Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU Diablo
This is rich coming from the poster who was bitching and ranting on this very same forum about the increase of traffic near his office and complaining how the time it takes him to get to TSRA has exponentially increased over time. Or how adding permanent bicycle lanes to the Western stretch of Roosevelt was a bad idea because it would be "inconvenient" for HIM and HIS commute to the office. How the City would never do this and the wants of "many" would clearly overtake the "wants of the few"? I will give you credit though, you moved your office and it's no longer "your" backyard/neighborhood.
Dude, take a look in the mirror and stop thumbing your nose at people. You sound like a damn hypocrite.
|
If you want to argue about this I have all day, though in the grand scheme all of what we are discussing is irrelevant. The world is going to do what the world is going to do despite what we think.
Yes, downtown became something I wanted to visit rather than be tied to. So I moved. I still own a few condos spread around between the 7's and I will continue to buy in Garfield and Oakland, that won't change. I just don't want to be there anymore unless it's for recreation.
Yes, I think the bike lanes were a bad idea and I still do. That has nothing to do with MY commute since I do not use Roosevelt on a regular basis. My office was on McKinley and I traveled 7th Avenue southbound and turned left on McKinley not Roosevelt. My objection to the bike lanes on Roosevelt is that they have the potential to cause traffic to pile up while people make left turns with no center lane. On the few occasions I did use Roosevelt and made a left turn on 4th Avenue heading southbound I felt like an enormous inconvenience. I am waiting for traffic to clear while I watch cars behind me pile up. Exactly what I expected to happen. You want to talk about the needs of the many? The MANY drivers needs outweigh the five nerds who ride a bike and think they need a bike lane on a small street like Roosvelt. It's not McDowell. And I'm not ambivalent to the needs of cyclists, I ride a lot.
I understand your point of view, but I disagree with it.