Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Hill
Call me weird but I like Brooks Tower. It’s dark, slender, and tall. Reminds me of the East Coast for some reason.
|
Fair enough. For me, personally, it's the "East Coast" look that I dislike, but to each their own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Hill
As for the 325’ thing, I think - in fact I know, because I was following it so closely - they were thinking in terms of stories. 325 feet is approximately 30 stories (for residential at least).
|
Ah, that makes sense. I still disagree with the outcome, but I can see where they're coming from.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brainpathology
Maybe I'm confused now. I thought it was slated for behind the pavilions too.. but that's alone 15th no? One of the oldest sets of proposals.. but still undeveloped.
I just reread my post... I missed a sentence I thought I typed about the fact that my hotel room overlooked the back of the pavilions right onto that block that Trango Tower was proposed on (I am also getting OLD). My post reads as if I did in fact claim that Trango was proposed for 162, which you're correct it was not.
|
Thanks for clearing that up. I dunno where I got the belief that the Trango would have been on 162, but I stand corrected now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus
Remember all the shouting matches about whether Trango Tower or the Miami Four Seasons was better? Well, we found out, didn't we 
|
I wasn't around for those, but hearing about them now, they must have been something to watch.
Though the Miami Four Seasons looks pretty good (minus the awful parking section), I daresay better than the Panorama Tower that dethroned it as Florida's tallest, and I wouldn't mind it if someone just copied-and-pasted that design and built one here. Maybe if someone built the main tower portion, minus the parking section and the office-wing, on the Trango lot, and built a separate parking and office tower on the other Brookfield Pavilions lot (connected by skybridge to the main tower, and with the parking portion covered up by glass, like they did for 162 and 1144)... one can dream.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam Hill
I remember Trango Tower. I remember seeing these ridiculous renderings of some absurd shard reaching 1000’ into the sky. The idea of this bizarre, gigantic monolith straight out of 2001 A Space Odyssey actually getting built and towering over Denver was unthinkable to me. For a while there I actually thought it was a hoax. I’m not sure how serious that proposal ever actually was but, thank god that thing never got built.
|
To be fair, given all the weirdly-shaped skyscrapers now being built all over NYC, China, the Middle East, or, hell, even in Austin, some might say Trango Tower's design was ahead of its time.
Though I do agree, it would have looked quite out-of-place and out-of-character for late 90's / early 2000's Denver (even the Miami Four Seasons would have looked much better on that site). I think that 650 17th (both the original 1000' proposal from a few years ago and the newer, downsized proposal) looks far better and more suitable for our city.