Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut
Oy, cynicism is the entire point of both our arguments!
If that's the logic we're going with, then Toronto should be ashamed of themselves for getting less than a quarter of their city despite being thrice as big as BC Place. Or maybe venue size is only part of the story...
---
Do you mean The Core or Eau Claire? One has basically the same built-up form as Pacific Centre's 2015 rebuild, and the other is a suburban-type mall that's expecting a near-complete teardown and rebuild (with the parking lot taking most of the density). PC can't do that with all the fully-occupied towers in the way, not without losing friggin' $$$$$ and chasing away customers that may or may not come back; gotta settle for replacing the rotunda with a 3-floor building like they're doing now. Might change when Four Seasons moves out.
|
Not sure exactly what is thrice bigger than BC Place??
Yes, I was referring to The Core. They had similar area issues as Pacific Centre with buildings, tenants etc. Where the two separate is that the Core built over the street (building multiple floors in fact) right over the roadway, thus creating space where it simply did not exist before. Here in Vancouver, that would never happen as the city has an open hate on for bridges or skyways over streets. In fact, they were kinda hoping that the skyway leading to Holt Renfrew would come down. So again, we're going the wrong way.
The Core in Calgary also reconfigured some commercial space on the lower floors of existing infrastructure, to accommodate the expansion. Those same things could be done here.
I hold out hope that the new development on Georgia and Howe will bring us something new, but in the meantime, how about we (here's where it gets scary, so hang on to your hat) why don't we try
more than just one approach to enhance the mall? Lets look to the model from our neighbours from the next province over and not only duplicate it, but surpass it, and make it our own.