HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #15801  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2019, 3:39 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phxguy View Post
Had no idea there would a phase 2 to the Lincoln Union. Did a quick search and found this site with some renderings of what you mentioned. The apartments aren’t 6-stories though.

https://www.crexi.com/lease/properties/119181/arizona-lincoln-union-phase-ii
Is that a complete rehab of an existing warehouse?
__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
     
     
  #15802  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2019, 4:00 PM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieFoos View Post
Is that a complete rehab of an existing warehouse?
Phase 1 was the only existing warehouse on that massive parking lot. I think all this is brand new.

If apartments go on the lot, it would have to be north of the new parking garage.

     
     
  #15803  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2019, 7:33 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by ASU Diablo View Post
Phase 1 was the only existing warehouse on that massive parking lot. I think all this is brand new.

If apartments go on the lot, it would have to be north of the new parking garage.

Yeah phase 2 is brand new but designed to look warehouse like
     
     
  #15804  
Old Posted Nov 19, 2019, 8:43 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,513
It looks good. Nice development!
__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
     
     
  #15805  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2019, 3:47 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
Interesting article about Maricopa County court system, As it states they have been very active in building projects downtown, and in my opinion decent ones.

But it looks like this old office building is getting a remodel, hopefully its brown windowless twin a block to the east will be next. I couldnt find any renderings for it. if anyone can please link them.

https://goo.gl/maps/mhBLUqkqQeFjyb318

Quote:

Maricopa County Facilities Management continues to build facilities that serve the community with plans for upcoming capital projects at two animal care and control facilities and the Southeast Consolidated Justice Center and Adult Probation Facility.

According to the annual Capital Improvement Program research recently completed by BEX staff, Maricopa County remains steady as the fifth largest public agency in the state with regards to capital spending. The current CIP pegs the 5-year spend by the agency at $1.418B. This appears to be a consistent allocation as it is nearly unchanged over the last three years.

The County has built some of the largest vertical public building projects in the state looking back over the last ten years. These include:

$259M+ Maricopa County Court Tower in Downtown Phoenix completed in 2011 built by Gilbane Building Co. and Ryan Companies and designed by Gould Evans + DMJM.
$181M Intake Transfer & Release Facility currently under construction by Hensel Phelps and designed by Arrington Watkins Architects. This project is scheduled to be complete Q4 2019.
$65M Madison Street Jail Adaptive Reuse project also currently under construction, being built by Layton Construction and designed by DLR Group.
The County has several projects that have not yet secured the full scope of construction services.

Administration Building Restack

In the Summer of 2019, Layton Construction secured a contract for pre-construction services for the $35M-$40M project to renovate the existing Maricopa County building located at 301 W. Jefferson Street in downtown Phoenix. Dekker Perich Sabatini is the Architect of Record. The project is scheduled to break ground in April 2020 and take approximately 18 months to build.


Maricopa County Animal Safe Haven Facility (MASH)

Currently requesting proposals for CMAR services, the County is looking to develop a new $7M facility on their Durango Campus that will provide space for animals under the care of the County. This contract is a one-step CMAR procurement, with the written proposal being the only criteria for selection. Due on 12-12-19, there is a non-mandatory pre-proposal meeting on 11-25-19. Line + Space is the Architect of Record for this project.

East Valley Animal Care and Control Facility

During the design process for the Animal Safe Haven Facility (MASH), it was concluded that the Durango Campus does not have enough space to consolidate the existing Animal Care Facility currently located at Rio Salado Parkway and the Loop 101 in Mesa. Line + Space is continuing on as the Architect of Record to design a new 52KSF facility to be located at the Maricopa County Service Complex, located at Baseline Road and Mesa Road in Mesa.

This new facility will include kennel buildings, a veterinary clinic, outdoor play yards and administrative spaces. Maricopa County anticipates soliciting bids on the 3rd or 4th week of December 2019 and estimates construction to be $15M-$20M.

