HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Aug 31, 2020, 8:32 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
Neither a conventional nor a high speed train would ever be comparable with flying. A full HSR system would still take 5ish hours to get from Winnipeg to Calgary. That is more than double a flight. A system that allowed a conventional train to get close to their top speed would take somewhere in the 8-10 hour range. HSR doesn't make sense for distances over 800 km. Conventional rail (as a service people will find usable) doesn't make sense over about 500.
8-10 hours is faster than driving. How many people drive that distance? The reality is, HSR isn't going to be built on the prairie provinces until a line is built and operational for over a decade between Toronto and Montreal. That is not going to happen till HFR is built and shown to be successful. So, that is at least 30+ years from now before the prairies will even be considered for it. Should 2 of the 5 largest cities in the west wait 30+ years for rail to return? Should 5 of the largest cities have virtually no real service because "HSR or nothing?"
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:16 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.