Quote:
Originally Posted by mstar
I have noticed that projects in Salt Lake usually do get scaled back by the time they are built. Some recent examples - 95 S. State was originally planed to be the city's new tallest structure at 28 stories. Then it got cut to 26 stories then to it's final height at 25. The CCH, in it's original plan was also supposed to be the tallest building in Utah with a conceptual 39 stories. Then when the final site was selected, it got cut to 30 stories, then to 28 stories and now is supposed to be 26. I hope that the Astra Tower doesn't get scaled back like this.
|
Just a couple of updates here:
95 South State was originally only 19 stories. It was raised to 25 stories after 111 South Main was completed. The speed of 111 S Main filling up spurred 95 South State ahead of its original plan and increased the overall size.
CCH as originally planned by the current development group was only going to be around 370 feet. The plan was to fit within the D1/D4 Overlay Zone of 375' max height. The height was reduced due to wanting to keep all parking for the CCH below grade. This allowed for a larger ballroom and additional meeting space. Additionally, this reduced parking also helped to spur the County to work with The Ritchie Group to include additional parking in Phase 2 of The West Quarter (Block 67). It is my understanding that all 3 towers will go up at once now rather than the Residential and Hotel happening first and the Commercial (375') happening later.
We have had a few projects that have gone through revisions and ended up with more height than originally planned. Peirpoint Apartments, 95 West (CCC), and The Regent (CCC not originally planned) all come to mind. Sure, we lost height on the Cascade but the increase in density from The Regent and the increase in height for 95 W make up for a lot of this.
I do think that SLC is primarily over the hump with regards to height reductions during the initial phases of the projects.