Regina Civic Politics - Page 3

cityboy · #41 Posted **Oct 23, 2020, 7:30 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by djforsberg

The idea to move the buses is nothing but a plan to relocate undesirable people. I have both taken the bus and used the Cornwall Street parkade plenty of times in recent years. I see absolutely no issues that would be solved by moving the buses. We should be encouraging people to take the bus, not the opposite (we should also ban any future surface parking lots and disincentivize further commercial developments in the suburbs).

Although I generally support what you are getting at, as a regular transit user and someone who lives in a suburban neighbourhood, I have to disagree with both of your points. While there is probably some truth to your point about undesirable people, I can personally attest to the fact that transferring on 11th is not a very pleasant experience. As I mentioned, 11th should be developed as a retail and restaurant district with on street parking, as well as Hamilton, Scarth and parts of Victoria and Smith to support and compliment what is already there. It may be years away, but I support what Namarind wants to do on 11th and Lorne and bus hub with sound design principles could be built with future residential presence in mind. That's a big one, we need to increase the numbers of those living downtown in all income brackets. Rose and Broad is a great place for that. as well. The bus hub on Lorne wouldn't hinder much either as there is currently no active street level uses on the East side of the block anyway.

I live in The Towns and I support the retail on Chuka a lot. I believe the Greens/Towns area is the closest thing Regina has to the concept of the "15 minute city". I can walk to get supper, groceries, drugstore, library, gym, yoga, doctor, dentist etc. Also with the increase in industrial tenants East of bypass such as AGT and more to come in the future, one could bike or drive to work in 5 minutes. So yeah, I support suburban retail if done right. I also use transit to get to work in the South end and frequently use it to support downtown businesses as well. Contrary to popular belief, I can get to work or downtown from my East end home on 1 bus without transfer. I think we can build a better downtown and also support walkable neighbourhoods, as long as we continue to invest in transit. It doesn't have to be one or the other.

BrutallyDishonest2 · #42 Posted **Oct 25, 2020, 1:01 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by cityboy

I support what Namarind wants to do on 11th and Lorne

So you support a scam?

cityboy · #43 Posted **Oct 28, 2020, 8:03 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by djforsberg

I’m not against suburban developments and I agree the Greens is an improvement. I just wish we did developments in a smarter, more well-thought out and sustainable way. You know, instead of kicking the can down the road.

We definitely agree on principle I think. The vison of city hall leaves a lot to be desired. Perhaps we will see some new blood and fresh ideas in the near future.

cityboy · #44 Posted **Oct 28, 2020, 8:11 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2

So you support a scam?

I'm talking about the concept of a mixed income residential tower, with a food store on ground level as something that would be beneficial to the long term vitality of downtown. I'm not endorsing Namarind, or their business plan, per se. But really, man. You're such a troll on here and you literally never have anything good to say. Piss off, already.

BrutallyDishonest2 · #45 Posted **Oct 28, 2020, 11:47 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by cityboy

I'm talking about the concept of a mixed income residential tower, with a food store on ground level as something that would be beneficial to the long term vitality of downtown. I'm not endorsing Namarind, or their business plan, per se. But really, man. You're such a troll on here and you literally never have anything good to say. Piss off, already.

If you don't like criticism of your bad ideas, stay off the internet.

cityboy · #46 Posted **Oct 29, 2020, 1:49 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2

If you don't like criticism of your bad ideas, stay off the internet.

Judging by your track record on here, it would appear that everybody except you has nothing but bad ideas. It's very clear that you follow a pattern of alternating between criticizing others and attempting to impress with your "insider" knowledge. That's ok, you do you bud, if it makes you happy.

StealthGirl · #47 Posted **Oct 29, 2020, 9:50 PM**

Masters has come out this week to talk about her first major infrastructure spend: a new aquatic centre by 2024. There is a ton of space between New Mosaic and the old Taylor Field. They could put a replacement next to the Lawson. Great possibilities considering lots of demand for indoor pools, a waterpark and competitive lanes. This would be year round instead of Fougere's dream in Wascana.

BrutallyDishonest2 · #48 Posted **Oct 29, 2020, 11:28 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by cityboy

Judging by your track record on here, it would appear that everybody except you has nothing but bad ideas. It's very clear that you follow a pattern of alternating between criticizing others and attempting to impress with your "insider" knowledge. That's ok, you do you bud, if it makes you happy.

As opposed to your lack contribution, writ large.

one_brick_at_a_time · #49 Posted **Oct 30, 2020, 12:01 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by StealthGirl

Masters has come out this week to talk about her first major infrastructure spend: a new aquatic centre by 2024. There is a ton of space between New Mosaic and the old Taylor Field. They could put a replacement next to the Lawson. Great possibilities considering lots of demand for indoor pools, a waterpark and competitive lanes. This would be year round instead of Fougere's dream in Wascana.

