HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1661  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2019, 3:07 AM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jdawgboy View Post
It's horrible they cleared those trees. They should have moved and replanted them. Disgusting!
They were absolutely replanted somewhere else. People pay a lot for grown trees.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1662  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2019, 4:23 AM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
They were absolutely replanted somewhere else. People pay a lot for grown trees.
For example: Franklins, Terry Black's, Rudy's, Pok-E-Jo's, Smokey Mo's, Salt Lick, Stubbs, La Barbeque, Iron Works, Blacks, County Line, Smokey J's, Green Mesquite, and dozens more. But I don't believe they bothered replanting them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1663  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2019, 8:25 AM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,320
You really don't wanna smoke with live oak.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1664  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2019, 4:28 PM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoOgE View Post
You really don't wanna smoke with live oak.
Cut it, stack it, age it, smoke it. Actually, I prefer Mesquite when I fire up my smoker, plus they are trash trees anyway the way they suck up so much water, I 'm all for saving as many live oaks as possible, when possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1665  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2019, 5:20 PM
murfnut murfnut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 130
.

Last edited by murfnut; Oct 31, 2019 at 6:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1666  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2019, 10:59 PM
papertowelroll papertowelroll is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoOgE View Post
You really don't wanna smoke with live oak.
Eh why not?

Post Oak is the classic BBQ wood, though. Mesquite is too smoky for something like Brisket.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1667  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2019, 11:27 PM
StoOgE StoOgE is offline
Resident Moron
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 2,320
Quote:
Originally Posted by papertowelroll View Post
Eh why not?

Post Oak is the classic BBQ wood, though. Mesquite is too smoky for something like Brisket.

Live oak is too strong. Not mesquite bad but I only use post oak.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1668  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2019, 11:42 PM
zrx299 zrx299 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 532
Quote:
Originally Posted by freerover View Post
They were absolutely replanted somewhere else. People pay a lot for grown trees.
100% replanted. I saw them being hauled out on trucks, massive root bulb intact.

Plus, you know, the whole Austin Tree Ordinance thing...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1669  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2019, 3:40 AM
murfnut murfnut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by zrx299 View Post
100% replanted. I saw them being hauled out on trucks, massive root bulb intact.

Plus, you know, the whole Austin Tree Ordinance thing...
We were watching them go down from within 045, they were not replanted. Everyone of the old trees were destroyed and very quickly, it’s amazing how fast they come down with a few hits from heavy equipment. Very sad. As far as COA , there is a chart in the details of the plans showing how many inches were lost and how many inches need to be replanted.

There are a few exceptions. There is one giant tree scheduled to be moved within the site.

There were several trees that were removed, wrapped and hauled off for planting elsewhere, we were watching that too as it took place. Those trees were actually added after the first tower was built so they were easy to take out. I assume these were the trees you saw hauled off. Those were removed because of new wastewater lines. We thought since they were carefully wrapped that they would put them back afterwards but instead they were hauled off.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1670  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2019, 3:18 PM
zrx299 zrx299 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 532
Quote:
Originally Posted by murfnut View Post
We were watching them go down from within 045, they were not replanted. Everyone of the old trees were destroyed and very quickly, it’s amazing how fast they come down with a few hits from heavy equipment. Very sad. As far as COA , there is a chart in the details of the plans showing how many inches were lost and how many inches need to be replanted.

There are a few exceptions. There is one giant tree scheduled to be moved within the site.

There were several trees that were removed, wrapped and hauled off for planting elsewhere, we were watching that too as it took place. Those trees were actually added after the first tower was built so they were easy to take out. I assume these were the trees you saw hauled off. Those were removed because of new wastewater lines. We thought since they were carefully wrapped that they would put them back afterwards but instead they were hauled off.
Hmm, well that's a shame. I definitely saw a few being transported. Guess I just assumed they would give the others a similar treatment.

Those trees definitely all looked (from afar) like they would fall under the Tree Regulations. I wonder how they got around that?

A protected size tree is determined by measuring the tree trunk at 4.5 feet above ground. This is commonly known as DBH (diameter at breast height).
A tree within the Austin city limits is protected once it reaches 19 inches. Diameter = Circumference / 3.1416 and Circumference = Diameter X 3.1416.

https://www.austintexas.gov/faq/tree-regulations
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1671  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2019, 7:28 PM
murfnut murfnut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by zrx299 View Post
Hmm, well that's a shame. I definitely saw a few being transported. Guess I just assumed they would give the others a similar treatment.

Those trees definitely all looked (from afar) like they would fall under the Tree Regulations. I wonder how they got around that?

