Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123
Investment wise aren't average people naturally overexposed to their own local real estate market anyway, at least indirectly? For example let's say you're a real estate agent participating in the 80% of the local economy here that's RE based. If the housing market tanks you'll lose income from your job and the value of any local properties you bought will go down. It's like people who hold tons of shares of their employer.
I have a condo and it's hard to imagine even buying a bigger property here unless there is some significant shift. You have to pay so much more to upgrade even very modestly from a 2 BR. You could instead buy a whole house in another market. I think it would be far better to live for part of the year in say Mexico (which AFAICT allows remote work without authorization, unlike the US)) than to own a slightly bigger place in Vancouver. And of course this is just a healthy result of a market being super expensive, although I think it is bubbly around here.
I've considered other parts of BC too but all of BC is expensive for what it offers. The southeast of BC is nice and super expensive, and some rural areas are OK and still semi-expensive.
|
BC RE is very expensive in general, definitely agree. Dying logging towns are trading houses for $300,000. Its completely illogical.
It also has a rental market skewed way too far in direction of tenants.
I say this as both a landlord in BC, and renter in Vancouver.
Lastly, absolutely the property ladder in Vancouver is broken.
I had made a lot of equity from my first purchase in 2009. But its useless; the next step up to a SFH or townhouse is life changing expensive.
Best decision I ever made was making my equity liquid by selling out of Vancouver, renting here, and using that money to invest elsewhere.
As they always say, to each their own, but the idea behind spending every penny on housing just to own seems ridiculous to me. That's not living life.