Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City
The ground floor plans look to be replicating the sort of public space that have been built in Telus Gardens.
|
I don't think so. The plan here appears to show no more than the potential for a couple of small coffee/pre-prepared sandwich kiosks with some open seating inside the office lobby itself. These kinds of modest amenities appear to be mainly for the convenience of workers in this building on their coffee breaks, not a real dining destination for the wider public.
Telus Garden, by contrast, offers a huge, two-storey, fully-functioning, stand-alone restuarant, including an expansive patio. This large restuarant, Glowbal, is a major dining/entertainment destination, drawing crowds of people from all over the city and beyond. The plans above do not appear to have any potential to replicate anything remotely similar to the amenities and attractions provided by Telus Garden.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City
The "urban fun-seekers" might like it, but if they don't there's a big supermarket / food court / retail space going a block away on the other side of West Georgia in the Post, and presumably one day something where the Bay Parkade redevelopment happens. There's also a new restaurant, bar and café in the Westbank building across the lane.
|
Those are
other developments, not this one. As I said,
this development appears it will provide no more reason for urban fun-seekers to venture further east along West Georgia Street, if all it has is a coffee kiosk or two inside its lobby. The fact that all the other nearby developments have created (or will create) far more substantial and robust urban offerings only underscores how little this particular development will be contributing to the area.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City
Neither of the units on Richards Street today are retail uses, and haven't been for years, so adding one of the new retail units there will change the street for the better.
|
What I said is that this redevelopment "likely represents a net loss of
potential urban amenities." The two buildings on Richards Street (one being a 3-storey heritage building in need of love) possess many thousands of square feet of
potential urban amenities. This redevelopment, by contrast, is offering to permanently replace that potential Richards Street space with an actual 254 sq.ft. retail unit. If that is the case, this redevelopment, as I said, does indeed represent a net loss in "
potential new shops, restaurants, entertainment destinations, etc., for our downtown core."