The forum will be temporarily closed soon for maintenance.
    
HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6861  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2020, 9:50 PM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Now this would have been a similar but much better art installation for Regent Street:

https://architizer.com/projects/augmented-structures/
They can put that one up on the side of the old Salt Lake Tribune/Neumont Building
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6862  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2020, 6:51 AM
Stenar's Avatar
Stenar Stenar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 3,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rileybo View Post
I actually really love those old apartments along 300 S, I’ll be heartbroken to see them go.
I also love the apartments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6863  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2020, 6:01 AM
SLC PopPunk SLC PopPunk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Posts: 112
Any word when Moda Lux will break ground? That's a huge infill project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6864  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2020, 10:48 AM
bob rulz bob rulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,609
Things are a little slow right now, so I figured I might as well upload a couple of pictures I took a few days ago.

Updated picture of the 95 State site (or, well, from about 3 days ago at least)


Two cranes!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6865  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2020, 6:37 PM
Pencil's Avatar
Pencil Pencil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 145
If you guys want weekly updates on the Broadway Apartments and Park Avenue in Sugar House check out this channel by Architecture Belgique, Inc. Here's their latest drone shot on the Broadway Apartments construction so far
https://youtu.be/6TJuIwLih_E
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6866  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 2:10 AM
Marvland's Avatar
Marvland Marvland is offline
SLC Lifer
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Fairpark
Posts: 674
Theater Tower

Talked to somebody who knows. Theater tower is real. Target is for it to be the cities tallest. Final drawings out in the next month or so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6867  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 2:47 AM
nushiof nushiof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvland View Post
Talked to somebody who knows. Theater tower is real. Target is for it to be the cities tallest. Final drawings out in the next month or so.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6868  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 3:02 AM
Atlas's Avatar
Atlas Atlas is offline
Space Magi
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvland View Post
Talked to somebody who knows. Theater tower is real. Target is for it to be the cities tallest. Final drawings out in the next month or so.
Woah! That's a good spot in the skyline for the city's new tallest. Can't wait to see what they have planned!
__________________
r/DevelopmentSLC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6869  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 3:05 AM
Always Sunny in SLC Always Sunny in SLC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marvland View Post
Talked to somebody who knows. Theater tower is real. Target is for it to be the cities tallest. Final drawings out in the next month or so.
Are you referring to Pantages?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6870  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 3:18 AM
Makid Makid is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,090
With the Theater Tower wanting to push higher, hopefully it will make Kensington raise their height.

As both are likely to be under construction around the same time, I do wonder if there will be any competition between the 2 projects to claim the tallest.

With Kensington already laying the gauntlet of 448' to the highest point, maybe the Theater Tower can shoot for 475' or dare we hope 500'...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6871  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 3:44 AM
Rileybo's Avatar
Rileybo Rileybo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 381
Well, if the beautiful theater is going to be irreversibly destroyed, I suppose the best case scenario is that it’s replaced by another decent skyscraper for the city. If only we could have our cake and eat it, too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6872  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 4:13 AM
michaelk michaelk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 12
Hi all, I am new to the forum. Do we know construction dates for the Theater Tower yet? How tall did this person say it would be?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6873  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 4:36 AM
Utah_Dave Utah_Dave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 698
Hey Orlando.... are you going to make me ask? I figured you would have posted a skyline massing with the theater tower at 475’ already?

You feeling ok? Hope you don’t have the Covid!




Preciate ya!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6874  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 4:46 AM
Atlas's Avatar
Atlas Atlas is offline
Space Magi
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelk View Post
Hi all, I am new to the forum. Do we know construction dates for the Theater Tower yet? How tall did this person say it would be?
Welcome! I don't think any dates are public and I'm guessing the tower has to go through some city approvals first, especially if they're going to request to build higher than the 375' height limit. There's also the still-controversial matter of the theater demolition itself.

I also wonder if there will be any substantial overall design changes to the tower. I quite liked the design of the base of the tower but the rest was underwhelming. Here are some images for reference:
__________________
r/DevelopmentSLC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6875  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 4:54 AM
michaelk michaelk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 12
Thanks Atlas! It is not a bad looking tower but I hope they spice it up with some curves, etc. It certainly is not a new tallest in that image. They will have to add at least a hundred feet to it if they want it to be a new tallest, right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6876  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 5:17 AM
Atlas's Avatar
Atlas Atlas is offline
Space Magi
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,989
Quote:
Originally Posted by michaelk View Post
Thanks Atlas! It is not a bad looking tower but I hope they spice it up with some curves, etc. It certainly is not a new tallest in that image. They will have to add at least a hundred feet to it if they want it to be a new tallest, right?
According to this website (which was new to me), the Kearns building is 144 ft tall, and the rendering makes it look like the Pantages Tower is about twice that height, so around 288 ft. Wells Fargo is 422 ft, so it would need to be more than 134 feet taller than the old rendering.

