HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #19181  
Old Posted Dec 31, 2020, 9:13 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by cov View Post
Early Canadians reaped racial/colonial privileges that top the worst war crimes in history. The land and resources were taken for free at gunpoint. Squandering their wealth overtime is almost cosmic justice. Demanding community responsibility at this time is completely fraudulent.

I had to stop reading at the part where you claimed that early Canadians are somehow owed housing like their parents. Why does society owe their bloodline colonial standard of living in perpetuity? They are not nobility. We once put the monarchy under the guillotine and I simply can't believe people want it back. Birth conditions should not assert privileges period.

I would love to see housing prices drop and the rental market stabilize, it's good for everybody. But why support it with bizarre moral labyrinths?

Anyhow to get back on topic, I see a BC liquor express as a tenant in Bidwell. Is it any different from a regular bc liquor?

Assuming this response is aimed at my comment, can you please do me a favour and point out exactly where I claimed that?

That would be just really great, thanks.
Use the quote function if you can, like I did.

And assuming you can't (because I didn't) it would be great if you refrained from putting words in my mouth (or my comments) that I never said.


Again.......quote function,.....really useful tool.
Use it.
     
     
  #19182  
Old Posted Jan 1, 2021, 5:32 AM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,058
Deleted
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/

Last edited by Changing City; Jan 1, 2021 at 4:12 PM. Reason: Response to post now deleted
     
     
  #19183  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2021, 12:56 AM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
From Dailyhive:
Video Link
     
     
  #19184  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2021, 2:08 AM
Vancouver_Highrise's Avatar
Vancouver_Highrise Vancouver_Highrise is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 320
Did I see them taking down the Trump signage in that video!?

Edit: nvm
     
     
  #19185  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2021, 3:05 AM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,531
Any similarities to the flight scene in the new blade runner?

Video Link


Video Link
     
     
  #19186  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2021, 4:57 AM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Any similarities to the flight scene in the new blade runner?

.....
Everything except the flying car.

Where's my flying car?
I was promised a flying car for my dystopian future by all my childhood sci-fi movies by the time I got older.

Back To the Future II practically had everyone driving one by 2015.
(....alongside dehydrated pizza and clunky video phones)

Come on, Elon....

Chop! Chop!
Get to it!
Get to it!
     
     
  #19187  
Old Posted Jan 5, 2021, 10:34 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
Everything except the flying car.

Where's my flying car?
I was promised a flying car for my dystopian future by all my childhood sci-fi movies by the time I got older.

Back To the Future II practically had everyone driving one by 2015.
(....alongside dehydrated pizza and clunky video phones)

Come on, Elon....

Chop! Chop!
Get to it!
Get to it!
Tesla delivered half a million cars in 2020, during a pandemic. It's coming along, just on the ground instead of in the air.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #19188  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2021, 12:28 AM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
Lots to unpack here.

But let's just say that right off the bat, I agree with others' view that your original comments and views (including some of the ones expressed here) are considerably out of touch and just generally lacking in any compassion or humanity.
Ok.

Quote:
A lot of the people you're slating off as being "irresponsible" for still being in the rental market rather than ownership happen to be multi-generational Canadians - which I realize in your mind as an admitted 1st generation immigrant, implies that they should be miles ahead of you already, in terms of their current station in life having had a bit of a "headstart", ....if we can just call it that....that you yourself didn't have as a young person moving here.
Except it doesn't quite work that way all the time, and it's not as simplistic as all that.
Ok.

Quote:
A lot of those 30 something year olds (or even 40 or 50 something year olds) who've been forced into the rental market come from families where their own parents and grandparents before them, owned the homes they grew up in, and probably even hoped to pass down to their kids and grandkids as part of their legacy.
This is where you start to lose me. Counting on inheriting even $1, is counting on $1 too much.

Quote:
But a lot has happened in the last 30-40 years that's made that difficult, if not impossible, for a lot of families and made it harder for them to own homes like those who came before them - and not all of it is (in fact most of it is not) their fault, and has nothing to do with their own levels of "personal responsibility", their diligence (or laziness).
Definitely lost me here. Did these changes just happen without anyone noticing, at the snap of a finger? No. Access to information has been rather evenly distributed for sometime.

Vancouver has been getting more and more unaffordable the entire time I have lived here. There have been some short blips in time - GFC in 2008, Covid in 2020, but the trend is about as clear as any.

