Quote:
Originally Posted by joshlemer
Maybe some parts of Winnipeg's bike lanes are very piecemeal, but this recent drama headed up by Obby seems to be mainly about Bannatyne and McDermot which both have dedicated bike lanes all the way from Waterfront until HSC (on McDermot, even past HSC), so doesn't seem very piecemeal to me. I guess you could have a point about the one-block bike lane on Arthur though.
|
The McDermott route is great if you’re traveling from HSC to Main, but it’s not part of a planned network that extends across town. For example, there is no logical route for cyclists to commute from St James to Downtown. But there are a few bits here and there, but no safe or logical connection. That’s why it’s piecemeal.
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshlemer
I think that on the bigger picture though, urbanists should not choose bike lanes in the exchange district as their hill to die on. There are just way bigger fish to fry. It's already pretty safe and comfortable for cyclists to bike through the exchange -- traffic is already slow and there are lights every block. More important would be getting dedicated bike lanes in more extremely hostile, car-dominant sections of the city (Kennaston, Portage, Main, the gaps in coverage on Pembina).
|
Lol. Pretty safe? Have you tried riding in the Exchange outside of the bike lanes? I would disagree.
I would agree that the city has to also develop safe bike lanes on major routes, but I have been told by my city counsellor that there is no plan to develop bike lanes ever on portage ave. They want cyclists diverted to other streets like St Mathews or Wolseley. This shows a complete lack of understanding of what cyclists actually want. Many regular cyclists want to travel quickly and efficiently from the suburbs downtown just like other commuters. Instead, the city thinks we want meandering leisurely paths along the river or on secondary roads.