HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5081  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 1:49 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Maybe the rendering is just not that flattering, but "nondescript" is the first word that comes to mind...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5082  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 3:19 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,732
Replacing an iconic building with something that resembles a convention centre.

I still think pouring several hundred million into rehab'ing the interior of the Saddledome is the better way to go here.

You already have the right location, and you retain what IMO is still a great building.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5083  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 3:26 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,772
*I bet it will function far better than the awkward Rogers Place circulation.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5084  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 3:57 PM
The Fisher Account's Avatar
The Fisher Account The Fisher Account is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bridgeland - Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,023
As a Calgarian... well... what the actual fuck is this shit
__________________
Follow me on Twitter - @Fisher_Account for Calgary construction and development updates
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5085  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 4:45 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
Replacing an iconic building with something that resembles a convention centre.

I still think pouring several hundred million into rehab'ing the interior of the Saddledome is the better way to go here.

You already have the right location, and you retain what IMO is still a great building.
The exterior probably needs a fair bit of work too. I was near it recently and I was surprised at how tired it looks close up. Although I suppose we are at the point where only the bare minimum is going into upkeep and maintenance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5086  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 4:59 PM
drew's Avatar
drew drew is online now
the first stamp is free
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hippyville, Winnipeg
Posts: 8,732
^ Even if the exterior needs work, it would still cost less to rehab the Saddledome versus building new.

I get the "shiny new toy" angle, and the fact new construction has easier to access revenue - but I think this whole plan is short sighted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5087  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 5:59 PM
jonny24 jonny24 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Caledonia, often in Hamilton and Norfolk
Posts: 1,669
I don't see what's wrong with it, myself, although t I thought the more square-ish renderings from last year looked a bit better.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5088  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 6:13 PM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,129
It looks kind of bland, but it's hard to say without seeing different angles.

I like the idea of an arena that doesn't scream "this is an arena!", and would rather it look like something that meshes in a little better with the rest of the area. Even if it looks like a convention centre - as long as it looks good.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5089  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 7:28 PM
HomeInMyShoes's Avatar
HomeInMyShoes HomeInMyShoes is offline
arf
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: File 13
Posts: 14,612
Even with this Calgary, you're ahead in the combined arena/library competition.
__________________

-- “We heal each other with kindness, gentleness and respect.” -- Richard Wagamese
-- “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” -- Dr. Seuss
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5090  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2021, 10:54 PM
thewave46 thewave46 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 3,530
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeInMyShoes View Post
Even with this Calgary, you're ahead in the combined arena/library competition.
Stantec Tower in Edmonton is still taller than anything Calgary has! (by 3m)

Maybe Calgary's just making it bland so the upmanship game can continue - they'll add some sort of tacky, easily replaceable trend-setting cladding so that they can outdo Edmonton at the last moment.

Who knows what Edmonton might have up their sleeve?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5091  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2021, 8:37 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by drew View Post
Replacing an iconic building with something that resembles a convention centre.

I still think pouring several hundred million into rehab'ing the interior of the Saddledome is the better way to go here.

You already have the right location, and you retain what IMO is still a great building.
I agree. The Saddledone is iconic. It screams "Calgary". This new arena proposal is nice, but could be anywhere in North America.

A major overhaul of the Saddledome would probably be cheaper and preserve a a Calgary landmark.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5092  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2021, 10:14 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
I’m sure it’s been shown already, but the city just approved the arena and released a preliminary render. It’s brutal in every sense, but at least the street front retail isn’t being value engineered out like many other arenas see, so maybe that’s the trade off?


I present you, the Calgary Ice Cream Sandwich!






Quote:
Originally Posted by thewave46 View Post
Stantec Tower in Edmonton is still taller than anything Calgary has! (by 3m)

Maybe Calgary's just making it bland so the upmanship game can continue - they'll add some sort of tacky, easily replaceable trend-setting cladding so that they can outdo Edmonton at the last moment.

Who knows what Edmonton might have up their sleeve?
Haha sweetie, one tall building doesn’t make a skyline. Calgary has 7 buildings taller than Edmonton’s 2nd tallest, and 20 taller than its 3rd tallest. There hasn’t been any competition between the two cities (especially architecture and urban design wise) in decades as it’s already been won. Other than the NHL of course.

Edit: damn I’m bitchy today
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.

Last edited by Chadillaccc; Jul 30, 2021 at 10:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5093  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2021, 10:49 PM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 25,618
It’s even worse from other angles. There is a massive blank wall facing 12th ave on the north side.