As I type this, I can predict with confidence, it will be more expensive to live here all around, and even more difficult to get into the market in 10 years. Plan accordingly!

Quote:
In many cases you're talking about educated folks, many just freshly graduated from college or graduate schools trying to put down roots themselves but finding that whereas their parents were able to buy their own family home that they grew up in for $50k, 90k or even $120,000, 40-50 years ago, suddenly you need no less than $700,000 to a couple of millions of dollars just to get into the ownership game and buy into a home that's less than half the size of the one you grew up with, and that that simply isn't an option at your current state in life.
Yes. Nothing in life is a given. Owning a house/property certainly isn't. We both know this information. Make educated life decisions, with the facts you have on hand.

Quote:
We're talking mostly millennials here with good decent(ish) paying jobs, and even on the other end you might have 40 and 50 something year old Gen-Xer's who were in the home ownership but have been forced into rental also for reasons not entirely under their control.
For a lot of these people, THIS is their home (as in Greater Vancouver and BC), and they're not going to be able to suddenly pick up and pack up and move to a more "affordable" town or city in the Prairies or the Atlantic provinces where they have no support system at all.
Moving is difficult. Immigrating is difficult. Life is difficult. I don't disagree. But I do fail to see the larger point?
Its certainly not societies responsibility to "give" you anything if you are fully capable of earning/working for it yourself.

And lets be honest - most of the people we are actually talking about are the same folk that will tell you that moving to Langley or Surrey is like being shipped off to the gulags...

Not the same if legitimate impediments are in place - mental health, etc.

Quote:
And I'm saying all this as a first generation immigrant myself, like you.
And like you, and as an immigrant you ought to be aware of the fact that there's some level of privilege to being able to immigrate to another country - by choice - and as a non-refugee immigrant with the kind of support system, that allows one to set down roots relatively quickly and ensconce yourself into the social strata at a decent level and station.
100%. I count my lucky stars daily for being able to have immigrated to Canada. Its been a blessing, and I'm always appreciate of the opportunity this country gave me.

Quote:
Surely that should behoove you some level of empathy for people like them, in much the same way you (hopefully) have for people that you and I left behind who couldn't afford to immigrate like we did.
I have a lot of empathy. Don't mistake my point out ones personal responsibility for a lack of empathy.

But empathy has limits. People need to be responsible for personal choices.

I cannot count the amount of people I know at work, or in social circles that moan about Vancouver being unaffordable or "never being able to buy.'

They all generally fit the same profile - raised in Vancouver. Always expected to own. Parents have a multimillion dollar home paid off. They drive nice cars, and pay expensive rent in nice condos. They eat out alot, and spend a good chunk on personal services and appearances.

How about move to the burbs, live in a ground floor suite, commute to work for 2 years, and save the money needed to get ahead.

For those that are literally unable to do that due to finances? Well the reality is, the less successful you are, the further out you will have to live away from the "core" of any desirable location. This isn't unique to Vancouver.
I don't think its societies responsibility to ensure they have a Vancouver condo to live. But I do think its society's responsibility to ensure they have a fair shot at earning a living in this country if they don't have a legitimate impediment to being able to do so.

If this means the rich in Downtown wont have baristas to serve them coffee. Tough luck. Not much sympathy for that either. But there are market solutions - JJ bean is a great local success story.

Quote:
I've heard this,.... "if you can't afford to live here, then you should be here" view before, typically (and sad to say) often from immigrants, most of whom immigrated here from relatively well-to-do families and situations and from a certain demographic, and often time forgetting the role their own immigration to this country might be playing into making it more difficult for the native born Canadians. While also conveniently forgetting the reality that if they really can't afford to live here as they observed then they just as likely can't afford to move anywhere else that you think would be more fitting for them.
Covid proved beyond a doubt that immigration is making Vancouver unaffordable. But to those with eyes open, didn't need Covid to see that.
But Canada as a country has agreed that immigration is a somewhat "untouchable" topic to discuss. And as such, with the covid exception, I would plan around high immigration levels indefinitely.

Quote:
As Genwhy observed, Burnaby and Metrotown specifically, ignored this problem for the longest time, with many of those in power to do anything about it probably having the same "personal responsibility" view and approach that you're taking, as they enjoyed the tax and revenue benefits of a runaway red hot real estate market, right up until it drove all of them out of power when the problem ran out of control.
Sounds like a reasonable market force reaction.

