Quote:
Originally Posted by bikegypsy
How? You're not explaining how it's easier.
|
Let me guess. You don't use transit much, and have never accessed the airport by transit. Unless you live near the airport, Tremblay station is station is substantially more accessible for a lot of Ottawa. Most importantly the downtown core. Transit aside, it's also more accessible by car too. And since HFR would be a through service, Fallowfield would function similarly in the west end.
I actually agree that YOW is a fantastic airport. But as long as there are more options at YUL and more competitive pricing, easier access of that airport will have an impact on where people choose to fly from.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominion301
Regarding HFR, it’s still at least 8-10 years away, if ever. It’ll be interesting to see post-Covid if the government will want to spend billions on new infrastructure projects as stimulus or move toward deficit reduction. If it’s the latter, HFR will be even longer off.
|
There's already been comments that they are pursuing this more actively. And the $70 million currently being spent on "pre-procurement activities" wasn't meant merely as distraction. I would be very surprised if it's not part of any recovery plan. See comments here:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics...ady-projects-for-post-shutdown-stimulus/
Moreover, this is the long term direction. Look at France. They made the bailout of Air France conditional on a commitment to substantially reduce domestic short-haul flying and increase integration with rail:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-52527517
I also expect carbon footprint accounting for corporate travel to eventually become a policy for public servants. This is picking up elsewhere. And this would itself impact traffic to Toronto and Montreal a bit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominion301
I also can never understand why in Ottawa we want to seek “solutions” to reduce our access to our already meagre international air service...that was on the verge of actually improving. Now just getting FRA back next year will be an accomplishment.
|
I can never understand how people can claim to be serious about climate change and completely ignore the impact of short haul flying. Nobody is saying flying should be curtailed substantially at YOW, but there is an argument for feeder traffic to move by rail. Especially feeder traffic to YUL.
I'm also happy to see YUL bolstered over YYZ, with Ottawa's feed enabling some destinations that might normally only be feasible out of Toronto.
For YOW itself, the advent of narrowbody long-haul should enable YOW to replace that traffic with more long-haul destinations. For example, YOW should be able to support a daily 321LR to CDG, AMS and MUC. Maybe YOW's managers will be more motivated to chase down that business when they lose some short-haul traffic.