HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4021  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2021, 11:05 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeCee View Post
Oh, don't kid yourself. You were never going to vote for the NDP anyways.
And how would you know that? I always vote but I have never been a single party voter and use my vote to either reward job well done or punish for stupid politics. The extra billion dollars wasted here could have gotten us SkyTrain all the way to UBC, as an example. The whole thing is beyond idiotic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4022  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2021, 9:06 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
Just for the record, the SkyTrain to UBC is $3.3 billion; the cost creep for the GMB so far is $0.9B.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4023  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2021, 10:47 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,394
Sure, but isn't the cost sharing model on these projects 33/33/33, so the billion dollars would have pretty much covered province's portion?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4024  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2021, 10:55 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,904
It doesn’t matter, either way it is a billion dollars that could have been used to fund more rail expansion or highway upgrades, such as twinning the #1.

Also for this higher price we are getting so much less.

Not to mention economic losses for waiting another decade or so.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4025  
Old Posted Aug 11, 2021, 11:46 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
I consider it a fair trade for getting both SkyTrains; if the Libs won, we'd probably be complaining about how the Langley line was five years late and slightly more expensive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Sure, but isn't the cost sharing model on these projects 33/33/33, so the billion dollars would have pretty much covered province's portion?
20/40/40 since 2017; 40% of $3.3B is about $1.3B, so not quite.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4026  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2021, 12:28 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
I consider it a fair trade for getting both SkyTrains; if the Libs won, we'd probably be complaining about how the Langley line was five years late and slightly more expensive.



20/40/40 since 2017; 40% of $3.3B is about $1.3B, so not quite.
If we got a delayed Broadway Line that was downgraded to a street level LRT at a higher cost, then yes I would call that an equal situation.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4027  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2021, 1:47 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
If we got a delayed Broadway Line that was downgraded to a street level LRT at a higher cost, then yes I would call that an equal situation.
That's an entirely possible future scenario.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4028  
Old Posted Aug 12, 2021, 3:18 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Sure, but isn't the cost sharing model on these projects 33/33/33, so the billion dollars would have pretty much covered province's portion?
I hope to see your support the next time Translink needs to raise taxes and fees to cover their portion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4029  
Old Posted Aug 16, 2021, 2:14 PM
Jimbo604 Jimbo604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,888
All the time next year in Delta/Ladner/Tsawwassen: "it would have been done by now!"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4030  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2021, 10:33 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,708
An update will be coming tomorrow at 11:30. [source]
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4031  
Old Posted Aug 17, 2021, 10:59 PM
Mininari Mininari is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria (formerly Port Moody, then Winnipeg)
Posts: 2,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo604 View Post
All the time next year in Delta/Ladner/Tsawwassen: "it would have been done by now!"
That would be epic on a billboard, a la that farmer who put the billboards up that said "tired of traffic?" "Thank these guys" (image of Horgan and Weaver Laughing).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4032  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 4:56 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanSpice View Post
An update will be coming tomorrow at 11:30. [source]
Election promises. Election promises everywhere.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4033  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 3:34 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Election promises. Election promises everywhere.
This seems to be a provincial announcement, unless there's a mystery Federal guest.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4034  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 4:15 PM
Mininari Mininari is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria (formerly Port Moody, then Winnipeg)
Posts: 2,446
I wouldn't be surprised. The critical missing piece of highway infrastructure in the Greater Victoria Region (The McKenzie Interchange) was cancelled by the 90's NDP (cost-cutting), delayed, deferred, snubbed, forgotten about without even a single package of 'band-aid' improvements like the tunnel has gotten for nearly 20 years before a pre-election spending spree by the Harper Conservatives showed up with a bucket of federal money and got it going.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4035  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 4:47 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,543
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mininari View Post
I wouldn't be surprised. The critical missing piece of highway infrastructure in the Greater Victoria Region (The McKenzie Interchange) was cancelled by the 90's NDP (cost-cutting), delayed, deferred, snubbed, forgotten about without even a single package of 'band-aid' improvements like the tunnel has gotten for nearly 20 years before a pre-election spending spree by the Harper Conservatives showed up with a bucket of federal money and got it going.
Just found out Trudeau is in town today, so, yeah.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4036  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 6:44 PM
makr3trkr makr3trkr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 593
Richmond News
August 18, 2021
New 8-lane Massey Tunnel coming 2030
B.C. government says construction on the new $4.15 [billion] crossing will begin in 2025, after a three and a half year environmental assessment

https://www.richmond-news.com/local-news/new-8-lane-massey-tunnel-coming-2030-4233163

"A new, $4.15 billion eight-lane tunnel will replace the aging George Massey crossing.

That’s the news announced this morning by the B.C. government at a technical briefing for media.

The new tunnel is expected to be built by 2030, replacing the Massey Tunnel, which was constructed in 1959."

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4037  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 7:20 PM
logicbomb logicbomb is offline
Joshua B.
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,191
$4.15 billion for a tunnel that provides only 6 all-purpose lanes. Really now?

When a bridge that was superior and would have provided navigational benefits up the Fraser River would have cost 3.5 billion at most, and be completed by the mid 2020's had the NDP not cancelled the project.

Seriously, **** right off.

This stupid thing will likely be faced with cost overruns and many of the interchanges will probably see little to no improvement. Essentially will make little difference in traffic in 10-15 years when Delta, Lader and Tsawwassen get further developed. Imagine they had gone with a 6 lane Port Mann Bridge over the 10 lane configuration we have now? Yeah.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4038  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 7:36 PM
Mininari Mininari is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria (formerly Port Moody, then Winnipeg)
Posts: 2,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by logicbomb View Post
$4.15 billion for a tunnel that provides only 6 all-purpose lanes. Really now?

When a bridge that was superior and would have provided navigational benefits up the Fraser River would have cost 3.5 billion at most, and be completed by the mid 2020's had the NDP not cancelled the project.

Seriously, **** right off.

This stupid thing will likely be faced with cost overruns and many of the interchanges will probably see little to no improvement. Essentially will make little difference in traffic in 10-15 years when Delta, Lader and Tsawwassen get further developed. Imagine they had gone with a 6 lane Port Mann Bridge over the 10 lane configuration we have now? Yeah.
Next election in 2024? Still possible for this political football to get kicked again... the only work we'll see prior to then is the 'band-aid' improvements to a few spots... maybe the new Steveston Interchange?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4039  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 7:41 PM
dharper dharper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Surrey
Posts: 282
Is there that many busses that use the tunnel to warrant having a separate bus only lane? You think it would be a Bus/HOV lane.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4040  
Old Posted Aug 18, 2021, 7:46 PM
logicbomb logicbomb is offline
Joshua B.
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by dharper View Post
Is there that many busses that use the tunnel to warrant having a separate bus only lane? You think it would be a Bus/HOV lane.
Probably a bus + 6 persons HOV lanes. You will probably have many cops stationed at each end of the tunnel making bank off people using those lanes.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mininari View Post
Next election in 2024? Still possible for this political football to get kicked again... the only work we'll see prior to then is the 'band-aid' improvements to a few spots... maybe the new Steveston Interchange?
I think it goes ahead anyways. The Mayors seem to love this idea.

This is what happens when too many chefs enter the kitchen. The Mayors could really give a rats ass about regional benefits. They just want to restrict traffic flow into their regions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.