Quote:
It's not unreasonable to expect that the cities and the powers-that-be under whose stewardship (in successive administrations and regimes), the housing market and situation went out of control, pick up some of the burden of (social) responsibility in trying to help prevent it get even worse.
Yes and no. If government would stay out of housing completely there would be no need to have this conversation.

Every well intentioned idea around making housing more affordable will nearly always make it less so.

Vancouver does not exist in a vacuum, these issues have been fought, discussed, and solved in other locales.

The only way housing becomes more affordable in this city is one of two options;

1. Massive deregulation of the entire building sector. Zoning, permitting, building codes, etc.

2. Government stepping in and building true non market housing, like Singapore. Non speculative, not for profit housing stock.

Option 1 will never happen. We will sooner regulate ourselves into never building even a treehouse. This would also absolutely crater land values, not likely to ever actually be voted on seriously.

Option 2, more likely to happen, but not for decades.

Quote:
(read : homelessness, which clearly people here hate even more, and think just magically falls out of the sky as a societal problem happening only to those who 'deserve' it).
No one "deserves" to be homeless. Least of which those who are truly unable to help their reality - mentally ill, handicapped, etc.

I'm firmly pro social assistance and housing for those individuals, but they represent a tiny, tiny portion of whole population.

Last edited by rofina; Jan 6, 2021 at 12:40 AM.
     
     
  #19189  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2021, 12:51 AM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
As long as there are jobs in the city requiring workers for whom "the city isn't the right choice" there is a responsibility to ensure housing for them. Especially in a city hellbent on proving that it's the "greenest city".
I disagree.

Its my and your responsibility to ensure our tax dollars somehow pay or subsidize housing so that Starbucks can be sure it has workers available for its highest profit locations in most desirable locales?

I don't think so.
     
     
  #19190  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2021, 1:21 AM
NewfBC NewfBC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
Tesla delivered half a million cars in 2020, during a pandemic. It's coming along, just on the ground instead of in the air.
Robots are immune to Covid.

Ron.
     
     
  #19191  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2021, 12:01 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina View Post
Ok.

This is where you start to lose me. Counting on inheriting even $1, is counting on $1 too much.
I mean,...

I wasn't really trying to win you over, but okay.

Also what's wrong with inheriting one's family's wealth or legacy? (or the inverse, ....in expecting to pass on the fruits of your own lifetime of labour to your children and grandchildren - which is actually the point I was making and not whatever the hell it is you perverted it to mean I was suggesting that these are lazy entitled people expecting to inherit or "counting on" inheriting wealth, while working nothing for themselves)?

Did you immigrate to Canada all on your own personal efforts, resources and power or did you need to rely (even somewhat, or however indirectly) on the largesse of those who came before you?
Honestly?

So why is it any different or anymore wrong for people here to inherit wealth or even get help from their parents like you're trying to paint it as some terrible thing?

Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina View Post
Definitely lost me here. Did these changes just happen without anyone noticing, at the snap of a finger? No. Access to information has been rather evenly distributed for sometime.

Vancouver has been getting more and more unaffordable the entire time I have lived here. There have been some short blips in time - GFC in 2008, Covid in 2020, but the trend is about as clear as any.

As I type this, I can predict with confidence, it will be more expensive to live here all around, and even more difficult to get into the market in 10 years. Plan accordingly!

Again, don't really care whether I "lost" you or not. It's clear you're not here to have your views or preconceived notions and belief systems challenged, nor to question them yourself, so why you'd imagine anyone is trying to do so for you is beyond me.

So if I'm to understand you correctly, it's still a person's own fault if they find themselves 30 or so years on from when their parents could buy and own a home, as a result of circumstances truly out of their control, that they're unable to do so themselves.....because......they didn't "plan accordingly"?

What? They're supposed to have magical powers to see into the future and plan to move out of the city or the area to a more affordable place?

Fascinating.


Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina View Post
Yes. Nothing in life is a given. Owning a house/property certainly isn't. We both know this information. Make educated life decisions, with the facts you have on hand.

Nobody said anything in life is a given. Anymore than I suggested that owning a house/property is.
It's possible to make correct, prudent and responsible life decisions and still be met with circumstances that you couldn't possibly have been prepared for nor anticipated.

It's very odd to see someone sitting there and acting as if anyone finding themselves in, not the most optimal state of their lives, is because they were either lazy, entitled, unprepared or just generally deserving of their current predicament.

