HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive


One Chicago in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location
• Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1881  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2020, 12:38 AM
ORD2010 ORD2010 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 52
I have been loving watching this guy go up, what an incredible site, hopefully it spurs a barrage of development around it to go up and stretch downtown density west and north. I also hope we get a last minute height addition like 110 and wanda, push back to 1000'. Regardless, what an incredible development.
     
     
  #1882  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2020, 12:55 AM
rivernorthlurker rivernorthlurker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by ORD2010 View Post
I have been loving watching this guy go up, what an incredible site, hopefully it spurs a barrage of development around it to go up and stretch downtown density west and north. I also hope we get a last minute height addition like 110 and wanda, push back to 1000'. Regardless, what an incredible development.
Only 15 ft needed for 300m/supertall status. Come on!
     
     
  #1883  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2020, 5:54 PM
SolarWind's Avatar
SolarWind SolarWind is offline
Chicago
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
Four photos up, to the left in the background, does anyone know what Power's trailers are doing at 20 W Chicago? Is that a new development? I'm guessing they're for One Chicago but am open to being pleasantly surprised about more action nearby.
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryc View Post
Sadly they are just parked there - for this project.
January 8, 2020



A closer look.
     
     
  #1884  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2020, 8:19 PM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 1,094
Quote:
Originally Posted by rivernorthlurker View Post
Only 15 ft needed for 300m/supertall status. Come on!
Yeah, would be cool if it had supertall status, so that the city would have 8 supertalls instead of 7. Unfortunately, spires are far less common on residential buildings than on office or mixed-used buildings, so it's very unlikely for this near-supertall to get a surprise spire. It's not impossible though.

This will become the tallest residential building in Chicago. According to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_tallest_residential_buildings , if completed today, One Chicago would be the 20th tallest residential building in the world. That's pretty impressive!
     
     
  #1885  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2020, 12:18 AM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fulton Market/West Town, Chicago
Posts: 948
Quote:
Originally Posted by pianowizard View Post
This will become the tallest residential building in Chicago.
Vista might take umbrage with that...
     
     
  #1886  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2020, 12:21 AM
Fvn Fvn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 694
Quote:
Originally Posted by PittsburghPA View Post
Vista might take umbrage with that...
Vista has a hotel
     
     
  #1887  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2020, 12:29 AM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fulton Market/West Town, Chicago
Posts: 948
And One Chicago has a Whole Foods and Lifetime Fitness?? Sounds like semantics haha.
     
     
  #1888  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2020, 12:55 AM
Chi-Sky21 Chi-Sky21 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,354
That area has already seen some significant buildings this cycle...Chicago Ave out to the River especially around Moody... imagine if that moody land comes into play.....
     
     
  #1889  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2020, 3:49 PM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 1,094
Quote:
Originally Posted by PittsburghPA View Post
And One Chicago has a Whole Foods and Lifetime Fitness?? Sounds like semantics haha.
From the Wikipedia article I linked to earlier: "The Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat (CTBUH) defines a residential building as one where 85 percent or more of its total floor area is dedicated to residential usage."

More generally, on this website (click on "Tall building characteristics"), CTBUH states that: "A single-function tall building is defined as one where 85 percent or more of its total height is dedicated to a single function."

Based on these criteria, Vista is mixed-use, whereas One Chicago is residential.
     
     
  #1890  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2020, 4:07 PM
PittsburghPA PittsburghPA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fulton Market/West Town, Chicago
Posts: 948
Well then, I stand corrected..

Back on topic...So are they mining out the lower levels right now? This top down construction is such a foreign concept. I would love to see some pictures of this process taking place.

Looking to you, Nick!
     
     
  #1891  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2020, 5:09 PM
Bombardier Bombardier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 470
^They are not mining yet. They need to get the majority of the L1 slab in place before mining begins. It will probably start next month.
     
     
  #1892  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2020, 5:44 PM
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by rivernorthlurker View Post
Only 15 ft needed for 300m/supertall status. Come on!
I think the height is 971 not 969, it was recently updated by the CTBUH, so only 13 . That's like one floor

I know it's only two feet but shall we update the title?
     
     
  #1893  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2020, 8:32 PM
bhawk66 bhawk66 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 553
Quote:
Originally Posted by PittsburghPA View Post
Well then, I stand corrected..

Back on topic...So are they mining out the lower levels right now? This top down construction is such a foreign concept. I would love to see some pictures of this process taking place.

Looking to you, Nick!
lol doubt you'll get Nick going subterranean. He typically takes elevators of helicopters to work.

Agreed. Would be cool to see that action.
     
     
  #1894  
Old Posted Jan 12, 2020, 11:57 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,788
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatan View Post
I think the height is 971 not 969, it was recently updated by the CTBUH, so only 13 . That's like one floor
I can order a 13 ft spire, who here wants to scale this building and put it up?
     
     
  #1895  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2020, 1:14 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
^The hell with a spire; a flag pole would even do the trick!
     
     
  #1896  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2020, 2:15 PM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 1,094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyguy_7 View Post
^The hell with a spire; a flag pole would even do the trick!
A flag pole wouldn't count toward the structural height, as that would serve a functional purpose just like an antenna. Only a purely decorative spire would count.

There's still a little bit of hope that we'll get a supertall because according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Chicago_Square , "a final height has not been determined and a spire may be added to the design", although that statement is based on an Oct 2017 article.
     
     
  #1897  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2020, 2:42 PM
Skyguy_7 Skyguy_7 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,657
^ I'd argue a flag pole is decorative.

Also, there's no hope for a spire if you're source is Wikipedia, let alone an article from 2017.
     
     
  #1898  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2020, 7:39 PM
pianowizard pianowizard is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: SE Michigan, US
Posts: 1,094
From https://www.ctbuh.org/resource/height : "…the architectural top of the building, including spires, but not including antennae, signage, flagpoles or other functional-technical equipment. This measurement is the most widely utilized and is employed to define the CTBUH rankings of the World’s Tallest Buildings."

Regarding Wikipedia, I wouldn't assume that it's an unreliable source of information, because its accuracy is improved by the fact that it's constantly undergoing peer review. For this reason, Bill Nye the Science Guy has even said that he trusts Wikipedia more than traditional encyclopedias. I disagree with him for the less visited Wikipedia articles, but he's probably right for the frequently visited ones.

That article about One Chicago may not be very up-to-date, although it does have the latest height of 971 ft.
     
     
  #1899  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2020, 9:04 PM
Zapatan Zapatan is offline
DENNAB
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NY - Cali
Posts: 6,844
Title update anyone?

971 Feet / 296 meters
     
     
  #1900  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2020, 11:35 AM
chris08876's Avatar
chris08876 chris08876 is offline
NYC/NJ/Miami-Dade
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great State of NJ
Posts: 49,407
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture > Completed Project Threads Archive
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:00 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.