This contract opportunity is anticipated to be a low-bid procurement.

Maricopa County Southeast Consolidated Justice Facility

Maricopa County is currently working on the design for a new facility that will house four Maricopa County Justice Courts as well as Maricopa County Adult Probation. This facility will be located at the Maricopa County Service Complex located near Baseline Road and Mesa Drive.

This new two-story facility will be approximately 109KSF and will be attached to the current Southeast Superior Court Facility located at Javelina Avenue and Chucri Street. Maricopa County anticipates soliciting bids for this project in April/May 2020 and estimates construction to be $30M-$35M.

Gould Evans is the design firm of record on this project. This project is also anticipated to be a design-bid-build procurement.

How to Work with Maricopa County

Interested bidders can follow the status of these solicitations at https://www.maricopa.gov/2190/Solicitations and should submit their bids to the Maricopa County Office of Procurement Services via Bid Sync.

More details on responding to bids via Bid Sync can be found at
     
     
  #15806  
Old Posted Nov 20, 2019, 4:16 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
BEX has some good articles today:http://azbex.com/busy-times-where-to-start/

I would say look at the bottom portion for some insight into our lack of spec offices.

Quote:
As a reporter and an analyst, you are always on the lookout for things like riots, fires and mudslides because they’re riveting to report and write about.

As someone who actually cares about the areas you cover, you want things to be slow, incremental and even placid.

Q3 gave a fair amount of both and, unusually, did it in all the markets we cover. Following is a quick look at many of the happenings we’ve been following.

National Rents

In major markets across the U.S., rent growth has slowed or retreated slightly. While we tend to make a point of trying to ignore analysts who look at nine weeks of data and pretend that’s a broad enough set to predict a trend, it does merit discussion.

While certainly not saturating, Class A vacancies have begun to inch up over the last two years in major markets like New York, LA, Washington (D.C.) and Seattle. An interesting quote in the “Emerging Trends in Real Estate® 2020” report noted, “It has largely to do with the finite limits of that more price-elastic group that can tolerate pass-along costs in their monthly rents, versus a far-larger and much faster-growing universe of people whose household incomes set lower rent tolerance levels.”

More people are moving out of their parents’ basements and moving into their own place, but even people who can afford it are looking at other-than-top-tier properties. As we have noted here repeatedly, that’s putting more pressure on availability in Class B and even Class C properties.

In still hot markets like Arizona in general and Phoenix in particular, that’s going to have continuing impacts on affordability and continue fueling the drive toward value-add renovations, particularly in the face of labor shortages and land costs in highly desirable submarkets, compared to completing and pressing new unit deliveries into the markets.

What’s Up with California?

California is exceptionally fortunate that it has an economy larger than most developed nations to absorb the scope and breadth of its policy practices, even though it’s anyone’s guess how long that will remain the case if it continues its business-hostile ways from the past three-plus decades.

Most recently, the state has passed and scheduled a rent control process that has investors worried about what to do next. Short version: Rent growth is capped at five percent per year for properties older than 15 years. That’s likely going to gut the renovation and value-add market.

Combined with a slew of 18 new laws intended to create tax exemptions during construction, ease permitting, simplify zoning and remove other barriers to creating new and affordable housing, rent control could, potentially, fuel new development, particularly given the rent control statute’s exemption for properties newer than 15 years.

However, no amount of legislation is going to overcome the three harshest realities slowing development in California and around the country: 30 years of shunning trade skill training across the U.S. has created a horrifying lack of workers to execute projects; land prices are continuing to increase, and everything from concrete to rebar to drywall to nails is getting more expensive.

On the California upside, however, a 9/27 GlobeSt discussion with David Harrington of Matthews Real Estate Investment Services noted an interesting possibility as a result of the new state regulation: California properties, even those that haven’t traditionally raised rents on a year-over-year basis, could now start implementing 5 percent bumps every year like clockwork. For properties with secure and stable debt, that’s not the worst potential ROI outcome.