But then again we've already established the massive empathy deficit you seem to suffer from, so I suppose there's no surprise here.




Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina View Post
Moving is difficult. Immigrating is difficult. Life is difficult. I don't disagree. But I do fail to see the larger point?
Its certainly not societies responsibility to "give" you anything if you are fully capable of earning/working for it yourself.
Never said anything about society being responsible to "give" anything to anyone much less that they didn't earn themselves or work for.

And it's certainly a far cry from suggesting that yes, it should be government's responsibility to ensure the sort of social safety nets we expect from a civilized society and to enact the sort of policy that make the city and the country not just a livable society but a humane one.
You know how I know this?
We pay into the system with our taxes for them to do so.



Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina View Post
100%. I count my lucky stars daily for being able to have immigrated to Canada. Its been a blessing, and I'm always appreciate of the opportunity this country gave me.
You have an odd way of showing it.

Crapping all over the people in the land I emigrate to is not exactly how I imagine showing that sort of appreciation.
But maybe that's just me.

But hey, different strokes, for different folks.


Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina View Post
I have a lot of empathy. Don't mistake my point out ones personal responsibility for a lack of empathy.
I'm sure you believe that on some level.
So that's good.


Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina View Post
But empathy has limits. People need to be responsible for personal choices.

I cannot count the amount of people I know at work, or in social circles that moan about Vancouver being unaffordable or "never being able to buy.'

They all generally fit the same profile - raised in Vancouver. Always expected to own. Parents have a multimillion dollar home paid off. They drive nice cars, and pay expensive rent in nice condos. They eat out alot, and spend a good chunk on personal services and appearances.

How about move to the burbs, live in a ground floor suite, commute to work for 2 years, and save the money needed to get ahead.

So how about those that don't fit into that nice neatly organized "profile" and don't "have parents who have multimillion dollar homes paid off",....and who don't "drive nice cars",...or...."pay expensive rent in nice condos,...eat out a lot....(or) spend a good chunk on personal services and appearances."?

What about them?
You know the ones who actually work hard and are relatively successful in their own professions, if not at least good at what they do (even if not compensated commensurately), didn't have wealthy megabucks dads and moms, didn't inherit trust funds, don't live large, eat nice or spend silly money on niceties,....but still find the city unaffordable and are incapable of buying into home ownership?

How about them?
F**k 'em, right?

To hell with all the rest of them that comprise (....**checks notes**....) the actual majority of people who live in this city and don't fit into your neat little {crassly generalizing and lazy stereotyping} boxes?
Right?

I'm still not sure which is more ridiculous.
That you truly believe some of the claptrap you spew, or whether you truly believe that all it takes is moving to the 'burbs to "..live in a ground floor suit and commuting for 2 years, saving money" and then suddenly you'll be able to move up a social strata into the home ownership bracket.

Two years!

(*Face slap*)


The only question left to ask at this point is, do you have to work hard at coming off as such an heartless A-hole, or does it just come naturally to you?



Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina View Post
Yes and no. If government would stay out of housing completely there would be no need to have this conversation.

Every well intentioned idea around making housing more affordable will nearly always make it less so.

Vancouver does not exist in a vacuum, these issues have been fought, discussed, and solved in other locales.

The only way housing becomes more affordable in this city is one of two options;

1. Massive deregulation of the entire building sector. Zoning, permitting, building codes, etc.

2. Government stepping in and building true non market housing, like Singapore. Non speculative, not for profit housing stock.

Option 1 will never happen. We will sooner regulate ourselves into never building even a treehouse. This would also absolutely crater land values, not likely to ever actually be voted on seriously.

Option 2, more likely to happen, but not for decades.

Talk about contradicting one's self.

On the one hand...

rofina : "Government should stay out of housing completely so there's no more need for conversations such as this."


okay.
On the other hand...

also rofina : "The problem only gets fixed if Government steps in and builds true non-market housing, like {**insert-City-here-with-model-that-could-never-work-anywhere-else-in-the-world**}, Non speculative, not for profit housing stock"

Cool. Cool.


I think I'm beginning to understand how the massive empathy deficit thing happens.

Geez, I'd hate to meet someone like you in real life.

But then again, maybe I do, all the time.
     
     
  #19192  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 2:38 AM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
I mean,...

I wasn't really trying to win you over, but okay.
Trying or not I'm open to new idea or having my notions changes with convincing arguments.

