HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6501  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 7:00 PM
clayton_rogue clayton_rogue is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 93
Anyone know what project this crane is for?

Looks like 12th and San Antonio area...



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6502  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 8:01 PM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,730
The crane for the Hilton Garden Inn (aka 17th St. Hotel) was once scheduled to go up over last weekend. But a permit also shows a date of a December weekend for that one. So many cranes.
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6503  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 8:13 PM
MichaelB MichaelB is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: North edge of Downtown
Posts: 3,266
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
The crane for the Hilton Garden Inn (aka 17th St. Hotel) was once scheduled to go up over last weekend. But a permit also shows a date of a December weekend for that one. So many cranes.
They have been pouring lots of concrete !
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6504  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 1:05 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,054
Quote:
Originally Posted by The ATX View Post
The crane for the Hilton Garden Inn (aka 17th St. Hotel) was once scheduled to go up over last weekend. But a permit also shows a date of a December weekend for that one. So many cranes.
Those buildings are north of the Moody Bank Tower. This crane is south of it. This is some low rise that's off my radar (and Google Earth map).

EDIT: DING DING DING

It's gotta be this one. 1204 San Antonio Street - Number 18 on the map.

https://downtownaustin.com/economic-...ging-projects/
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.

Last edited by KevinFromTexas; Nov 26, 2019 at 3:33 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6505  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2019, 1:54 AM
427MM's Avatar
427MM 427MM is offline
Love Austin
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by KevinFromTexas View Post
Those buildings are north of the Moody Bank Tower. This crane is south of it. This is some low rise that's off my radar (and Google Earth map).

EDIT: DING DING DING

It's gotta be this one. 1204 San Antonio Street

https://downtownaustin.com/economic-...ging-projects/
Could be off base but I thought it was also on the County Courthouse site.
__________________
How long will Austinites tolerate NIMBY politicians?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6506  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2019, 2:33 AM
AustinGoesVertical AustinGoesVertical is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 554
Taken from 321 W. 6th Thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by We vs us View Post
Wow. I thought it was the vaporware tower on San Jac, in the middle of the CC expansion.

There's really just so much going on right now. I have no idea how to measure a given Austin building surge (I've only been here for 5 years) but it seems like you could reasonably call this one of the "busiest" times (for groundbreakings, for permitting, for proposals, for general activities) in recent years.
I too have been thinking a lot recently about how to dichotomize Austin’s “booms” I remember my mom would travel here in the late 2000s/early 2010s and say Austin’s Downtown was getting new buildings — mostly residential/hotel, that a lot of tech campuses were on “Silicon Hill” but DT was going vertical in residential/hotel categories more than it had so in the past.

I was like 14, with no real conception of Texas, much less Austin, so I always considered Austin more like a little city (at least from a building standpoint). Being from Chicago, I thought of it as like a “small city” and the density/skyline sort of reflected that when I moved there in 2012.

Now, this was after that first wave (Austonian/Monarch/Ashton/W/Four Seasons/Spring), so by 2012 with all of that getting built post-2008 and into 2011 (surprising given the broader real estate crisis in this country at that time), I had felt like I’d missed the “boom”

As I finished high school, seeing projects like The Bowie, Colorado Tower (first new office DT since Frost), and JW Mariott break ground, felt like maybe the residual sputterings of that 2008-2012 boom.

But then things just exploded with Greenwater, Seaholm, and Rainey. It was like never ending — and surely what old me would have considered the rational end of an extended boom cycle.

But I’d grown a little more savvy by then as far as understanding RE markets, demand/absorption etc. and all indications were that despite rising interest rates, Austin was sort of an anomaly because it still had palpable need from a condo/hotel key/and CBD office standpoint given the sheer demand.

Apartments I felt were a little over-built, but then with the growing number of companies setting stakes here or expanding here, even that category looked like it could maintain life (as evidenced by 3rd & Brazos, Hanover, Alexan and Quincy)

Yet it just seems like the dollars and demand are flowing at rates beyond imagination, and with complementary categories to boot.

Single and “married with no kids” professionals who work DT (given the profile of the office tenants/salaries we’re seeing occupy new CBD construction) not only can afford but also choose to occupy these luxury apartments. New condo developments are really catering to “families” now with all the amenities, meaning West Lake, Terrytown folks could easily make the switch and help fuel pre-sales just from Austin alone, to say nothing of higher-level execs and matured professionals relocating with families from the Bay for work. This looping cycle could go on for a long time, as each project complements/drives one another.

As long as quality companies keep moving to the CBD, apartment/hotel demand will remain stable. And as that wealth grows, so will the condo market.

