Quote:
Originally Posted by Always Sunny in SLC
25% is good enough. I don’t like the method anyway. They should just supply vouchers so people can take that and find a place that works best for them instead of specified spots.
|
Obviously even if the whole development were affordable, it would only make a small dent, but the whole thing seems a bit cynical doesn't it? Tear out the homeless shelter to put a mid-rise luxury housing development in its place with a token amount of semi-affordable housing (and yes, I would classify 60%-80% AMI as semi-affordable). I agree that the method of supplying affordable housing sucks, but there's nothing that Salt Lake City alone can do about that.
I do think that the design of the project is nice - a definite step above most of what we get. In most instances I would be happy for a development like that to be built. But the whole process just doesn't sit right with me.
Not to mention, all you have to do is take a walk or drive around downtown Salt Lake to realize how bad the homelessness issue is getting. I agree that we have to build more housing of all types, but I also strongly believe that we need to be prioritizing the people that are most in need now, especially in the midst of the financial damage that Covid has brought to so many people.
And I'm veering into tangent territory here, but I still believe that placing the main men's resource center in South Salt Lake was a huge mistake.