HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10261  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2021, 10:07 AM
CaliNative CaliNative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by headcheckjj View Post
Renderings show two towers, but the article only cites one?

Anyone know the deal?

https://urbanize.city/la/post/downtown-apartment-tower-12th-grand-2022

The Urbanize L.A. article says that preserving the old Felix Chevrolet building on the site may stall the project. I hope not! The old 2 story building is not particularly distinguished looking or worthy of preservation in my opinion and this new tower is well designed. Not all old buildings are worth preserving. Of course spare the good, historic and beloved ones like the wonderful old buildings and theaters on Broadway and Spring and elsewhere downtown. But does anyone love the old Felix Chevrolet building so much that they would derail this tower? The old and the mediocre and the obsolete must not be the enemy of the new and well designed.

Last edited by CaliNative; Apr 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM.
     
     
  #10262  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2021, 10:12 AM
CaliNative CaliNative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwright1 View Post
Brookfield Tower
Thanks for the photo update pw. Like colemonkee says maybe the tower will start rising rapidly now that the base is in place. One floor a week...maybe top out early next year? This well designed 64 floor tower will have an impact.

Last edited by CaliNative; Apr 25, 2021 at 10:30 AM.
     
     
  #10263  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2021, 6:10 AM
bhunsberger bhunsberger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNative View Post
The Urbanize L.A. article says that preserving the old Felix Chevrolet building on the site may stall the project. I hope not! The old 2 story building is not particularly distinguished looking or worthy of preservation in my opinion and this new tower is well designed. Not all old buildings are worth preserving. Of course spare the good, historic and beloved ones like the wonderful old buildings and theaters on Broadway and Spring and elsewhere downtown. But does anyone love the old Felix Chevrolet building so much that they would derail this tower? The old and the mediocre and the obsolete must not be the enemy of the new and well designed.
I would normally agree and say demo 9/10 of the 1-2 story buildings like this in downtown, but this one in particular I actually think it’s worth keeping. I like the architectural style of the facade & it’s symmetry.
     
     
  #10264  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2021, 7:29 AM
nmkef nmkef is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 111
We're talking about the same building right?



It's pretty dull and not worth preservation imo. The history is neat, but that's about it. Not to mention it's just another unused block with roll-up doors. Waste of space as it is, and even if it was "renovated" it's nothing like many other gems around, would have to be left as a facade to something else, which really doesn't match with the vibe.

If anything, I expect there might be a few NIMBY from the neighboring condo that may try to bring up preservation in a last-ditch effort to save their views.
     
     
  #10265  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2021, 10:10 AM
CaliNative CaliNative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmkef View Post
We're talking about the same building right?



It's pretty dull and not worth preservation imo. The history is neat, but that's about it. Not to mention it's just another unused block with roll-up doors. Waste of space as it is, and even if it was "renovated" it's nothing like many other gems around, would have to be left as a facade to something else, which really doesn't match with the vibe.

If anything, I expect there might be a few NIMBY from the neighboring condo that may try to bring up preservation in a last-ditch effort to save their views.
Totally agree....nothing worth preserving here. I don't see what all the fuss is about. The building is a squat eyesore in my opinion. The only thing worth preserving is the Felix the cat sign. I think the "preservationists" or view savers may lose this one hopefully.
     
     
  #10266  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2021, 2:45 PM
bhunsberger bhunsberger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 244
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmkef View Post
We're talking about the same building right?



It's pretty dull and not worth preservation imo. The history is neat, but that's about it. Not to mention it's just another unused block with roll-up doors. Waste of space as it is, and even if it was "renovated" it's nothing like many other gems around, would have to be left as a facade to something else, which really doesn't match with the vibe.

If anything, I expect there might be a few NIMBY from the neighboring condo that may try to bring up preservation in a last-ditch effort to save their views.
Yeeeeeah, I was talking about the building sandwiched between the towers in the rendering... the building you have pictured here, totally needs to go.
     
     
  #10267  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2021, 9:47 PM
nmkef nmkef is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 111
Yea there was a presentation in the south park BID a few weeks back where they specifically called out preserving that small brick building in-between. It does have a nice look in the render. Not sure if they own it and are going to turn it into a plaza or they'll just leave it as-is. Right now I think there's a luxury watch showroom there.
     
     
  #10268  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2021, 1:41 AM
CaliNative CaliNative is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 3,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmkef View Post
Yea there was a presentation in the south park BID a few weeks back where they specifically called out preserving that small brick building in-between. It does have a nice look in the render. Not sure if they own it and are going to turn it into a plaza or they'll just leave it as-is. Right now I think there's a luxury watch showroom there.
If it's the red brick building, seems like they could build around it. Looks like a nice building.
     
