Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698
I think there's a valid argument to be made for an accessible vehicle requirement. Sure, you have to use your own vehicle, but in order to meet civic goals of accessibility it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to require the ride hailing companies to incentivize drivers to buy and drive accessible vehicles. Incentives can be adjusted as needed until a mandated percentage of vehicles are accessible. After all, we require private developers to adhere to accessibility requirements via building codes, and transportation is certainly a critical piece of the accessibility landscape.
Accessibility of infrastructure seems like a waste until you need it, and then suddenly it becomes very, very important.
|
Yep the PTB could have easily forced some minimum requirements for accessible rides to any ride hailing company, and monitor compliance.
Uber/Lyft/etc would be free to develop their own incentives as to how those requirements get met (Free market!).
Ride hailing has been shown to increase vehicle miles driven and congestion too, I would have liked to see them require certain levels of fuel economy, hybrids, EVs, etc.
Instead, we get a silly Class 4 requirement.