Oregon and New York also passed rent control measures this year, and many experts are concerned this could be the beginning of a national trend that could hamper the industry across the board.

The field of Democratic Party 2020 presidential candidates is still huge, and candidates are reaching far and wide to issue proposals that will get them noticed. Toward that end, a couple of the more prominent aspirants have floated the trial balloon of federal level rent control. Details have been scant, but the idea could be appealing to younger voters starting their careers and having trouble affording the $1,189 national average for a two-bedroom.

Industry opinions on the idea have ranged from denial and dismissal to amusement to abject terror.

Phoenix Market Metrics: By the Numbers

While rent growth is slowing nationwide, Phoenix has remained largely immune, and as a result the transaction appetite is still heavy.

For 10-99-unit properties, Q3 saw a transaction volume of more than $197M, which represented a 0.7 percent Year-over-Year decrease from Q3 2018. In the 100+ unit category, Q3 brought in $1.93B, up 12.5 percent over 2018.

Average Price-Per-Unit amounts were up in the 10-99 segment, rising 21.3 percent Y-o-Y to $119,664, and up 19.9 percent to $174,583 for 100+. These translated to an Average Price/SF of $154.04 in 10-99 (up 17.7 percent) and $205.13 (up 20.9 percent) in 100+.

Inventory age remained relatively consistent Year-over-Year, with Average Year Built for 10-99 being 1971, versus 1970 for the same quarter last year. Average Year Built in 100+ was 1994, compared to 1991 in 2018.

The market’s occupancy rate remained high. Q3 occupancy for 10+ units was 95.3 percent, an increase of 0.1 percent Y-o-Y. Average rent was $1,176 up 7.2 percent ($79) from Q3 2018.

Phoenix MSA demographics continued their solid trends. The Census estimate of total population was 4,737,270. The unemployment rate finished the quarter at 3.8 percent, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers.

Median Household Income was $57,935, and Per Capita Income came in at $29,542.

In the realm of new construction for 50+ unit properties, only 1,895 units were delivered across 10 projects, bringing the year-to-date count to 6,781 units at 30 properties, and making the odds of exceeding our start of the year projection of 8,500 deliveries appear highly unlikely.

An estimated 22,738 units are in the Planning stages across 99 properties. A total of 14,728 units were listed as Under Construction in 57 properties.

Pre-lease absorption rates are still high across the region at a rate of 15 units/property/month.

Total Unit Inventory for 10+ properties was 331,307, and 50+ came in at 307,928.

Across the MSA, 50+ unit inventories by city were:

Phoenix: 137,415
Mesa: 37,774
Tempe: 34,235
Scottsdale: 27,583
Glendale: 24,492
What’s in Store for Arizona?

Most experts at a recent conference in Los Angeles said they aren’t particularly worried about California’s five percent cap. However, if that turns out to be the beginning of the more sweeping changes some experts anticipate, and they have the effect of driving down transaction volume, it will likely turn up the heat for investment in Arizona as more investors look for new outlets.

In addition to sitting at or near the top for demographic appeal, owners and developers looking to invest in Arizona are also benefitting from the current environment of falling interest rates. Coupled with a relative abundance of capital, the area’s investment and development boom should continue and likely accelerate even as cap rates continue to compress.

While Arizona enjoys a favorable climate in terms of both weather and opportunity, and despite an attractively balanced mix of eager investors across the private, institutional and foreign sectors, accessing that abundance of capital continues to be a challenge for new development.

At Bisnow’s Phoenix State of the Market event in September, several panelists lamented what they called, “An East Coast stranglehold,” on development capital. They explained an ongoing challenge in getting projects funded, particularly in office but also in multifamily, is that major lenders rely on national actuarial formulations and don’t fully take into account the currently exceptional deviations from the norm Arizona brings to the table.