Quote:
Also what's wrong with inheriting one's family's wealth or legacy? (or the inverse, ....in expecting to pass on the fruits of your own lifetime of labour to your children and grandchildren - which is actually the point I was making and not whatever the hell it is you perverted it to mean I was suggesting that these are lazy entitled people expecting to inherit or "counting on" inheriting wealth, while working nothing for themselves)?
Nothing wrong with it at all. Generational wealth is clearly more important now than ever. Simply put; it would be a foolish thing to rely on for ones success. Out of caution I would treat an inheritance as an unexpected bonus.

Quote:
Did you immigrate to Canada all on your own personal efforts, resources and power or did you need to rely (even somewhat, or however indirectly) on the largesse of those who came before you?
Honestly?
I know you have a preconceived notion of who I am - I'm not blind to the privilege I have and sacrifice of those before me. Of course I had a helping hand. My single mother immigrated here with me with very basic English and little money. If not for her effort who knows what the alternative was?

Quote:
So why is it any different or anymore wrong for people here to inherit wealth or even get help from their parents like you're trying to paint it as some terrible thing?
Nope. No painting of a horrible thing. Just don't count on it. That's foolish. Blaze your own trail, and create your own success first.

Quote:
Again, don't really care whether I "lost" you or not. It's clear you're not here to have your views or preconceived notions and belief systems challenged, nor to question them yourself, so why you'd imagine anyone is trying to do so for you is beyond me.
You do care, and you should care. Were having a conversation. There is little clear about me here, and little clear about you. Which is why were conversing to begin with, if I could read your mind this would be a lot less interesting.
Quote:
So if I'm to understand you correctly, it's still a person's own fault if they find themselves 30 or so years on from when their parents could buy and own a home, as a result of circumstances truly out of their control, that they're unable to do so themselves.....because......they didn't "plan accordingly"?

What? They're supposed to have magical powers to see into the future and plan to move out of the city or the area to a more affordable place?
No need for magical power - a 30 year trend is safe enough thing to bet on as any in life. You can bet on more expensive housing, more density, more people, more division and more difficult life. This isn't my opinion, this is something that's clear to see looking back, and one can reasonably deduce that unless there are major changes worthy of revaluating that trend, plan for it to continue. I'm saying, as of right now, that trend is set to continue.

Simple example - Trudeau and the Liberals plan to admit 1.3million new Canadians into the country over the next 3 years. Knowing this, as its commonly shared information, its incumbent on a fully formed human to understand how that will affect the; job market, housing market, rental market, etc. Now you have future information - plan accordingly. I am.

Quote:
Nobody said anything in life is a given. Anymore than I suggested that owning a house/property is.
It's possible to make correct, prudent and responsible life decisions and still be met with circumstances that you couldn't possibly have been prepared for nor anticipated.
Agreed. Life happens, and its not always good, that's for sure.

Quote:
It's very odd to see someone sitting there and acting as if anyone finding themselves in, not the most optimal state of their lives, is because they were either lazy, entitled, unprepared or just generally deserving of their current predicament.

But then again we've already established the massive empathy deficit you seem to suffer from, so I suppose there's no surprise here.
Not always. My statements are not absolute. But if you are a reasonably educated, employed, 30 somethin year old complaining about getting kicked out of a rental and not being able to afford something. You're right, not a ton of empathy from me.

Quote:
Never said anything about society being responsible to "give" anything to anyone much less that they didn't earn themselves or work for.
Fair. Same page.

Quote:
And it's certainly a far cry from suggesting that yes, it should be government's responsibility to ensure the sort of social safety nets we expect from a civilized society and to enact the sort of policy that make the city and the country not just a livable society but a humane one.
You know how I know this?
We pay into the system with our taxes for them to do so
.
Yes this reasonable. We need safety nets. Zero debate on that from me. But the safety nets need to be in place for those who cant help themselves. Not for those who refuse to help themselves via personal sacrifices.

Quote:
You have an odd way of showing it.

Crapping all over the people in the land I emigrate to is not exactly how I imagine showing that sort of appreciation.
But maybe that's just me.

But hey, different strokes, for different folks.
Fair. Call it tough love. I will admit the sense of entitlement, in Vancouver in particular, is palpable.

Quote:
I'm sure you believe that on some level.
So that's good.
I'm no Mother Teresa. I'm under no illusion. But I am firmly in favor of helping those who cant help themselves. That's a prerequisite of any successful society.


