Quote:
Originally Posted by GenWhy?
You mean the 150 social housing units? Unless you're suggesting the mayor is useless in his 1 vote where he could have made a recommendation to Staff to explore allowing an extra 5 floors which could allow another 2 levels (maybe) of social housing? I'm not sure policy supports that tho - which could result in this not being built at all for a decade, maybe.
|
I'd be happier if the City actually retained title to land like this, rather than sell it off. We've seen time and time again that wildly inflating land prices are making it impossible to deliver true affordable housing so why lose control of it? The City should easily be able to build affordable housing on those lands themselves.
Threaded Mode