HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 7:11 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by cairnstone View Post
I sure hope this dies before anyone buys into it. This sounds like the exact same brochure that was sold to New York, Chicago, Detroit etc. Now we call them Projects.
Density is great but everything has to be in balance. We are moving so far out of balance in this city. So where would the school go? Also last FN lands are not part of the Metro District so who is going to deal with the all the services they offer. Basically they are creating a city in a city that will be privately controlled
You don't think they'd integrate with Metro Vancouver, and be taxed accordingly for water/sewer/etc?

I suppose you don't think they'll get service from Fortis or BC Hydro either?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 7:12 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,660
^^ Yeah someone trying to compare them to projects... needed a good laugh this morning.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 7:13 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 14,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
You don't think they'd integrate with Metro Vancouver, and be taxed accordingly for water/sewer/etc?

I suppose you don't think they'll get service from Fortis or BC Hydro either?

From the article:

Quote:
The team still has to negotiate with the city over water, sewer and waste-removal services, but the general idea is that the Squamish will collect taxes on all of the units, including the half owned by Westbank, and pay for services with that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 7:14 PM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laramidia
Posts: 12,752
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
I am currently heating the popcorn!
Haha me too.
__________________
Peak SSP:

28C is hotter than 42C
Vancouver is not on the ocean but Quebec City is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 7:41 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
You don't think they'd integrate with Metro Vancouver, and be taxed accordingly for water/sewer/etc?

I suppose you don't think they'll get service from Fortis or BC Hydro either?
And policing? Fire?

There's a whole slew of reasons why it's hard to imagine any buyer choosing this over Oakridge, Trolley Depot lands. Rental is a different story.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 7:50 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,026
History repeats itself and in the past they have not connected but have built separate infrastructure. The project beside the ferry in Tsawwassen put its own system in. Was in court for years against Delta and gvrd. I also believe the mall is on its own system
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 7:58 PM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laramidia
Posts: 12,752
Is it too early to share this to the Canadian Proposals thread?
__________________
Peak SSP:

28C is hotter than 42C
Vancouver is not on the ocean but Quebec City is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 8:51 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
And policing? Fire?

There's a whole slew of reasons why it's hard to imagine any buyer choosing this over Oakridge, Trolley Depot lands. Rental is a different story.
Because Waterfront.

You think this is being done like a reserve in northern BC 50 years ago? Come on people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 8:55 PM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laramidia
Posts: 12,752
Ya downtown location and all the water views and the mountains are closer.
__________________
Peak SSP:

28C is hotter than 42C
Vancouver is not on the ocean but Quebec City is.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 9:33 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,026
Would love to see who will be the financial partner that will be putting 1.5 plus billion dollars on the table and not owning any of the property.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 9:40 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by cairnstone View Post
Would love to see who will be the financial partner that will be putting 1.5 plus billion dollars on the table and not owning any of the property.
It's in the article. Westbank is taking 50% of profits and financing construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 9:45 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Because Waterfront.

You think this is being done like a reserve in northern BC 50 years ago? Come on people.
Less and less of a selling point these days:

Climate change experts agree on the last place they'd invest for the future: waterfront property

I just can't see the value proposition in buying a high-end condo on leased land vs other new mega-developments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 9:46 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
You don't think they'd integrate with Metro Vancouver, and be taxed accordingly for water/sewer/etc?

I suppose you don't think they'll get service from Fortis or BC Hydro either?
Sure they could or they could be like the 2 North Vancouver's, 2 Langley's. Or white Rock and Surrey. They have some shared and some separate resources. The more the city gives the more control they will impose on this project.

It will be interesting to see what this turns into and what the price point will be per square foot when its rented.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 9:53 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
It's in the article. Westbank is taking 50% of profits and financing construction.
Developers use other peoples money to build. So they will be creating a LLP with them being the front for the partners. SO who is the money behind the project?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 9:55 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Less and less of a selling point these days:

Climate change experts agree on the last place they'd invest for the future: waterfront property

I just can't see the value proposition in buying a high-end condo on leased land vs other new mega-developments.
Just ask investors in Jakarta market how that is turning out
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 10:25 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by cairnstone View Post
Developers use other peoples money to build. So they will be creating a LLP with them being the front for the partners. SO who is the money behind the project?
A bank? Why is this different than any other large development?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 10:25 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
Less and less of a selling point these days:

Climate change experts agree on the last place they'd invest for the future: waterfront property

I just can't see the value proposition in buying a high-end condo on leased land vs other new mega-developments.
Downtown Vancouver area is pretty safe. Seawalls will be heightened if necessary. I'd worry a lot more about Richmond.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 10:31 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,438
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 10:44 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Some highlights from the article:

Quote:
As Senakw, the name of the project, sits within the reserve’s boundaries, the First Nation is able to fully exercise its rights and construct a redevelopment without having to follow the City of Vancouver’s zoning and years-long application and review process. It aligns with the city’s much-touted policy of reconciliation.

But they will still need to negotiate with the municipal government and regional district for road and utilities connections.

If all goes as planned, master planning and detailed design work will continue throughout 2020, and construction could begin in early 2021 for a full completion within just five years.
Quote:
Some commercial spaces are also planned on the ground level, although the precise mix of retail, restaurants, and other forms of commercial development, potentially some offices, have yet to be determined.
Quote:
Khelsilem says the First Nation is looking to start a conversation with the municipal government to extend the route of the future Arbutus Greenway streetcar towards Senakw.

The city’s master plan for the streetcar currently does not call for a span that serves the area, and city staff last year recommended disposing of the former railway right-of-way, selling it back to Canadian Pacific Railway for $1.00. But the planned density, coupled with Concord Pacific’s long-term plan of redeveloping their old Molson Coors brewery property, located immediately south of Senakw, could warrant a streetcar connection.
Source: https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/squa...nakw-kitsilano


I do hope the final plan for ground-level commercial uses will be substantial and make a meaningful contribution to ubanity in the currently sleepy area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 11:00 PM
cairnstone cairnstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,026
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
A bank? Why is this different than any other large development?
Shape I think is the only other project near this size and its pension money and private equity. Something like this will be private money spread around to limit risk. Unless it has changed from the original plan to be all rental. The return will be a slow return over many years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:34 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.