All that said, here’s how I’ve personally classified the “boom” periods:

Period I: 2004-2012 (mainly 2008-12)

Frost Bank Tower
Austin City Lofts
Hilton
360
Four Seasons
The Monarch
Spring
Amli on 2nd
W Hotel
Town Hall
Ashton
Austonian
Federal courthouse

Period II: 2013-2018

Gables Park Plaza*
Whitley
PNC Bank
J.W. Mariott
3rd & Colorado
Westin
Seven
Bowie
Hotel Indigo
Hotel Van Zandt
Aloft Element Hotel
Seaholm
Northshore
5th & Colorado
UT System Headquarters
Google Tower
The Rise
Shoal Creek Walk
The Fairmont
Third + Shoal
SXSW HQ
70 Rainey
5th & West
The Independent
Austin Proper
Homewood Suites
Hotel ZaZa

Period III: 2019-

Marriott*
Block 71 (Indeed)*
5th & Brazos
Block 185 (Google)
Parsley Energy Tower
4th & Colorado
Natiivo Austin
44 East
Alexan Capitol
The Quincy
The Huston
425 Riverside
Hanover Republic Square
6 X Guadalupe

There’s some bleedover, but these periods felt distinct to me at least. Now, what’s astonishing is that 2013-2018 period saw UC/delivery of pretty much all those projects over a six year span, meaning they weren’t exactly all “active” simultaneously.

Right now, we’re talking 14 significant active projects really all just breaking ground within the last 12 months. This has to be the “busiest period” in terms of simultaneous — similar phase — activity. And the pipeline is still growing.

So the reality is that 2008-present has really been non-stop construction but late 2018-present is steroid-level construction, and on the heels of what some felt could be a slowdown just given macro-global economy factors. Not in Austin. Chicago, NYC, Miami, San Fran, and Philly to an extent are also seeing just ridiculous high-rise development btw. But from a concentration, and proportional level, Austin really stands out since similar volume as those cities essentially doubles our existing skyline, and it’s happening over and over and at a lower metro population to support it. Austin may not be the biggest metro even in Texas, but it’s DT is quickly becoming arguably the most dense in the state.

I’d love to see “start date — delivery” timelines visually mapped for all the above projects with a cross-section cutting through to find the point of most simultaneous activity. I’d imagine such a visual data display would pinpoint 2019 as the “peak” and we’re still peaking.

Not to mention, I excluded West Campus, Domain, and broader projects in my “boom” discussion, mainly focusing on the CBD-core, although DT will soon bleed into West Campus if the Pipeline is any indication.

West Campus itself delivered like 8 or so high-rises just during my 4 years at UT. (2014-2018)

Simply, Insane.

Last edited by AustinGoesVertical; Nov 28, 2019 at 3:19 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6507  
Old Posted Nov 28, 2019, 4:45 AM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinGoesVertical View Post
Taken from 321 W. 6th Thread:



I too have been thinking a lot recently about how to dichotomize Austin’s “booms” I remember my mom would travel here in the late 2000s/early 2010s and say Austin’s Downtown was getting new buildings — mostly residential/hotel, that a lot of tech campuses were on “Silicon Hill” but DT was going vertical in residential/hotel categories more than it had so in the past.

I was like 14, with no real conception of Texas, much less Austin, so I always considered Austin more like a little city (at least from a building standpoint). Being from Chicago, I thought of it as like a “small city” and the density/skyline sort of reflected that when I moved there in 2012.

Now, this was after that first wave (Austonian/Monarch/Ashton/W/Four Seasons/Spring), so by 2012 with all of that getting built post-2008 and into 2011 (surprising given the broader real estate crisis in this country at that time), I had felt like I’d missed the “boom”

As I finished high school, seeing projects like The Bowie, Colorado Tower (first new office DT since Frost), and JW Mariott break ground, felt like maybe the residual sputterings of that 2008-2012 boom.

But then things just exploded with Greenwater, Seaholm, and Rainey. It was like never ending — and surely what old me would have considered the rational end of an extended boom cycle.

But I’d grown a little more savvy by then as far as understanding RE markets, demand/absorption etc. and all indications were that despite rising interest rates, Austin was sort of an anomaly because it still had palpable need from a condo/hotel key/and CBD office standpoint given the sheer demand.

Apartments I felt were a little over-built, but then with the growing number of companies setting stakes here or expanding here, even that category looked like it could maintain life (as evidenced by 3rd & Brazos, Hanover, Alexan and Quincy)

Yet it just seems like the dollars and demand are flowing at rates beyond imagination, and with complementary categories to boot.