Our new convention centre is more interesting and cost less.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5094  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2021, 11:01 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
I don't think it's necessarily the worst thing in the world if the rink is a little plain. There is enough architectural excitement in Calgary that the arena can focus on function. Most rinks in Canada tend to go in that direction anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5095  
Old Posted Jul 30, 2021, 11:35 PM
ZeDgE ZeDgE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by O-tacular View Post
It’s even worse from other angles. There is a massive blank wall facing 12th ave on the north side.

Our new convention centre is more interesting and cost less.
Where are these other angles?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5096  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2021, 1:32 AM
ericmacm's Avatar
ericmacm ericmacm is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 923
I don't mind the look for the new arena. It looks average, but that doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing. I'm sure it will look more cohesive once we get some additional images that put it into a better context, as well as a more refined design later down the line.

In regards to the debate about replacing or renovating the Saddledome, the biggest issue with it is the proximity to the Bow River, and consequently, the flooding that happened back in 2013. The Saddledome is in a vulnerable spot for flooding (it appears to be at a lower elevation in comparison to the new location), which will likely be more frequent in the future with climate change happening, so it just doesn't make sense as a long-term location in regard to risk of future flooding. The flood in 2013 was pretty major and would have further reduced the lifespan of the structure despite the repairs (it'll never be back at 100% unless a full gut of the affected area is undertaken). A full internal rebuild to modern state-of-the-art spec like Climate Pledge Arena would absolutely work, but the price tag would likely be double or even triple what a new arena would cost ($1.15B USD for Climate Pledge vs $608M CAD for Calgary Events Centre), which wouldn't be palatable for the public purse.

It unfortunately just makes more sense to start over and build a new arena. I know it's an iconic structure for Calgary, but it clearly won't work well for the long-term with the price tag of extensive repairs and renovations, as well as being more vulnerable to future flood events that would result in even more repairs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5097  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2021, 2:30 AM
ZeDgE ZeDgE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericmacm View Post
I don't mind the look for the new arena. It looks average, but that doesn't necessarily have to be a bad thing. I'm sure it will look more cohesive once we get some additional images that put it into a better context, as well as a more refined design later down the line.

In regards to the debate about replacing or renovating the Saddledome, the biggest issue with it is the proximity to the Bow River, and consequently, the flooding that happened back in 2013. The Saddledome is in a vulnerable spot for flooding (it appears to be at a lower elevation in comparison to the new location), which will likely be more frequent in the future with climate change happening, so it just doesn't make sense as a long-term location in regard to risk of future flooding. The flood in 2013 was pretty major and would have further reduced the lifespan of the structure despite the repairs (it'll never be back at 100% unless a full gut of the affected area is undertaken). A full internal rebuild to modern state-of-the-art spec like Climate Pledge Arena would absolutely work, but the price tag would likely be double or even triple what a new arena would cost ($1.15B USD for Climate Pledge vs $608M CAD for Calgary Events Centre), which wouldn't be palatable for the public purse.

It unfortunately just makes more sense to start over and build a new arena. I know it's an iconic structure for Calgary, but it clearly won't work well for the long-term with the price tag of extensive repairs and renovations, as well as being more vulnerable to future flood events that would result in even more repairs.
Flooding is still a big risk on the new site. I think they were going to go with an inverted bowl design but due to the flood risk this is not happening now. Perhaps it wont sit so low into the ground like the saddledome does.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5098  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2021, 3:07 AM
Djeffery's Avatar
Djeffery Djeffery is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: London
Posts: 6,084
Wasn't one of the problems of the Saddledome the inability of the roof to support modern entertainment setups? Seems to be a rather difficult thing to simply fix in a renovation. Whereas in Seattle, the roof of the Key Arena was the only thing kept the new arena was basically built under it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5099  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2021, 3:42 AM
ZeDgE ZeDgE is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djeffery View Post
Wasn't one of the problems of the Saddledome the inability of the roof to support modern entertainment setups? Seems to be a rather difficult thing to simply fix in a renovation. Whereas in Seattle, the roof of the Key Arena was the only thing kept the new arena was basically built under it.
Yep, I doubt it would cost much less to get the saddledome up to par.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5100  
Old Posted Jul 31, 2021, 2:38 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,483
I noticed that York Lions stadium, home of the CanPL's York United, no longer has a track surrounding the field.

I was under the impression that this stadium was specifically built to serve as an athletics venue. I take it that's no longer the case and that it's now exclusively a soccer/football stadium? If so, what are the main athletics venues in the GTA?

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:08 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.