A protected size tree is determined by measuring the tree trunk at 4.5 feet above ground. This is commonly known as DBH (diameter at breast height).
A tree within the Austin city limits is protected once it reaches 19 inches. Diameter = Circumference / 3.1416 and Circumference = Diameter X 3.1416.

https://www.austintexas.gov/faq/tree-regulations
Take a look at this page, shows which tress were removed and the calculations for replacements based on tree size.

https://abc.austintexas.gov/attachme...l83bLaHRqY0ILQ

It’s from page 74 of this

https://abc.austintexas.gov/web/perm...rtyRSN=5671031

Last edited by murfnut; Nov 3, 2019 at 7:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1672  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2019, 7:34 PM
murfnut murfnut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 130
One last comment, if you look on left of table it shows 410 inches but that does include towers which is on table on right where it jumps to 1158 inches

It boils down to cost, they will save the tree if it is more cost effective and also some are saved to provide an effect such as the large one they moved from flatiron area to the entrance of domain tower south and the one they plan on moving to the street intersection of the new towers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1673  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 12:35 AM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1674  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 7:10 PM
murfnut murfnut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 130
Here is a new item for South Domain
"The applicant is proposing to re-construct access, utilities, water quality/detention pond, etc..for future development"

I wonder if these are changes for the 045 building location. The next set of phases
https://abc.austintexas.gov/web/perm...rtyRSN=5671031
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1675  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2019, 7:16 PM
murfnut murfnut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by murfnut View Post
Here is a new item for South Domain
"The applicant is proposing to re-construct access, utilities, water quality/detention pond, etc..for future development"

I wonder if these are changes for the 045 building location. The next set of phases
https://abc.austintexas.gov/web/perm...rtyRSN=5671031
Looking closer at the details, the original plan was
22.17 acres, 965725 sq ft

The new request is for
3.73 acres, 162478.8 sq ft

so its a revision to part of the site, but the utility and water quality/detention changes could be for preparation for the 045 building future phases, similar to the original was for getting the area ready for the new set of towers (2,3,4,B)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1676  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2019, 4:01 PM
zrx299 zrx299 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 532


Photo from last night: 11/5/2019

4 buildings going up in this pic if you count the two hotels (crane visible for the one across the street on Brockton Dr; Element Hotel next to the Indeed garage).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1677  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2019, 4:28 PM
murfnut murfnut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 130
Quote:
Originally Posted by zrx299 View Post


Photo from last night: 11/5/2019

4 buildings going up in this pic if you count the two hotels (crane visible for the one across the street on Brockton Dr; Element Hotel next to the Indeed garage).
thanks, awesome picture

If you look close, to the left of the IBM sign you can see right next to the building all the equipment. There is a new wasterwater line and lift station right next to the building, as close as you can get. Took out 4-5 crape mertyls so far and a smaller live oak tree. Not sure what else will be lost when its done. Lots of noise because when they hit rock they use large jackhammers attached to the big stuff.

Everything they do seems to be with the understanding 045 won't be their much longer. They won't fix the lawn/trees by the building. Even the other day when it rained, the roof was leaking in multiple spots so they use buckets to catch the water and fans to dry it off with no plan to fix it. Happens every time it rains. I think that might be why the next update they submitted yesterday for the site is probably for additional utility changes required to deal with post-045.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1678  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2019, 5:27 PM
the Genral's Avatar
the Genral the Genral is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Between RRock and a hard place
Posts: 4,474
Alas, the end of and era for me having spent 20+ years on the IBM campus. But 045 was never an appealing assignment. There was a smell that surrounded the cafeteria that was actually unpleasant. Maybe that's just inherant to having one inside a building. I recall the same unpleasant aroma inside the Renaissance Hotel at the Arboretum. Not investing in roof repairs does make the destruction of 045 seem imminant considering the cost and probable mold issues that are occuring now. My memories of 045 is that it was very dated, dark, and smelly. Move over 045, your days are numbered...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1679  
Old Posted Nov 6, 2019, 11:52 PM
KevinFromTexas's Avatar
KevinFromTexas KevinFromTexas is offline
Meh
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Austin,TX<-->Dripping Springs,TX<-->Birmingham, AL<-->Warm Springs,GA
Posts: 57,205
FAA permit for The Bowen tower crane - 286 feet.

https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external...1999731&row=16
__________________
My girlfriend has a poodle named Kevin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1680  
Old Posted Nov 8, 2019, 11:16 PM
freerover freerover is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 2,383
Leslie Pool wants to look into a new tax district to help fund the Broadmore and Austin FC Red Line Stations. It's not a bad idea. Item is on council agenda for the 14th. The item directing the city to work with cap metro on the possibility has 5 sponsors so it should pass easily.

Quote:
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN:
The City Manager is directed to work with Capital Metro on the completion of the Broadmoor Rail Station and the McKalla Place Rail Station, assessing various public financing options that can leverage private development and funding, including conducting a feasibility and financial analysis of the creation of a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone District, or other value capture financing tools, and provide a memo to Council with the findings of the analysis by January 2020.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Texas & Southcentral > Austin
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:35 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.