Single and “married with no kids” professionals who work DT (given the profile of the office tenants/salaries we’re seeing occupy new CBD construction) not only can afford but also choose to occupy these luxury apartments. New condo developments are really catering to “families” now with all the amenities, meaning West Lake, Terrytown folks could easily make the switch and help fuel pre-sales just from Austin alone, to say nothing of higher-level execs and matured professionals relocating with families from the Bay for work. This looping cycle could go on for a long time, as each project complements/drives one another.

As long as quality companies keep moving to the CBD, apartment/hotel demand will remain stable. And as that wealth grows, so will the condo market.

All that said, here’s how I’ve personally classified the “boom” periods:

Period I: 2004-2012 (mainly 2008-12)

Frost Bank Tower
Austin City Lofts
Hilton
360
Four Seasons
The Monarch
Spring
Amli on 2nd
W Hotel
Town Hall
Ashton
Austonian
Federal courthouse

Period II: 2013-2018

Gables Park Plaza*
Whitley
PNC Bank
J.W. Mariott
3rd & Colorado
Westin
Seven
Bowie
Hotel Indigo
Hotel Van Zandt
Aloft Element Hotel
Seaholm
Northshore
5th & Colorado
UT System Headquarters
Google Tower
The Rise
Shoal Creek Walk
The Fairmont
Third + Shoal
SXSW HQ
70 Rainey
5th & West
The Independent
Austin Proper
Homewood Suites
Hotel ZaZa

Period III: 2019-

Marriott*
Block 71 (Indeed)*
5th & Brazos
Block 185 (Google)
Parsley Energy Tower
4th & Colorado
Natiivo Austin
44 East
Alexan Capitol
The Quincy
The Huston
425 Riverside
Hanover Republic Square
6 X Guadalupe

There’s some bleedover, but these periods felt distinct to me at least. Now, what’s astonishing is that 2013-2018 period saw UC/delivery of pretty much all those projects over a six year span, meaning they weren’t exactly all “active” simultaneously.

Right now, we’re talking 14 significant active projects really all just breaking ground within the last 12 months. This has to be the “busiest period” in terms of simultaneous — similar phase — activity. And the pipeline is still growing.

So the reality is that 2008-present has really been non-stop construction but late 2018-present is steroid-level construction, and on the heels of what some felt could be a slowdown just given macro-global economy factors. Not in Austin. Chicago, NYC, Miami, San Fran, and Philly to an extent are also seeing just ridiculous high-rise development btw. But from a concentration, and proportional level, Austin really stands out since similar volume as those cities essentially doubles our existing skyline, and it’s happening over and over and at a lower metro population to support it. Austin may not be the biggest metro even in Texas, but it’s DT is quickly becoming arguably the most dense in the state.

I’d love to see “start date — delivery” timelines visually mapped for all the above projects with a cross-section cutting through to find the point of most simultaneous activity. I’d imagine such a visual data display would pinpoint 2019 as the “peak” and we’re still peaking.

Not to mention, I excluded West Campus, Domain, and broader projects in my “boom” discussion, mainly focusing on the CBD-core, although DT will soon bleed into West Campus if the Pipeline is any indication.

West Campus itself delivered like 8 or so high-rises just during my 4 years at UT. (2014-2018)

Simply, Insane.
Good post. I'll fill you in on the first boom you missed...1984 - 1987.
Note, most of these buildings lack any significant architectural extravagance or height due to the CoA placing a plethora of restrictions on the developers. They wanted the Capitol Building to stand out and remain the tallest building downtown. But the 80s boom was significant because it gave Austin somewhat of a skyline it didn't really have, save for the BoA and Chase buildings. Most of the new buildings stretched in a straight line from the river to just north of the Capitol Building. Also, aside from the Omni Hotel, all these buildings were office, no apartments or condos, so they did nothing to improve the nightlife downtown after 6PM. Aside from 6th St, Austin went to sleep when the work day was done.

>San Jacinto Center
>One American Center
>One Congress
>100 Congress
>301 Congress
>Capitol Tower (voted worst building in downtown Austin for the past 33 years, by me)
>816 Congress (which later got a much needed facelift)
>William P. Clements State Office Building (a good example of the stubbiness of the new boom buildings)
>Austin Centre and Omni Hotel (office and hotel combo)
>Capitol Center

In addition, the 80s saw the renovation of the Capitol Building and the changing of the Goddess of Liberty. I watched from a few blocks away while a Chinook helicopter lifted her off the pole she was inserted on. Don't go there guys...
There seemed to be cranes everywhere as all these and more were being constructed during a short period. And like you said about today, it seemed insane back then too. Someone coined the phrase of the crane being Austin's official bird, or something like that.
So, the 80s saw the first significant building boom, things sputtered a bit in the 90s but still gave us a small wave of construction and broken proposals, and your lists covers the rest.

