HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2021, 8:54 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Whats wrong with keeping the original loop for the exit going westbound drawn in red
I can speculate...

(1) larger radius curve is safer for traffic that has exited the freeway and is slowing down from high speed,

(2) tighter radius curve for traffic joining 232nd northbound forces the traffic to slow down and this might be intended to make the merge there safer
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2021, 10:30 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,697
...and they can add some land to the "returned to green space" column on the spreadsheet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2021, 10:32 PM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
I can speculate...

(1) larger radius curve is safer for traffic that has exited the freeway and is slowing down from high speed,

(2) tighter radius curve for traffic joining 232nd northbound forces the traffic to slow down and this might be intended to make the merge there safer
Of course it forces drivers to slow down. The design speed of the ramp has been severely reduced. All in the name of value engineering
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2021, 12:38 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
...and they can add some land to the "returned to green space" column on the spreadsheet.
You are so right on what this really is; just a number on a spreadsheet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2021, 1:57 AM
mattropolis's Avatar
mattropolis mattropolis is offline
matt in the city
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BC
Posts: 393
They could sell off the land where the loops are being removed and make some money. Like at 200th
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2021, 2:31 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,976
It’s fine for this interchange. High speed free flow ramps are only needed between two major arteries, which this is not.

The upgraded 264th and Highway 11 / Sumas interchanges on the other hand better have more substantial ramp systems.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2021, 2:42 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by libtard View Post
Of course it forces drivers to slow down. The design speed of the ramp has been severely reduced. All in the name of value engineering
"Value engineering" would leave the ramp as is. "Safety" seems the more likely motive to me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Sep 5, 2021, 2:20 AM
NicholasHui NicholasHui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 39
They said that starting September 7 of this year, they are going to do lane closures during the night 8:30 p.m. to 5:30 a.m during Weekdays, 8:30 p.m. to 8 a.m during Weekends
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Oct 17, 2021, 6:43 PM
Jimbo604 Jimbo604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,888
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/trans...y-highway1/highway1-216th-264th-widening

Advanced works:
- Pre-clearing work completed winter 2021
- Single structural test pile at 232nd Interchange in early spring 2021
- Preloading of new HOV lanes in the median to commence summer 2021

Did that preloading get started?

Schedule:
- Functional design was completed in winter 2020
- Preliminary construction works begin in spring 2021
- Detailed design to be completed in early 2022
- Construction will begin in 2022
- Construction to be completed in 2025
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Oct 18, 2021, 5:14 PM
scottN scottN is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
"Value engineering" would leave the ramp as is. "Safety" seems the more likely motive to me.
Actually there's no merge here since the ramp goes into a dedicated lane on 232nd street so doubt the rationale is vehicle safety. Maybe pedestrian / cyclist saftety? But if that was the priority why not just get rid of the slip lane entirely and make it a fully signalized right turn?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Oct 23, 2021, 8:29 AM
cleowin cleowin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 53
I'm confused by this, are they not making the short merge lane a proper length merge lane as part of this project on both sides? they are ridiculously short. how about the yield before going onto the on-ramp? It appears with the new design, they're just going with a half cloverleaf, but the exit ramps will continue to drive straight through. They should be designed like every other interchange on highway 1.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Jan 4, 2022, 7:07 PM
Jimbo604 Jimbo604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,888
Gov Project Website link

Schedule
Functional design was completed in winter 2020
Preliminary construction works begin in spring 2021
Detailed design to be completed in early 2022
Construction will begin in 2022
Construction to be completed in 2025

Yay, now we can say construction to start THIS year and then three years to fill in a median.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2022, 2:58 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo604 View Post
Yay, now we can say construction to start THIS year and then three years to fill in a median.
It boggles one's mind how they built the entire Coquihalla Highway to Merritt in 20 months with 80s technology but basically filling few kilometres of grass median takes three years. I could do that in three years with a wheel barrel and a shovel!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2022, 4:46 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
It boggles one's mind how they built the entire Coquihalla Highway to Merritt in 20 months with 80s technology but basically filling few kilometres of grass median takes three years. I could do that in three years with a wheel barrel and a shovel!
It's a lot easier to build a brand spanking new highway than it is to upgrade one that's already in place while minimizing the impact on existing traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2022, 5:33 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,407
Yeah, there's a lot of orange cones to put up and move around.

Even if they take one lane off each way every night, they should still be able to build this short stretch in months, not years. I know that there is more than the median involved, but this is a really short stretch with easy ground conditions. I would give them three years if they would be building all the way to Abbotsford but no.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2022, 7:45 AM
Tvisforme's Avatar
Tvisforme Tvisforme is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 2,152
Isn't it a bit more than just adding lanes? The project web page lists several parts to the project, and we don't know if the lanes will need the full period to be complete (as with the stages in North Vancouver):
  • Widen Highway 1 to accommodate eastbound and westbound high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes in the median between the 216 Street and 264 Street Interchanges
  • Construction of a new crossing at Glover Road, which will include dedicated 2.5-metre wide cycling lanes on either side and a separate two-metre wide sidewalk
  • Reconfiguration of the existing 232 Street Interchange and the replacement of the existing crossing, including a three-metre wide multi-use pathway on either side
  • Replacing the existing railway crossing immediately east of Glover Road

Also, as mentioned earlier in this discussion, the project calls for preloading in mid-2021; we don't know if that has started yet, and it can take quite some time to complete.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2022, 3:25 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
It boggles one's mind how they built the entire Coquihalla Highway to Merritt in 20 months with 80s technology but basically filling few kilometres of grass median takes three years. I could do that in three years with a wheel barrel and a shovel!
"Your community benefits at work", although now that I think of it, that sounds like an oxymoron.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2022, 8:18 PM
Mininari Mininari is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria (formerly Port Moody, then Winnipeg)
Posts: 2,447
Remember, "community" means people more than it means geography.

So a "community" of staunch NDP-supporters, unions, and orange cool-aid drinkers are going to be benefiting from every gold-plated, over-budget, reduced-scope project they build moving forward.

Its about to snow like its 1996... so yeah, feels like the return of the 90s!

/end political rant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2022, 7:45 AM
Nicholas Hui Nicholas Hui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 12
It appears that they started to do construction on the Highway median just east of Highway 1 232 st interchange. Before that, they had the trees cut down before that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2022, 8:47 AM
mezzanine's Avatar
mezzanine mezzanine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
It boggles one's mind how they built the entire Coquihalla Highway to Merritt in 20 months with 80s technology but basically filling few kilometres of grass median takes three years. I could do that in three years with a wheel barrel and a shovel!
Yeah, they fast-tracked the coquihalla, and assuredly, it came a price

i'll like the upgrades to Hwy 1 as much i like the coq, but then as in now, all this ain't easy
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:35 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.