Quote:
So how about those that don't fit into that nice neatly organized "profile" and don't "have parents who have multimillion dollar homes paid off",....and who don't "drive nice cars",...or...."pay expensive rent in nice condos,...eat out a lot....(or) spend a good chunk on personal services and appearances."?

What about them?
You know the ones who actually work hard and are relatively successful in their own professions, if not at least good at what they do (even if not compensated commensurately), didn't have wealthy megabucks dads and moms, didn't inherit trust funds, don't live large, eat nice or spend silly money on niceties,....but still find the city unaffordable and are incapable of buying into home ownership?

How about them?
F**k 'em, right?
What about them? Then they cant afford to live here, harsh, but reality. Someone else can afford to pay the cost. I cant afford Downtown, Yaletown, Kits, North Van, and other desirable areas. I owned in East Van. That's what happens. You do the best you can and try and hustle and improve where possible to get ahead.

Quote:
To hell with all the rest of them that comprise (....**checks notes**....) the actual majority of people who live in this city and don't fit into your neat little {crassly generalizing and lazy stereotyping} boxes?
Right?
Your off on a bit of tangent. This isn't black and white. I'm not advocating for zero help and the Hunger Games.

Quote:
I'm still not sure which is more ridiculous.
That you truly believe some of the claptrap you spew, or whether you truly believe that all it takes is moving to the 'burbs to "..live in a ground floor suit and commuting for 2 years, saving money" and then suddenly you'll be able to move up a social strata into the home ownership bracket.

Two years!

(*Face slap*)
Its kind of neat to read down your post and see the disgust and contempt bleed through the further one scrolls.

Yes, it literally is possible. Not for all, but for many. It probably also means working up the property ladder, maybe a side gig for extra cash.

Or maybe it means working 2 jobs at about 14 hours a day like I did for 2 years to try and save up for DP. It cost me health, it cost me time, it wasn't fun. But it paid off and I wouldn't change it for anything.

Quote:
The only question left to ask at this point is, do you have to work hard at coming off as such an heartless A-hole, or does it just come naturally to you?
The only question left to ask you is - do you always attack the person? Or are you not able to stick to the idea instead?


Quote:
Talk about contradicting one's self.

On the one hand...

rofina : "Government should stay out of housing completely so there's no more need for conversations such as this."


okay.
On the other hand...

also rofina : "The problem only gets fixed if Government steps in and builds true non-market housing, like {**insert-City-here-with-model-that-could-never-work-anywhere-else-in-the-world**}, Non speculative, not for profit housing stock"

Cool. Cool.
I agree with cool, cool. Its cool to have a nuanced and realistic view of the world. There's many solutions, some more realistic than others.

Government policy is to blame for most negative trends.

But in actual, applicable reality, in order to make change you have to work within the confines of reality. The reality in our country is that overly accommodating government housing policy has created unaffordable housing across the nation.

So now to think that the government will suddenly completely back away and not do anything again is naïve and unrealistic.

A realistic solution in our reality is a Singapore approach, a proper double down into government driven housing initiatives.

Quote:
I think I'm beginning to understand how the massive empathy deficit thing happens.
Do share.

Quote:
Geez, I'd hate to meet someone like you in real life.

But then again, maybe I do, all the time.
Happy to share a meal with you anytime. I don't know a thing about you, but always willing to learn.
     
     
  #19193  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 2:46 AM
cov cov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 245
Quote:
Again.......quote function,.....really useful tool.
Use it.
Wow. Initially, I didn't want to dig too deep into meandering social justice monologues, but I should elaborate on my response to make your misguided moral premises explicit.

The context of the discussion surrounds whether renters of old housing stock are indeed owed the current level of compensation. To justify the compensation you made arguments that depend on the premise that society has an obligation to provide early Canadians with colonial housing privileges of their parents (let's call it "colonial housing privilege" for short), and the erosion of that obligation is why they deserve to be compensated.

I will explain why colonial housing privilege is a necessary premise of your arguments. Your monologue partitions into 2 parts, the former presents why people facing demoviction deserve compensation, the latter is a hodgepodge of who is to blame and consequences of inaction. I will focus on the former, but will also touch on the latter because it introduces concepts that directly contradicts the former.