Would love having an expanded indoor waterpark/Lawson for central/inner city to compliment the outdoor water park being built in Wascana Park.

BrutallyDishonest2 · #50 Posted **Oct 30, 2020, 12:05 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by one_brick_at_a_time

Would love having an expanded indoor waterpark/Lawson for central/inner city to compliment the outdoor water park being built in Wascana Park.

I think it's very unlikely with the bad outdoor facility under construction.

I feel like they should just renovate the Lawson and be done with it.

StealthGirl · #51 Posted **Oct 30, 2020, 4:37 PM**

Removing the cobbles and putting traffic on Scarth? Not so sure about that.

https://www.cjme.com/2020/10/29/masters-looking-to-get-regina-moving/

Bob Pierce and Mitchell Howse are not participating in the mayoral debate on Nov02. I don't think either is a serious contender so no loss there.

LittleBoy · #52 Posted **Oct 30, 2020, 4:50 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by StealthGirl

Removing the cobbles and putting traffic on Scarth? Not so sure about that.

https://www.cjme.com/2020/10/29/masters-looking-to-get-regina-moving/

Bob Pierce and Mitchell Howse are not participating in the mayoral debate on Nov02. I don't think either is a serious contender so no loss there.

Well she just lost my vote. It seems like her and Fougere would benefit from just keeping their mouths shut.

Acting like you're hoping to revitalize downtown and then trying to mess with the best part of downtown is so self sabotaging.

HomeInMyShoes · #53 Posted **Oct 30, 2020, 4:51 PM**

Not sure about traffic on Scarth either. It's certainly an interesting proposition. It could make the incredibly awkward Scarth/12th intersection more useable. Maybe remove vehicular traffic to the square and open Scarth as an option.

I had to direct an old lady who was quite distressed when she managed to get between the barriers and the actual park space a few weeks back. The issue was that the posts that are supposed to be up to prevent cars at the East end of the park weren't up and she drove through there and then couldn't figure out why there was no way out when the posts further West were up. Then when I told her to turn around go out and turn left onto the square and go up Cornwall street she proceeded to turn right and then have a difficult time with the lack of street lights facing her when she was going through the Scarth/12th intersection.

The design of the square is terrible and it started with the compromise of limited traffic.

StealthGirl · #54 Posted **Oct 30, 2020, 8:18 PM**

She is also only one vote on council. She'd have to get all of council to buy in on Scarth Street and I'm not seeing that happen, esp given traffic in the summer. Instead of Pat's patio, the city should've created a pedestrian mall from Vic to 11th and built it up.

Draftsman · #55 Posted **Oct 31, 2020, 1:24 AM**

They should spend $12 million to renovate the Scarth Street Mall, using the pavers that they will tear up from Pat's Patio in order to rebuild the street that used to be there. Heck, they can even rename Scarth Street Mall to 'Fougere's Patio' in 10 years time.

I am worried about this civic election. There are too many people running for mayor (nine!) many who shouldn't have a chance, but the meager votes will get split up and we could end up with some bozo (Flegel) as mayor. Please, be sure to vote however you choose, whoever you think will be good for our city. Get your friends and family to vote too. It really sucks to see Regina stagnate, while the 'Paris of the Prairies'

seems to have a lot on the go.

BrutallyDishonest2 · #56 Posted **Oct 31, 2020, 10:19 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by djforsberg

Sandra Masters had an AMA on Reddit and skirted around questions about who is financing her campaign. This is a red flag for me.

She's probably got most of the business community on her side. Rumor has it that Gavin Semple is the main funder.

Draftsman · #57 Posted **Nov 1, 2020, 12:28 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2

She's probably got most of the business community on her side. Rumor has it that Gavin Semple is the main funder.

I wasn't going to vote for her anyway, but hearing this rumor now, for sure I won't be voting for her

BrutallyDishonest2 · #58 Posted **Nov 1, 2020, 2:56 AM**

The important thing to keep in mind is that Fougere is an awful, awful man who is poisoning city administration.

Festivus · #59 Posted **Nov 2, 2020, 1:35 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2

The important thing to keep in mind is that Fougere is an awful, awful man who is poisoning city administration.

In what way? (asking genuinely).

one_brick_at_a_time · #60 Posted **Nov 2, 2020, 1:42 PM**

I think either the City needs to act on replacing the brick on Scarth, or rip it all up if no investment is planned. I understand the purpose of Scarth Street Mall, but it looks like shit. With the Globe restoration/redo coming soon in the new year and the fact that there will be a new entrance podium built/added on the Scarth Street side, it would be a perfect time for the City to work on Scarth and get it all done at the same time. I would love the same brick that is on the plaza continued up Scarth to the Cornwall Centre. It would brighten and modernize Scarth Street. I also want more trees and a center Fountain in the former raised spot.