Posted May 4, 2021, 2:58 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,393
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacek
Not sure at all 
But it seems weird to me that:
1) We'd be doing Green Line work more than a decade out from when the line is scheduled to be operating by the current published plan (surely we could find a use for any extra federal money for the Red line or other projects).
2) it would only be a single station
3) that it would specifically be termed a "temporary rail station". If it's early work for Green Line, seems like we'd be working towards those permanent stations. |
|
Threaded Mode