Last edited by the Genral; Nov 28, 2019 at 5:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6508  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2019, 3:02 AM
AustinGoesVertical AustinGoesVertical is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 554
Thanks Genral for broadening the scope of my post. I was always curious what people considered Austin’s first real high-rise boom, so your explanation of the 1980s was helpful to read. As you alluded to, it seems like there was a lull between then and the early 2000s as far as serious projects are concerned. Frost Bank, Hilton Condos, and Austin City Lofts come to mind as the sparks of the modern-skyline. I personally think Hilton looks much better since it’s exterior update — similar to The Line Hotel, which I *think* was built in a similar period? I remember my professor Larry Speck explained that Austin City Lofts was pretty groundbreaking as far as starting the trend of people wanting to actually live downtown. Amli Downtown, Amli on 2nd, 360, and Monarch were sort of the next phases of that.

After Colorado Tower and JW, office and hotel projects really surged, solidifying new construction delivery as mixed use in scope. So I look at 2013 as the turning point of development broadening from mostly residential to all sorts of verticals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6509  
Old Posted Nov 30, 2019, 3:55 AM
The ATX's Avatar
The ATX The ATX is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Right here, right now
Posts: 12,730
2020 may be the most skyline changing year ever for Austin. But there are somethings that could still happen in what's left of 2019:

The official start of The Avenue Hyatt Centric Hotel
The groundbreaking of the Hanover tower (January is more likely)
Installation of the crane for the 17th & Lavaca Hiton Garden Inn
Demo of the Taco Cabana for the long suffering 211 S. Lamar PUD
A couple of the more significant W/C projects could breakground as well
__________________
Follow The ATX on X:
https://x.com/TheATX1

Things will be great when you're downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6510  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2019, 12:35 AM
Dariusb Dariusb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Belton, TX
Posts: 1,183
I'm not an Austin resident or even from there but it's awesome witnessing see a city blossom before our very eyes and in such a short period of time at that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6511  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2019, 7:25 AM
OU812 OU812 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 310
Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinGoesVertical View Post
Taken from 321 W. 6th Thread:
Austin may not be the biggest metro even in Texas, but it’s DT is quickly becoming arguably the most dense in the state.
Perfect time to start a downtown monorail....or better yet....monorail using MAGLEV. Probably won't ever happen though.
In my opinion, elevated rail downtown is THE best option as the footprint would be quite minimal in terms of impeding on traffic.
A subway wouldn't be feasible as we all know those are not cost effective in Texas. Plus don't monorails "look" so much cooler!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6512  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2019, 8:16 AM
Jdawgboy's Avatar
Jdawgboy Jdawgboy is offline
Representing the ATX!!!
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by OU812 View Post
Perfect time to start a downtown monorail....or better yet....monorail using MAGLEV. Probably won't ever happen though.
In my opinion, elevated rail downtown is THE best option as the footprint would be quite minimal in terms of impeding on traffic.
A subway wouldn't be feasible as we all know those are not cost effective in Texas. Plus don't monorails "look" so much cooler!!
Check out the Chiba Japan Monorail, would love to see something similar here.
__________________
"GOOD TIMES!!!" Jerri Blank (Strangers With Candy)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6513  
Old Posted Dec 1, 2019, 11:43 PM
427MM's Avatar
427MM 427MM is offline
Love Austin
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,243
Lots of talk about going BIG on transit in Nov. of 2020. Really no reason in the world not to. We'll likely have around 75% voter turnout which bodes well for it. My hope is something in the $5-10 billion range. Some will push for weak packages such as bus only but that would squander a wonderful opportunity to go big on premium service. Let's hope City Council is bold on transit. We're so far behind...
__________________
How long will Austinites tolerate NIMBY politicians?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6514  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2019, 2:23 AM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by 427MM View Post
Lots of talk about going BIG on transit in Nov. of 2020. Really no reason in the world not to. We'll likely have around 75% voter turnout which bodes well for it. My hope is something in the $5-10 billion range. Some will push for weak packages such as bus only but that would squander a wonderful opportunity to go big on premium service. Let's hope City Council is bold on transit. We're so far behind...
The higher the voter turn out, the greater the chance that many of those voters came to Austin from cities with superior transit. I'm sure they would vote for emulating what they are used to. In this case, it may be a good thing we are getting so many newcomers especially if they can help change the mindset of practicality. It might make up for the cultural shift that also comes with the invasion of outsiders. Wouldn't it be ironic if the people who compounded the transit woes eventually help fix it. Without them, I doubt there are enough last standing Austinites who would vote BIG in the range you speak of. Not while there are other issues like homelessness and blue algae growing on Lady Bird Lake. And since the majority of Austinites don't live near or in downtown, they probably don't give a rat's anal orifice about transit anyway since it won't help alleviate the congestion in the burbs. Monorail...if its just for the downtown area, I don't see a good return on the investment unless it not only winds around the city core, but also extends from deep south Austin to the Domain-ish area. I personally would park in any one of the thousand parking garages at the Domain to catch a ride on one destined for downtown.