You justify compensation by describing the characteristics of the demographic facing demoviction. The characteristics deserving of sympathy as described are 3 folds: early Canadian, young, and well educated (with good jobs). The latter 2 in themselves only serve as dressing for the first characteristic, as it would be absurd to claim that every young and educated human being deserves compensation for not being able to live in Vancouver. Therefore being born with early Canadian ancestry is the core characteristic that justifies compensation, and it is the only thing you discuss at length. let's see some of the excerpts:

Quote:
in the rental market rather than ownership happen to be multi-generational Canadians...
Quote:
who've been forced into the rental market come from families where their own parents and grandparents before them...
Quote:
For a lot of these people, THIS is their home
Merely describing the demographic facing demoviction of course does not in itself justify compensation. This argument relies on the premise that this demographic is mistreated which makes them deserving of compensation. The mistreatment is explicitly stated as the inability to have access to colonial housing privileges of their parents and grandparents, privileges that early Canadians still benefit from and are inaccessible to new immigrants.

Quote:
their parents were able to buy their own family home that they grew up in for $50k, 90k or even $120,000, 40-50 years ago, suddenly you need no less than $700,000 to a couple of millions of dollars just to get into the ownership game and buy into a home that's less than half the size of the one you grew up with
Note that these are privileges, not mistreatments. This privilege can only be turned into mistreatment only if renters with early Canadian ancestry are morally obligated to own the type of housing of their ancestors. The violation of that moral obligation is mistreatment and thus complete the reasoning behind their entitlement to compensation.

Note that it is not enough that early Canadians have housing, you repeatedly and explicitly stated that their mistreatment roots from not having housing access equivalent to that of their parents:

Quote:
parents and grandparents before them, owned the homes they grew up in, and probably even hoped to pass down to their kids and grandkids as part of their legacy
Quote:
for a lot of families and made it harder for them to own homes like those who came before them
Quote:
buy into a home that's less than half the size of the one you grew up with
I just explained why your arguments depend on the necessary premise that society owes people certain ancestry colonial privileges. This is an utterly immoral premise to hold.

Last edited by cov; Jan 7, 2021 at 3:04 AM.
     
     
  #19194  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 3:04 AM
cov cov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 245
While I'm at it I just want to call out some direct contradictions and worrying morals in the latter partition of your comment.

in part 1 you characterized early Canadians as "millennials here with good decent(ish) paying jobs", and whose parents massively benefitted from the housing market. However, part 2 directly contradicts that description (note that this quote embodies the phrase I marked in italics):

Quote:
conveniently forgetting the reality that if they really can't afford to live here as they observed then they just as likely can't afford to move anywhere else that you think would be more fitting for them
I thought these people are well educated with good-paying jobs. What happened?

part two also blames a certain demographic:

Quote:
typically (and sad to say) often from immigrants, most of whom immigrated here from relatively well-to-do families and situations and from a certain demographic, and often time forgetting the role their own immigration to this country might be playing into making it more difficult for the native born Canadians.
I'm sure you are not alone to feel this way, but immigrants from a certain demographic have housing needs, and whose participation in the economy isn't different from anyone else's. This certain demographic did not have access to colonial privileges of the early Canadians, and had to overpay millions to early Canadians at a market rate that early Canadians set.

So you blame housing difficulties experienced by locals on immigrants from a certain demographic, when it is the parents and grandparents of the natives who:
  1. designed a housing market that gaurantees perpetual housing shortage and therefore homelessness and asset appreciation
  2. explicitly designed a city with class segregation and racial segregation in mind
  3. are still presently a powerful political force advocating against more housing in this city

isn't that ironic. Note that the burden to rehouse renters isn't shared by society. Much like how most below-market housing stock is built, it is solely the duty of the developer to pay for this, and by proxy completely paid for by new immigrants and young natives themselves.
     
     
  #19195  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 4:00 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,589
^^ Way to ruin the Downtown thread
     
     
  #19196  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 4:02 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,589
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcminsen View Post
Still working on it. Most of the balcony glass is installed now.




Dec.29 '20, my pics


















Nice photos!
     
     
  #19197  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 4:07 AM
cov cov is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 245
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
^^ Way to ruin the Downtown thread
     
     
  #19198  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 8:23 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,489
Great looking balconies!
     
     
  #19199  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 5:20 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
That development turned out really nice. Love it!

Nice height and scale too. Not too tall and imposing.
     
     
  #19200  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2021, 5:33 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,531
Not a fan of the safeway podium with the western-frontier-style fake facades, as if a totally different design team did the podium apart from the tower. What's the point of hiding valuable street frontage with opaque wall "art"?
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:16 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.