Posted Sep 11, 2019, 3:04 AM
|
 |
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,804
|
|
I can understand people wishing to have more twinning done over interchanges in Golden.
That said, it looks as if two basic diamond interchanges would be relatively cheap to implement through Golden (replacing the series of lights) given that that stretch already has proper frontage roads in place and the land is available.
Also, any major highway twinning project should properly grade separate / build interchanges as much as possible regarding any related intersections involved within said upgrade. Best to build it once, not twice. Perfect example of this mistake is the twinning plan of the 97 through Peachland that involves retaining traffic lights instead of interchanges.
|
Threaded Mode