HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2020, 4:25 PM
IluvATX IluvATX is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
I guess we're pretending that this one is still happening.



This one looks a lot better when we aren’t only comparing it to the shoebill rendering. I like the shingled design of the facade.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2020, 7:06 PM
JACKinBeantown's Avatar
JACKinBeantown JACKinBeantown is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,322
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2020, 9:36 PM
migol24 migol24 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2O View Post
It's really not on the waterfront though. It is only so visible in that limited view angle because there is a lot of low-rise stuff around the convention center. Once some of that gets infilled with taller buildings, the waterfront view will not seem so prominent.
In either case, it's kinda growing on me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2020, 10:11 PM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,502
Quote:
Originally Posted by migol24 View Post
In either case, it's kinda growing on me.
I hope its benign, the growth I mean. Glad you caught it early, it can still be cured. My thoughts are with you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2020, 10:15 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,846
I love this building and y’all are all being grinches. The facade has texture and this one does a tremendous job hiding parking and incorporating its balconies into the aesthetic of the design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2020, 10:23 PM
Geographer Geographer is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 136
I think it's ugly. I hate cantilevers because they look unstable. There create unconscious tension which makes hurt the experience of admiring a skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2020, 10:58 PM
WestAustinite's Avatar
WestAustinite WestAustinite is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 248
This design reminds me of a Trojan Horse...not in a good way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2020, 11:22 PM
migol24 migol24 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by the Genral View Post
I hope its benign, the growth I mean. Glad you caught it early, it can still be cured. My thoughts are with you.
Haha... Thanks?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2020, 4:28 AM
Syndic's Avatar
Syndic Syndic is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,980
Yeah that design needs some work. Maybe add some white lines? A spire is always a crowd-pleaser.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2020, 3:03 PM
ahealy's Avatar
ahealy ahealy is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,847


Someone say spire...?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2020, 4:53 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,601
No likey. It's a 700+ ft (lightly patterned) monolith that blocks out the healing light of the sun.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2020, 5:55 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,585
I do agree that it's pretty over-scaled compared to the rest of the skyline, stretching the full width of the block plus cantilevering over. But I do love the facade detailing and height.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted May 5, 2021, 4:30 PM
sjk sjk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 228
This one is still on the table since the convention center expansion won't expand West, correct? I haven't chimed in here yet but I am a fan of the location, color, texture, and height of the rendering. However, I agree that it could benefit from some significant design changes. I think that even adding something at the top like a crown or super unique/interesting light fixture could really make this more exciting. With that said, I'd be interested to see another developer's fresh ideas on what a tower in this location could look like (hopefully at least around that height or taller).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted May 5, 2021, 5:52 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjk View Post
This one is still on the table since the convention center expansion won't expand West, correct? I haven't chimed in here yet but I am a fan of the location, color, texture, and height of the rendering. However, I agree that it could benefit from some significant design changes. I think that even adding something at the top like a crown or super unique/interesting light fixture could really make this more exciting. With that said, I'd be interested to see another developer's fresh ideas on what a tower in this location could look like (hopefully at least around that height or taller).
I don't know anything specific, but have to guess that everything that wasn't the CC expansion is back on in some capacity. Personally I'm really interested in what happens with the Railyards. Those parcels only get more and more juicy as time goes on.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted May 5, 2021, 5:54 PM
GoldenBoot's Avatar
GoldenBoot GoldenBoot is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
...Personally I'm really interested in what happens with the Railyards. Those parcels only get more and more juicy as time goes on.
And for the price Karlin spent on them, they'll want to realize a return on that investment quickly (in some way, shape, fashion, or form).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted May 5, 2021, 8:03 PM
wwmiv wwmiv is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,846
These developments are the reason the expansion died. That means they’re serious about them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted May 5, 2021, 11:25 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by wwmiv View Post
These developments are the reason the expansion died. That means they’re serious about them.
My understanding about the CC expansion is that it may have to do with cash on hand with the city related to the (relative) lack of funds generated by the hotel sector over the last 12 months due to covid. Not to say that the developers are not serious about these lots, but the CC expansion being delayed and potentially not moving Westwards may not mean this specific proposals are gonna happen.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2021, 3:42 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 12,836
After more than a year of nothing happening with the site plan application, it has recently gone back into review. So something is happening, but there is no new info available about the project.

https://abc.austintexas.gov/web/permit/p...n=12326458&t_selected_propertyrsn=625418
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2021, 4:03 PM
DaveinWimberley DaveinWimberley is offline
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 105
And to think the big brother of third and shoal could join the neighborhood.
We are blessed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Jul 6, 2021, 4:04 PM
H2O H2O is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,641
I get the sense that multiple developers are chasing the prospect of another potential large office lease. Is FB still looking to lock down 1,000,000 sf? Tik Tok? Tesla? Somebody else?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:46 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.