HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #521  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2020, 2:03 AM
Cypherus's Avatar
Cypherus Cypherus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,759
So by agreeing to a regional license, Mr. Magoo appears to have taken a lesser stance when faced with legal issues from Uber and pressure from John Horgan to back down. At least he can tell the Taxi Cartel that "he tried".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #522  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2020, 5:36 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
but forcing ride hailing to have wheelchair vehicles is untenable as well. since it is based on using your own personal vehicle, forcing that onto them is not what the service is about.
I think there's a valid argument to be made for an accessible vehicle requirement. Sure, you have to use your own vehicle, but in order to meet civic goals of accessibility it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to require the ride hailing companies to incentivize drivers to buy and drive accessible vehicles. Incentives can be adjusted as needed until a mandated percentage of vehicles are accessible. After all, we require private developers to adhere to accessibility requirements via building codes, and transportation is certainly a critical piece of the accessibility landscape.

Accessibility of infrastructure seems like a waste until you need it, and then suddenly it becomes very, very important.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #523  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2020, 4:20 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
I think there's a valid argument to be made for an accessible vehicle requirement. Sure, you have to use your own vehicle, but in order to meet civic goals of accessibility it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to require the ride hailing companies to incentivize drivers to buy and drive accessible vehicles. Incentives can be adjusted as needed until a mandated percentage of vehicles are accessible. After all, we require private developers to adhere to accessibility requirements via building codes, and transportation is certainly a critical piece of the accessibility landscape.

Accessibility of infrastructure seems like a waste until you need it, and then suddenly it becomes very, very important.
Yep the PTB could have easily forced some minimum requirements for accessible rides to any ride hailing company, and monitor compliance.

Uber/Lyft/etc would be free to develop their own incentives as to how those requirements get met (Free market!).

Ride hailing has been shown to increase vehicle miles driven and congestion too, I would have liked to see them require certain levels of fuel economy, hybrids, EVs, etc.

Instead, we get a silly Class 4 requirement.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #524  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2020, 4:59 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Yep the PTB could have easily forced some minimum requirements for accessible rides to any ride hailing company, and monitor compliance.

Uber/Lyft/etc would be free to develop their own incentives as to how those requirements get met (Free market!).

Ride hailing has been shown to increase vehicle miles driven and congestion too, I would have liked to see them require certain levels of fuel economy, hybrids, EVs, etc.

Instead, we get a silly Class 4 requirement.
Even a Class 4 licence doesn't mean you understand what a bike lane is. [source]
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #525  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2020, 5:56 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
Even a Class 4 licence doesn't mean you understand what a bike lane is. [source]
Saw that, but interesting to see the point about pickups for disabled people. They could potentially need that curbside pickup. It's a failure in bike lane design too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #526  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2020, 6:14 PM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cypherus View Post
So by agreeing to a regional license, Mr. Magoo appears to have taken a lesser stance when faced with legal issues from Uber and pressure from John Horgan to back down. At least he can tell the Taxi Cartel that "he tried".
I think that was the point this whole time.

Something tells me that the Taxi Cartel probably donated generously to McCallum's campaign.
__________________
There is a housing crisis, and we simply need to speak up about it.

Pinterest - I use this social media platform to easily add pictures into my posts on this forum. Plus there are great architecture and city photos out there as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #527  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2020, 11:10 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by scryer View Post
I think that was the point this whole time.

Something tells me that the Taxi Cartel probably donated generously to McCallum's campaign.
McCallum is just an idiot, not sure he needs a reason to be a tool on ride hailing. How's his Grand Canals of Whalley project coming along?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #528  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2020, 8:32 PM
dreambrother808 dreambrother808 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
McCallum is just an idiot, not sure he needs a reason to be a tool on ride hailing. How's his Grand Canals of Whalley project coming along?
This is also a very public issue. Why would he be willing to take so much heat when it is easier to skate under the radar in municipal politics? The taxi lobby surely can't represent the majority of public opinion in Surrey.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #529  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 4:31 AM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,073
Quote:
Originally Posted by dreambrother808 View Post
The taxi lobby surely can't represent the majority of public opinion in Surrey.
Can I be the one to point out the stereotyping elephant in the room?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #530  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 5:56 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,687
Uber has to get more drivers on the system.

This afternoon I tried to catch a Uber from Collingwood area to the airport. It would should 10-15 minutes wait and then time up because no driver was available and accepting the ride. Needed to try to book the trip about 3-4 times before I ended up getting a driver. They need more drivers immediately.

Almost ready to drive out to the airport and pay for parking. No way was I going to feed money into the taxi industry the way it has been handling this.

The driver I had, was on his first day driving for uber. So this will improve, but the last thing we want is to go back to taxi that would be a step backwards.

Arrived at the Saskatoon airport. The wait for an uber her was 3 minutes. Never had a problem or a long wait getting a driver in Saskatoon, Las Vegas, Miami, St. Louis, New York, Seattle, Cincinnati, San Francisco, Montreal, Dallas or LA. Vancouver will eventually catch up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #531  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 6:02 AM
libtard's Avatar
libtard libtard is offline
Dahvie Fan
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,307
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
Uber has to get more drivers on the system.

This afternoon I tried to catch a Uber from Collingwood area to the airport. It would should 10-15 minutes wait and then time up because no driver was available and accepting the ride. Needed to try to book the trip about 3-4 times before I ended up getting a driver. They need more drivers immediately.

