Quote:
Originally Posted by davedensf
I hope Casa Bonita isn't torn down, but then I'm a child at heart.  I have great memories of my adventures there from the 1970s.
--Dave
|
Lucky are those of us who can maintain such a pleasant trait as well as our memories.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr1138
The "Gables" apartments a block away from Channel 7 encompasses pretty much everything both good and bad I just described. It isn't great architecture, but it's a hell of a lot better than the gas station that was there before. It actually defines the shape of the city block, which along this stretch of Speer is a HUGE improvement over the previous condition and makes it feel more like a proper urban boulevard.
|
This and the following post were 'much better than average' as they benefited from good context and explanation. Very relatable.
Speaking for myself (and others) lacking 'formal training' language more suitable for a 4th grader is always preferable. It also brought back various memories of previous discussions going back many years over 1) whether every apartment project should include retail 2) building to the property line 3) etc.
I can still recall the debate over Gables Speer Blvd. While not as nice as their Cherry Creek projects, I thought you put it into great context.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ndj
If a building is bad it better be extra historic to be worthy of preservation. It ought to be even more historic in proportion to the potential highest and best use of the land it occupies. The Denver 7 building is moderately bad, barely historic and occupies high value land. That adds up to no preservation for me.
|
Exactly!
Channel 7 is not the topic. What is lost is that they're the
property owner and these few who are obsessed with preservation should 'Man Up' and pay the fair market value so that Channel 7 becomes irrelevant. So childish that a few want to impose their 'loophole' without consequence or proper compensation.
Hopefully the Denver City Council does the right thing here.