     
  #10269  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2021, 3:26 AM
ocman ocman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Burlingame
Posts: 2,712
DTLA’s most important redevelopment project (Broadway Trade Center) resolved its forclosure issue and has an extended development loan. They’re still trying to sell it though even while the redevelopment is continuing.

https://commercialobserver.com/2021/04/d...ontinental-equities-office-hotel/#slide0

Also old news but Curtis Stone will open his new restaurant on the rooftop of the Trust building in exactly one year. His other restaurants have gotten good reviews from the food media sources that matter, but with varying levels of success.
     
     
  #10270  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2021, 3:41 AM
badrunner badrunner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 3,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNative View Post
If it's the red brick building, seems like they could build around it. Looks like a nice building.
Yeah, it's 1225 Grand, not the corner building pictured above (1201). 1225 Grand is an unreinforced masonry building (you could see the seismic through-bolts coming out the sides) and they usually just tear those down. "Preserving" it basically means tearing it down and rebuilding it, while keeping the facade intact. It really shouldn't hold up the project...
     
     
  #10271  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2021, 3:48 AM
badrunner badrunner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 3,134
Apparently 1225 was to be preserved and 1201 was slated for demolition and that's what's potentially causing the delay. To me, neither building is all that remarkable and neither should hold up the project. Buildings of that vintage are a dime a dozen in DTLA.
     
     
  #10272  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2021, 7:08 AM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by badrunner View Post
Yeah, it's 1225 Grand, not the corner building pictured above (1201). 1225 Grand is an unreinforced masonry building (you could see the seismic through-bolts coming out the sides) and they usually just tear those down. "Preserving" it basically means tearing it down and rebuilding it, while keeping the facade intact. It really shouldn't hold up the project...
The facade is nice though and worth keeping around, whoever designed it spent time on it. The streamline building on the corner can go and really shouldn't be controversial.
__________________
Downtown LA Development Map • Central LA Development Map • Pasadena Development Map

*Send PM for updates/edits/corrections*
     
     
  #10273  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2021, 1:01 PM
RuFFy's Avatar
RuFFy RuFFy is offline
FlyyyFALiiFe
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 364
1.5 - 2 billion project proposed in the arts district to include a residential skyscraper and 10 buildings.

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-04-29/fourth-central-development-arts-district
     
     
  #10274  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2021, 1:37 PM
LAisthePlace's Avatar
LAisthePlace LAisthePlace is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by RuFFy View Post
1.5 - 2 billion project proposed in the arts district to include a residential skyscraper and 10 buildings.

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-04-29/fourth-central-development-arts-district
a

Designed by one of the best firms working in Southern California (Studio One Eleven) and one of the best firms working in the world (David Adjaye & Associates). I really hope this happens.





     
     
  #10275  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2021, 3:08 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,904
Absolutely fantastic. Everything about it
     
     
  #10276  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2021, 4:31 PM
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,841
Super cool, I couldn't read the article because a subscription is required, did it say anything about ground breaking / approval timeline?
     
     
  #10277  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2021, 4:38 PM
headcheckjj's Avatar
headcheckjj headcheckjj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 222

Would be nice, but I'm not holding my breath. After all, 6AM has gone nowhere.


Quote:
Originally Posted by LAisthePlace View Post
a

Designed by one of the best firms working in Southern California (Studio One Eleven) and one of the best firms working in the world (David Adjaye & Associates). I really hope this happens.





     
     
  #10278  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2021, 4:42 PM
headcheckjj's Avatar
headcheckjj headcheckjj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
Super cool, I couldn't read the article because a subscription is required, did it say anything about ground breaking / approval timeline?
From the article: "He hopes to start construction on Fourth & Central within two years and complete it in phases over the following five to seven years."
     
     
  #10279  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2021, 5:50 PM
LAisthePlace's Avatar
LAisthePlace LAisthePlace is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 292
Also promising in terms of it actually happening "The Denver developer seeks to make over Los Angeles Cold Storage’s 7.6 acres for a project called Fourth & Central. It would be financed by private investment, Falcone said."
     
     
  #10280  
Old Posted Apr 29, 2021, 6:03 PM
headcheckjj's Avatar
headcheckjj headcheckjj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 222
How does that make it any more promising? That's how they all do it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAisthePlace View Post
Also promising in terms of it actually happening "The Denver developer seeks to make over Los Angeles Cold Storage’s 7.6 acres for a project called Fourth & Central. It would be financed by private investment, Falcone said."
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:08 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.