Quote:
Originally Posted by BunkyWay
So you want companies to relocate to new, glassy high-rises in Midtown, but then also want to make it harder for those Companies' employees to get to Midtown from other points in the metro. Makes perfect sense.
While you're at it, you should also argue for spending billions on MARTA expansions despite ridership declines for over a decade.
|
Justifying transit investments with short-term ridership numbers as an ROI factor is a flawed approach. That would be likened to those who try to rationalize transit shouldn't be making money given how heavily subsidized our roads are currently.
Imagine if we treated transit infrastructure as an insurance policy so that in a healthy economy we invest in expansion and increasing access regardless of the immediate pay-off of ridership.
When the economy tanks people have options to bank on when they can no longer afford the costs of driving - which is what many people did during the Great Recession.
Many of the corporate relocations along MARTA's transit lines aren't necessarily for short-term payoffs but long-term payoffs and talent recruitment - it's about resiliency.
People want options even if the current economy is doing well. If you're not positioned in a transit-accessible area what happens to your employees if they're struggling to drive to work every day?
We should be setting up our transit systems all over America for success but in today's era of "instant gratification," it's difficult to win over long-term investments when everyone wants to cash out with a short-term ROI.