Almost ready to drive out to the airport and pay for parking. No way was I going to feed money into the taxi industry the way it has been handling this.

The driver I had, was on his first day driving for uber. So this will improve, but the last thing we want is to go back to taxi that would be a step backwards.

Arrived at the Saskatoon airport. The wait for an uber her was 3 minutes. Never had a problem or a long wait getting a driver in Saskatoon, Las Vegas, Miami, St. Louis, New York, Seattle, Cincinnati, San Francisco, Montreal, Dallas or LA. Vancouver will eventually catch up.
I don’t know if Vancouver will catch up. How many of those other cities you mentioned require drivers to get a professional drivers license? Uber is most useful when it’s drivers reach critical mass with a ton of them on the road. Having the class 4 license requirement severely hampers that plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #532  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 7:06 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
Vancouver will eventually catch up.
this is exactly it. the Class 4 requirement hinders the quick adoption for Uber.

everyone needs to keep in mind, we are one of the few places that require a professional licence, and we are also any years late to the game. it takes time to catch up.

it has only been just over 1 week.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #533  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2020, 9:07 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
This afternoon I tried to catch a Uber from Collingwood area to the airport. It would should 10-15 minutes wait and then time up because no driver was available and accepting the ride. Needed to try to book the trip about 3-4 times before I ended up getting a driver.
If you're in Collingwood then why not just take the Skytrain? Sounds like it might have ended up being faster after all the booking attempts. I think we're very fortunate to live in a city that has rapid transit right to the airport.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #534  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 5:18 AM
moosejaw moosejaw is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Miami
Posts: 482
Miami was a mess during superbowl last night
It took me two hours to get home from a LAX -FLL flight
FLL wait times are up to 15 minutes as they are not allowed to enter the airport limits unless they have a confirmed ride. This gives taxis an advantage
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #535  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2020, 9:10 PM
EastVanMark EastVanMark is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
Yep, it's official!

DailyHive on the story
Welcome to 2012 Vancouver!

That world renowned metropolis of Saskatoon only beat us by a year in adopting ridesharing.

Last edited by EastVanMark; Feb 4, 2020 at 9:25 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #536  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2020, 1:03 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,586
...and in news that will surprise no one

Quote:
The taxi industry is promising to continue its fight against Uber and Lyft after a judge rejected a bid to grant an injunction against the companies pending a legal challenge of the approval process that allowed them to operate in Metro Vancouver.

B.C. Supreme Court Justice Veronica Jackson said the Vancouver Taxi Association failed to establish that an independent regulator used an uneven playing field in allowing the two companies to operate as of Jan. 23.

“The launch of Uber and Lyft in Vancouver did not arrive unannounced,” Jackson said Thursday.

Virtually all municipalities have had trouble providing an adequate number of taxis at bar-closing time, rush hour and for sporting events, while smaller communities have faced challenges in attracting the industry, Jackson said.

“The public interest favours the status quo,” she said, adding consultations and discussions over ride-hailing services have gone on for seven years in B.C. Half a million people have registered for an app with Uber, which has 800 drivers.

A judicial review, which could be months away, would not be in the taxi industry’s favour, she suggested.

...

The same judge is scheduled to announce her decision Friday in another ride-hailing case involving Uber, which sought an injunction against the City of Surrey for fining drivers and the company $500 a day for operating without a business licence while refusing to provide licences.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #537  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2020, 3:42 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
...and in news that will surprise no one

The taxi industry is promising to continue its fight against Uber and Lyft...
at least the judge got things right. not unknown, lots of issues with taxis, and people have been consulted for so long.

the taxi industry had 7yrs to make us like them, they made us continue to hate them. it is their own fault.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #538  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2020, 4:16 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,616
And the Uber/Surrey injunction will probably get announced tomorrow.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #539  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2020, 6:10 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,616
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #540  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2020, 7:59 PM
cyclinginvancouver cyclinginvancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 85
Quote:
February 7, 2020 Update:
Board Announces Additional Decisions on Ride Hailing Applications
The Passenger Transportation Board, an independent licensing tribunal, is mandated to make decisions on applications relating to passenger directed vehicles in British Columbia, including ride hailing authorizations.

The Board has completed its review of five additional applications from ride hailing companies:

Parhar, Garrindar Singh (Apt Rides) has been approved to operate in Region 1: Lower Mainland, Whistler.
Kabu Ride Inc. has been approved to operate in Region 1: Lower Mainland, Whistler; Region 2: Capital Regional District; Region 3: Vancouver Island, excluding CRD; Region 4: Okanagan-Kootenays-Cariboo; and Region 5: BC North Central & Other Regions of BC.
The Board has declined to approve the application of Azad, Payam (Transroad, Transroad Airport Shuttle) to operate in Region 1: Lower Mainland, Whistler.
The Board has declined to approve the application of Inorbis Corporation to operate in Region 1: Lower Mainland, Whistler; Region 2: Capital Regional District; Region 3: Vancouver Island, excluding CRD; Region 4: Okanagan-Kootenays-Cariboo; and Region 5: BC North Central & Other Regions of BC.
The Board has declined to approve the application of Tappcar Inc. to operate in Region 1: Lower Mainland, Whistler; Region 2: Capital Regional District; Region 3: Vancouver Island, excluding CRD; and Region 4: Okanagan-Kootenays-Cariboo.
https://www.ptboard.bc.ca/documents/Feb-7-2020-Third-Press-release.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:21 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.