Quote:
Originally Posted by The North One
I thought the French deemed Chicago uninhabitable and never colonized it, due to it being unfarmable swamp. Whatever settlement there must have been extremely tiny.
|
the only thing that i'm aware of the early french explorers "deeming" about the chicago area was noting the presence of Mud Lake and recognizing its importance for allowing portage-less passage between the great lakes and mississippi river watersheds during periods of high water.
but yes, the pre-yankee french settlement here was
extremely small. we're talking tiny and tenuous frontier village kinda stuff; certainly nothing like a more established detroit with multiple hundreds of people at the time..
which is why it was so utterly steam-rolled by the yankee invasion in the early 19th century, starting with the establishment of U.S. Fort Dearborn in 1803.
here's a pretty good primer on the 18th century french history of the chicago area:
https://earlychicago.com/essays_3/
so the french were here very early on in the 18th century, but they were
WAY too small in numbers to have much impact on chicago's overall cultural arc in the following centuries.
side bar: i grew up in suburban Wilmette, named for French/Metis fur trader Antoine Ouilmette, who was part of that very small early french world in chicago. after the fort dearborn evacuation/massacre in the war of 1812, he was the lone "white" settler in the area for a time (given his assumed Metis background, he was friendly with the indigenous Potawatomi, and thus his life was spared). he himself eventually decided to leave the area with his family as the yankees took over en masse in the 1820s.