“If rent growth slows from 3 percent down to, say, 1.5 percent nationally, that’s all the money guys are going to look at,” said one panel member. “It’s frustrating when we’re seeing rent growth at 7 percent and occupancy over 95 percent. Come on, guys, we’re filling every unit we build, and we can fill a lot more if you just look at us realistically and realize we’re in a perfect environment to build and absorb more and faster than nearly anywhere else.”
     
     
  #15807  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 12:48 AM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 950
Sam Fox, developer lower proposed height of new Phoenix hotel, office project

     
     
  #15808  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 3:05 PM
NativePHX NativePHX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 15
I attended a meeting yesterday held by the developer (Mortensen) for the planned Hyatt Place on the corner of Adams and 2nd Avenue. They showed site plans and renderings of the building.

While I am all for removing surface lots and adding density to the core, the design of this building is uninspiring - and frankly ugly. It was a major disappointment as this building will sit between both, the Title and Trust Building (Orpheum Lofts) and the Orpheum Theatre. These are two of the most historic and vistually interesting buildings in the downtown core and now they are to be separated by an ugly, low-class, hotel.

I'm remiss for not taking photos, but will try to provide some in the meantime.

https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news...ed-for-downtown-phoenix-parking-lot.html
     
     
  #15809  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 3:23 PM
PHX31's Avatar
PHX31 PHX31 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: PHX
Posts: 7,206
I noticed this morning that this strip of historic store fronts had fencing around it as well as a couple dumpsters.

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4514831,...1kh01-_i2RzngHcQ!2e0!3e11!7i16384!8i8192

Does anyone know what is going on? It would be amazing if these would be rehabbed back to life just like the Welnick Market and The Van Buren just up the street.

Add in X and the other residences just north of these and this could be a major turning point for west VB.
     
     
  #15810  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 4:00 PM
CrestedSaguaro's Avatar
CrestedSaguaro CrestedSaguaro is offline
Modulator
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 4,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by NativePHX View Post
I attended a meeting yesterday held by the developer (Mortensen) for the planned Hyatt Place on the corner of Adams and 2nd Avenue. They showed site plans and renderings of the building.

While I am all for removing surface lots and adding density to the core, the design of this building is uninspiring - and frankly ugly. It was a major disappointment as this building will sit between both, the Title and Trust Building (Orpheum Lofts) and the Orpheum Theatre. These are two of the most historic and vistually interesting buildings in the downtown core and now they are to be separated by an ugly, low-class, hotel.

I'm remiss for not taking photos, but will try to provide some in the meantime.

https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news...ed-for-downtown-phoenix-parking-lot.html
I already argued against this hotel and it seemed a few were more for desperation to develop the lot than to put something better there. Downtown Phoenix is beyond this type of development and I hope Phoenix Council sends it back to the drawing boards.
__________________
Ronnie Garrett
https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?memberID=205
     
     
  #15811  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 4:03 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by PHX31 View Post
I noticed this morning that this strip of historic store fronts had fencing around it as well as a couple dumpsters.

https://www.google.com/maps/@33.4514831,...1kh01-_i2RzngHcQ!2e0!3e11!7i16384!8i8192

Does anyone know what is going on? It would be amazing if these would be rehabbed back to life just like the Welnick Market and The Van Buren just up the street.

Add in X and the other residences just north of these and this could be a major turning point for west VB.
The west part of downtown, down to the capitol, Garfield and Grand ave are all going to be hot areas of development for the next building cycle

Also the warehouse district/along south central down the light rail line.
     
     
  #15812  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 4:34 PM
NativePHX NativePHX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by RonnieFoos View Post
I already argued against this hotel and it seemed a few were more for desperation to develop the lot than to put something better there. Downtown Phoenix is beyond this type of development and I hope Phoenix Council sends it back to the drawing boards.
I agree. When I saw the renderings it occurred to me that this was simply landbanking - throwing a tear-down hotel on top of a lot that will appreciate.

Who can we contact to persuade the Council to push for a more harmonious design with the beautiful/classic buildings that surround it.
     
