 units are removed from the market overnight and make your well-being be subject to a housing lottery as you either get stuck with insane market housing or highly subsidized public housing.
If the plan was to construct 200,000 *new* subsidized housing units, that is real change that would help. But even that isn't going to help people realize the dream of an owned detached dwelling, or even an owned dwelling in general.
The only solution is frigtons of supply, and no politician wants to propose that as we have built 50 years of planning knowledge and institutional requirements for extensive consultation with NIMBYs and people have an idea stuck in their head that they get to say what their neighbours can do with their properties.
|
In principle, I agree with your point.
But it actually ignored the original point I was making.
That is; Berlin solution is an "impossible" proposal. But the terms were made, the effort put in, and an "impossible" mission was brought to fruition. I agree, we can definitely debate if it will have the intended consequences, but that's a separate matter.
An apt comparison would be - Millennials declare a strike and demand referendum to suspend all zoning and permitting restrictions until 500,000 new family size housing units are started. (or something like that, I came up with that in 8 seconds)
Sounds ridiculous and impossible? That's the point. So was the Berlin proposal.
But there is no will in Canada beyond keyboard rage and working around the far margins of the problem. No ambition to create a societal change. Were unbelievably timid in the face of a decade long housing crisis.