HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2021, 3:32 PM
sjk sjk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldenBoot View Post
Actually, if my memory serves me correctly, when Cielo took control of this development, they proposed two towers. This is the first one. At that time, they described this Tower 1 to be a roughly 50-story office tower. Well, that ~50-story tower is now 44 stories.

They can still build a roughly 900k SF Tower 2 (probably in the neighborhood of 60 stories).

NOTE: The zig-zag balcony aesthetic on the north façade is interesting. Wish they would have done that to the south façade too. Looking forward to see some actual renderings before making further judgement on design. However, I'm not expecting much. Cielo does not have a good track record with design.
Ah okay - that's some good news, at least! Thanks for the reminder
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2021, 2:28 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,601
I suppose that, once again, I should be grateful that we're getting a 650'+ building anywhere in the CBD. But you know, if you spend the time and capital to pull together a full unencumbered city block that's going to be looming over a premier transit corridor . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
The new elevations are not as grand as the original project. But this is still a nice sized skyscraper at 44-stories and 656'. The mechanical/crown is equivalent to three more floors.



https://studio.bluebeam.com/share/b47zb2
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2021, 3:24 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,585
So this is really like a 20 story building with 20 stories of parking. bleh
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2021, 5:25 PM
MichaelB MichaelB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North edge of Downtown
Posts: 3,267
I am not grateful at all for generic buildings.....
it's a box.
groundbreaking.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2021, 5:33 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,585
Uhm did anyone else notice that the north side of the building is a 20 story concrete wall?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2021, 5:41 PM
ILUVSAT's Avatar
ILUVSAT ILUVSAT is offline
May the Schwartz be w/ U!
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Nomadic
Posts: 1,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaven View Post
Uhm did anyone else notice that the north side of the building is a 20 story concrete wall?
Isn't that Cielo Development's M.O.?!? They are god-awful with design (specifically with their garage levels).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2021, 6:05 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaven View Post
Uhm did anyone else notice that the north side of the building is a 20 story concrete wall?
Facing, eventually, their second tower, fwiw.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2021, 8:56 PM
myBrain myBrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 710
Pretty cool how this plain box is going to block eastern views of our most iconic building, right guys? Instead of Frost, we get -- a slab!

This is trash, back to the drawing board please.

And if it's going to stay the same design, tbh I'd rather they cut the height in half so Frost towers above it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2021, 10:01 PM
mercury6's Avatar
mercury6 mercury6 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 191
I can accept most 600'+ but a 20 story concrete wall is disappointing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2021, 10:49 PM
AJB AJB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 15
Ajb

I have to agree with Mercury 6, a solid wall is disappointing as well as a flat roof. I think all buildings going forward should be required to do something unique with the rooflines and not make them flat. San Diego is a great example of buildings with unique rooflines.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Sep 7, 2021, 11:10 PM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,438
I think we should have as few design restrictions as possible. The Design Commission has enough power as it is, imagine them getting to decide if a building's roofline was unique enough...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Sep 8, 2021, 12:16 AM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
Member since 2001
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Terra Firma
Posts: 3,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by Echostatic View Post
I think we should have as few design restrictions as possible. The Design Commission has enough power as it is, imagine them getting to decide if a building's roofline was unique enough...
Totally agree.

And crowns in San Diego are not required or approved by the city. It's a bigger market with a height cap (500'). The only way to differentiate ones building from another is altering crown aesthetics.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2021, 10:46 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,832
This one got taller according to backup files filed for the 10/25 DC meeting. But there are no renderings which is unusual. Anyway it's 705' and 50-stories.

http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=369728
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2021, 11:21 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,601
700' is the new plateau.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2021, 11:29 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,832
I suspect they will show renderings at the meeting. Be prepared for fuzzy screen shots on Monday.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2021, 11:40 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,832
I think we might see some renderings on Friday.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2021, 10:15 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,832

Last edited by The ATX; Oct 21, 2021 at 10:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2021, 10:18 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,320
Gorgeous material use.

Don't judge a building by its elevation drawings.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2021, 10:19 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,832
This should please some of the critics on here, Five ground floor restaurant/retail spots:


http://www.austintexas.gov/edims/document.cfm?id=369860
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Oct 21, 2021, 10:24 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,832
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:53 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.