     
  #15813  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 4:49 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by NativePHX View Post
I agree. When I saw the renderings it occurred to me that this was simply landbanking - throwing a tear-down hotel on top of a lot that will appreciate.

Who can we contact to persuade the Council to push for a more harmonious design with the beautiful/classic buildings that surround it.
Yeah I dont really mind it being short or even not that pretty but I wish it was a better hotel in that location. Something a little more Up-brand than a Hampton Inn,

Put the Hampton in over by 7th street where it belongs
     
     
  #15814  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 4:52 PM
azsunsurfer azsunsurfer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,473
How much did Sam Fox cave? How tall are the buildings going to be now?
     
     
  #15815  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 4:57 PM
NativePHX NativePHX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno View Post
Yeah I dont really mind it being short or even not that pretty but I wish it was a better hotel in that location. Something a little more Up-brand than a Hampton Inn,

Put the Hampton in over by 7th street where it belongs
This hotel is the Hyatt Place - which is apparently the lowest class Hyatt. Funny you mention the Hampton Inn though because it was built by the same developer (the Hampton Inn on 1st St. and Polk) and it also lacks any semblance of architectural significance.
     
     
  #15816  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 5:04 PM
exit2lef exit2lef is offline
reasonably smart guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,340
Quote:
Originally Posted by NativePHX View Post
This hotel is the Hyatt Place - which is apparently the lowest class Hyatt. Funny you mention the Hampton Inn though because it was built by the same developer (the Hampton Inn on 1st St. and Polk) and it also lacks any semblance of architectural significance.
Those brands seldom have any architectural significance unless the property is a reuse of an existing building. The Hilton Garden Inn’s adaptation of a former bank tower is a welcome exception to the rule, but the newly built Hampton Inn is more typical.
     
     
  #15817  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 5:13 PM
NativePHX NativePHX is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
Those brands seldom have any architectural significance unless the property is a reuse of an existing building. The Hilton Garden Inn’s adaptation of a former bank tower is a welcome exception to the rule, but the newly built Hampton Inn is more typical.
Agreed. Let me rephrase that. I'd appreciate a building that adds to the overall the ambience of the surrounding streetscape. This building wouldn't add to, it would detract from.
     
     
  #15818  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 5:15 PM
azliam azliam is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by NativePHX View Post
I agree. When I saw the renderings it occurred to me that this was simply landbanking - throwing a tear-down hotel on top of a lot that will appreciate.

Who can we contact to persuade the Council to push for a more harmonious design with the beautiful/classic buildings that surround it.
I totally agree.

On a separate note, I also wanted to mention that I had never even heard of the Duppa Homestead located at 115 W. Sherman St. in Phoenix. Likely the oldest house in Phoenix that sits somewhat in disrepair. I'd like to see more done with buildings like this. It's not like Phoenix has a lot of history as it is. It's on the Phoenix historic property register, but doesn't appear to be a priority. Has anyone visited the building?
     
     
  #15819  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 5:29 PM
xymox xymox is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 1,178
Quote:
Originally Posted by azsunsurfer View Post
How much did Sam Fox cave? How tall are the buildings going to be now?
59 ft.

So yeah, dropped what - one floor? (originally 75ft I believe)
__________________
mmmm skyscraper, I love you....
     
     
  #15820  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2019, 10:57 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,460
Sorry if this has been discussed, but I didn't see it. New pre-app for 23 stories on McKinley, "McKinley Green." Doesn't list address. Fact finding and fire report documents from this summer that come up when searching around for the project list the address variously as 801 N 2nd Ave (NEC McKinley/2nd Ave) and 800 N 1st Ave (NWC McKinley/1st Ave). Not sure if one or other other is wrong; if they intend to span the block and abandon the alley; or if both are wrong. Same owner for the parcels on either side of the alley so it could be that they're wanting a thicc one.

EDIT: and looks like this is a True North project?


     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:25 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.