HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10541  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2020, 10:55 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Arbutus? Let's hope so - in 10-15 years, the M-Line'll extend all the way to UBC, and then that bus loop will become a parking lot for taxis.
Sorry I meant Cambie-Broadway. It's a big ground level footprint, but I'm wondering what's possible now that the station is built and active.
     
     
  #10542  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2020, 11:19 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,489
That would be good planning. Haven't seen anything about that possibility, but it could be complicated by any potential building having to straddle the loop and greenway. The King Ed condo contilevers over the station, so no weight rests on the station footings.
     
     
  #10543  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 12:40 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
Probably easier to just build on top of the loop - not much point in having it once the B-Line is gone.
     
     
  #10544  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 2:51 AM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
i still don't really like how there is only 1 entry/exit though...
I feel like the one entry/exit design of Arbutus station will be a pain in the ass until the Millennium line reaches UBC. Why? Because until the Skytrain reaches UBC, Arbutus station will actually serve as a huge transfer station for the 99. After the Skytrain reaches UBC then Arbutus station will have less people transferring on buses to UBC. I think that the design of the station will be geared towards building for its functions after the UBC extension so I am personally okay with it for the time being.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
I'd put Arbutus Station on the same level as Oak, maybe lower; even with the Greenway/tram, I don't see it growing big enough to need a second entrance. Maybe add a couple of K.O. panels and that's it.

Wonder if the tram could go under the subway? Or does the cost outweigh the benefit?
I would bet that the cost would outweigh the benefit but I am happy to be wrong .
__________________
There is a housing crisis, and we simply need to speak up about it.

Pinterest - I use this social media platform to easily add pictures into my posts on this forum. Plus there are great architecture and city photos out there as well.
     
     
  #10545  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 5:27 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Arbutus? Let's hope so - in 10-15 years, the M-Line'll extend all the way to UBC, and then that bus loop will become a parking lot for taxis.
This is why building the entire extension in 1 go makes more sense. You are not building, then tearing down stuff.
     
     
  #10546  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 5:54 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
It's easy to rip up asphalt... waiting another decade or two for a complete $6B ($9B+ probably, if you add rising land values and inflation), not so much.
     
     
  #10547  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 6:13 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,980
yeah, its better to get this section done than to say no thanks we'll wait till you fund it all the way to UBC, that could be 2040.
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #10548  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 6:17 AM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
It's easy to rip up asphalt... waiting another decade or two for a complete $6B ($9B+ probably, if you add rising land values and inflation), not so much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
yeah, its better to get this section done than to say no thanks we'll wait till you fund it all the way to UBC, that could be 2040.
I was not suggesting delaying it. I was suggesting biting the bullet and build it all as soon as they planned to start this section. Maybe with Stimulus money we know is coming from the Feds, they could.

I do wonder what the real difference in costs for the section not being done wil be when they build it vs now.
     
     
  #10549  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 7:05 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
Except that a full UBC extension costs $6-7 billion; we have $3 billion. The entire point of Arbutus is that we literally can't build it all in one go, no matter how much we want to. Contractors don't work for free.

WRT the feds, they've already given $600 million to TransLink's operations, and I wouldn't expect much more for anything unless it's shovel-ready... which Arbutus-UBC is not.
     
     
  #10550  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 2:15 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,529
Lincoln station was added to the Evergreen line after construction started, right? Hopefully common sense prevails soon enough.

I'm surprised UBC isn't going "Look at YorkU, they're in the middle of an industrial wasteland flanked by hydro corridors and freeways and they get TWO opulent subway stations on a $3B line that doesn't stop anywhere remotely urban"
     
     
  #10551  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 2:26 PM
dpogue dpogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 764
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Lincoln station was added to the Evergreen line after construction started, right? Hopefully common sense prevails soon enough.
No, it was added after the original plan was set out, maybe after the RFP had closed, but definitely before construction had actually started.

The problem that everyone is glossing over is that we have not done the prerequisite work for the UBC extension past Arbutus. That's in-progress, but will take several years to complete. We don't have detailed geological samples yet, we don't have community consultation done, we don't have station locations decided and land acquisition done, we don't have detailed construction designs, etc.

All the agreements and partnerships and funding to build to Arbutus are ready. It would end up further delaying the project to tear all that up and start over for the full extension to UBC right now. Not to mention the lack of funding for the complete project.
     
     
  #10552  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 3:48 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,529
I think at least the station locations are obvious:

Macdonald (SW corner)
Alma (Broadway SE corner)
Jericho (future a-la Capstan way station - somewhere north of 8th ave)
Sasamat (10th Ave SE corner)
UBC (University Blvd east of E Mall)

Hasn't this been studied to death since the 1990's...
     
     
  #10553  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 4:27 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,540
^^^^

It has, and it will come. This stuff is damn slow, at least there is an active project underway.
     
     
  #10554  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 5:33 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 39,980
isn't Translink obligated to complete the surrey expo line extension too before it can think of UBC?
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #10555  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 7:16 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,529
Ugh, instead of "every resident in Metro Vancouver gets x-dollars of subway investment within 5km of their home" whether they use it or not, how bout they build it where the ridership demands it...

Also, why is Fairview station not on Oak but on Laurel? It's not like there isn't a underutilized site right at the SW corner...
     
     
  #10556  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 7:27 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,540
Closer to VGH is my guess, and they are building on some pretty low density land IIRC.
     
     
  #10557  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 7:56 PM
Anorak Anorak is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
I think at least the station locations are obvious:

Macdonald (SW corner)
Alma (Broadway SE corner)
Jericho (future a-la Capstan way station - somewhere north of 8th ave)
Sasamat (10th Ave SE corner)
UBC (University Blvd east of E Mall)

Hasn't this been studied to death since the 1990's...
I believe the Stadium and Wesbrook village would also be part of the plan.
     
     
  #10558  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 8:23 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Also, why is Fairview station not on Oak but on Laurel? It's not like there isn't a underutilized site right at the SW corner...
Laurel is more central than Oak for the VGH campus. The only person in the city that might think Oak is a better location is the owner of that building on the SW corner.
     
     
  #10559  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 8:42 PM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,639
I hope they add some provisions for pedestrian scrambles at major stations like at Granville, Cambie, and Arbutus.
     
     
  #10560  
Old Posted Jul 23, 2020, 8:51 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,529
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Laurel is more central than Oak for the VGH campus. The only person in the city that might think Oak is a better location is the owner of that building on the SW corner.

You got me lol. It just seems more intuitive if the platform was mid-block, with separate entrances at Laurel and Oak.

I guess the Oak street buses will loop around the block as the terminus of their route to facilitate connections to the station.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:57 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.