Last edited by the Genral; Dec 2, 2019 at 2:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6515  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2019, 6:51 PM
Sigaven Sigaven is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by OU812 View Post
Perfect time to start a downtown monorail....or better yet....monorail using MAGLEV. Probably won't ever happen though.
In my opinion, elevated rail downtown is THE best option as the footprint would be quite minimal in terms of impeding on traffic.
A subway wouldn't be feasible as we all know those are not cost effective in Texas. Plus don't monorails "look" so much cooler!!
Isn't Cap Metro floating the idea of doing a subway downtown? Thought i read that in the transportation thread.

Elevated would be great but I'm not sure how they would address crossing Congress Avenue. That would technically be blocking a capitol view corridor (and arguably the most important one).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6516  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2019, 7:04 PM
Novacek Novacek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sigaven View Post
Isn't Cap Metro floating the idea of doing a subway downtown? Thought i read that in the transportation thread.

Elevated would be great but I'm not sure how they would address crossing Congress Avenue. That would technically be blocking a capitol view corridor (and arguably the most important one).
To be pedantic about it (transit discussions bring that out) what CM is potentially proposing would be a light rail and/or bus tunnel(s).

It wouldn't be a "subway" in the traditional US sense because it wouldn't be heavy rail (still light at most). The vehicles would be light rail width and would be 2 or at most 3 car sets.

It's a difference in a significantly smaller passenger/hour capacity (because, as noted, we're not going to be needing heavy rail capacities any time soon).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6517  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2019, 11:00 PM
urbancore urbancore is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Zilker
Posts: 1,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by 427MM View Post
Lots of talk about going BIG on transit in Nov. of 2020. Really no reason in the world not to. We'll likely have around 75% voter turnout which bodes well for it. My hope is something in the $5-10 billion range. Some will push for weak packages such as bus only but that would squander a wonderful opportunity to go big on premium service. Let's hope City Council is bold on transit. We're so far behind...
the question is how much will $5-10b increase property taxes? The 2014 bond would increase my monthly tax bill nearly $50 if memory serves and that was less than $1.5b. Unless they find a way to keep the taxes low, I don't see it happening. Too much for too few.

I agree that the wild card is the expected huge turnout for 2020, but I think that the homeowners will still turn out FAR more than the renters.

I'm also not convinced the young people will ever turn out for any elections. They never have.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6518  
Old Posted Dec 2, 2019, 11:40 PM
We vs us We vs us is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,601
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbancore View Post

I'm also not convinced the young people will ever turn out for any elections. They never have.
2018 midterms were a big improvement amongst the 18-29 yr old set, to be fair. Still low, relatively speaking, but a 78% increase YOY. Up from 20% to 36%.

https://www.census.gov/library/stori...n-turnout.html

Not to get too far off into the weeds, but I think the "youth" vote, such as it is, is one of the wildcards for the 2020 election; I'd say there're even odds engagement improves even further, or falls back to historical levels. TBH, I like where the city's put its chips . . . my personal belief is that 2020 is going to be through the roof.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6519  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2019, 12:25 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,054
So, there's a chance that Pinnacle Campus could be torn down as they're saying it might not be financially feasible to retrofit it for 2020 market standards.

https://www.statesman.com/news/20191...innacle-campus
Quote:
"It's a high-rise building in a low-rise environment with substantial functional obsolescence," he said. "The cost to renovate the building, to bring it up to 2020 market standards, might exceed the cost of the current value of the building."

The best use of the land, Heimsath added, could be to tear down the building and construct something new, although that option has not been discussed publicly by ACC leaders.
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6520  
Old Posted Dec 3, 2019, 2:35 PM
Echostatic's Avatar
Echostatic Echostatic is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,430
Would be a shame. That building isn't exactly pretty, but it's pretty much the only tall building for miles and miles in Southwest Austin. They could at least redevelop the massive surface parking lot surrounding the tower.
__________________
It can be done, if we have the will.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:36 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.