So it would need to be about three Kearns buildings tall instead of two
__________________
r/DevelopmentSLC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6877  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 5:28 AM
Orlando's Avatar
Orlando Orlando is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 4,122
As much as I'd like to see both Kensington and Theater Tower be built to these proposed heights, I still think this is a race between the two, and the built height will be less than the original proposed height. Sorry, but how many times have we heard of tower proposals and then they vanish out of thin air, or we find out that when they actually do get built, they lopped off a few floors, ie. Boyer's tower on State, and now the Brinshore development. Boyer's went from 25 to 21? and Brinshore went from 17 to 13. Brinshore hasn't even started construction yet. It makes me nervous about that one, too.

Utah Dave, I'll get the new height of the Theater Tower modeled.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6878  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 5:30 AM
michaelk michaelk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlas View Post
According to this website (which was new to me), the Kearns building is 144 ft tall, and the rendering makes it look like the Pantages Tower is about twice that height, so around 288 ft. Wells Fargo is 422 ft, so it would need to be more than 134 feet taller than the old rendering.

So it would need to be about three Kearns buildings tall instead of two
wow, I can't wait to see the newest drawings of this beast of a tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6879  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 7:36 AM
mattreedah mattreedah is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 251
Sure

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
As much as I'd like to see both Kensington and Theater Tower be built to these proposed heights, I still think this is a race between the two, and the built height will be less than the original proposed height. Sorry, but how many times have we heard of tower proposals and then they vanish out of thin air, or we find out that when they actually do get built, they lopped off a few floors, ie. Boyer's tower on State, and now the Brinshore development. Boyer's went from 25 to 21? and Brinshore went from 17 to 13. Brinshore hasn't even started construction yet. It makes me nervous about that one, too.

Utah Dave, I'll get the new height of the Theater Tower modeled.
I wouldn’t worry about that too much. I’d much rather have two at 250 than one at 500. What Salt Lake needs is infill in its park-sized parking lots downtown. I’m in Phoenix now and it’s amazing what 3 or 4 15-20 story buildings can do to downtown vibrancy. I don’t want SLC to look like downtown OKC anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6880  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 12:41 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,294
I agree with you Mattedah that nothing makes for a more vibrant downtown than a bunch of 250-foot residential towers. The more the merrier! Though I would like to see those 250 -foot towers as 300-foot towers, of course along with a healthy mix of mid-rises. Seriously, I share Orlando's and many other forumers impatience at this point as far as wanting some sleek 500 footers breaking Salt Lake's glass ceiling. All indicators point to Salt Lake City and its Wasatch Front becoming one of North America's great Metropolises this coming century. I think it's high time that its skyline starts to reflect its upcoming ambitions as one of America's boomtowns. I'm also in the camp of those that have stated that a couple of 500 footers at this point would not throw the skylines balance out of whack. That would be true especially if both Pantages and Kensignton were new tallest in that 500-foot range. Given their chosen locations, that would make for a truly beautiful massing effect of Salt Lake's skyline. Throw in the current towers under construction like 95 S. State and the upcoming towers such as the CCH, and a continued future buildup, Salt Lake's skyline aesthetics are going to start to really get attractive. Add it's unsurpassed backdrop and we would have the makings of one of America's prettiest future skylines.

I also agree as does everyone I think, OKC's Devon at a total of around 844ft. definitely doesn't fit well into OKC's current skyline. It's a beautiful structure but it desperately needs some 500-600ft. company. It sticks out like the proverbial sore thumb, but I don't think a couple of 500 footers in Salt Lake's skyline at this point would have anywhere near the same effect, quite the opposite. IMO, it would be a very attractive enhancement and would encourage the development of more 400-600 foot towers.

There are a few more mature skylines around the West that are quite boring or are a bit of a hot mess. Taken tower for tower I think Salt Lake's design aesthetic is on the right track. There's variety in styles without too much of the same dated 70's vibe. I'm all for having one or two COB's or Key Bank Towers, just not a whole downtown full of them like some of our neighbors such as San Fran. that boomed during those lacking design decades. Another unfortunate example for me is Vancouver with its deluge of cloned by the dozens residential towers. To be fair, San Francisco will eventually camouflage the past with its continued buildup. Austin's current path would be more my desired example. So, bring on a variety of heights and designs for downtown Salt Lake City with some new tallest sprinkled in the mix...Yeeeees!

Last edited by delts145; Mar 4, 2020 at 1:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:01 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.