Quote:
Originally Posted by OTownandDown
Truenorth, to answer your earlier question first, it takes about 10 hours to charge up 18kwh on my 120V 'standard wall plug' which I would have no problems with, but with a busy social life, occasionally I'm plugging in at midnight, and going to work at 7:30am. Add to that winter range, and I'm down to like 40km of range on a January day, or 70 in the summer without that full charge (60km and 85+km, respectively).
|
That adds a ton of context. Thanks!
For your use case, makes a lot of sense for why you installed the charger. I've also met some EV owners who simply never installed a charger because they didn't commute enough to necessitate it. I'd personally be in that category if I had an EV (bigger problem for me is living in a condo....).
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTownandDown
With a fully-dead tesla, it would take like how long, a couple days to get to 50-60kwh? Charging every single night on a 120V, 12A service would probably be acceptable for a period of time, but eventually you'd be fully dead and need a more-than-24-hour top-up.
|
Sure. But a fully dead Tesla also means you drove 400 km without charging. I think the likelihood is high that the car is going to parked a while after driving 400 km straight.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTownandDown
IF I had an issue and had to limit the Volt to only 8A service on a 120 line, I'd be up in the 12-13 hour charging time, which is way too long. Having the X5, my charge time is down to about 3.5 hours.
|
This is ultimately what I think having a charger comes down to. Convenience and time. And the question is whether this justifies the added cost. Especially in a situation where someone needs to up service to install.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTownandDown
As for Tesla and their fandom, the cars are just plain amazing.
|
Don't get me wrong. I love Teslas. I've made enough to pay for a Model 3 on the stock (if I had a place to park one!).... I know folks who work at the company. Including in the design studio. Go back 4 pages and you'll see me defending Tesla's right to proprietary charging infrastructure and preferential parking spots.
But I also think if you love EVs, you need to have a more holistic appreciation of the landscape and the electrification of transport in general. And it's really annoying when Tesla owners act like zealous converts who've discovered a new religion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTownandDown
I'd say the all-electric technology requires about 3-4 years of rapid advancement, and then we won't even be having this debate anymore.
|
There's no debate over electric cars. The debate is about what level of electrification is appropriate to each circumstance. Not everyone can or is willing to spend $50k to get a Tesla. Or even $40k to get a fully electric vehicle and then also put up with planning roadtrips around chargers and such. For some, that Volt maybe the right solution.
I think this discusison will be less myopic once more plug-ins (both BEV and PHEV) come online. By 2022, there's supposed to be about a hundred plug-in models on the market:
https://www.autonews.com/article/2018100...ied-models-slated-to-arrive-through-2022
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTownandDown
As it stands, I feel more comfortable with my little golf cart motor to get me through extra-long road trips, although I die a little inside every time the gas engine kicks on, not only for the environment, but the literal burning of money. I haven't gotten a tank of gas since early March, which is not too shabby. In the winter though, I had to fill up every 4 weeks on average.
|
I'd say you should be happy that you are doing more than most people. Personally, I don't feel a ton of guilt because I live in a condo, take public transit to work, and have cut back substantially on eating meat (for both health and environmental reasons).
I'd caution that EVs don't in any way change the other issues that cities face. An EV does nothing to combat urban sprawl. If anything, it makes the problem worse, since the folks best positioned to both use and benefit from EVs are suburban family home dwellers.
Simply driving an EV isn't going to do much if they're also heating and lighting a 3000 sqft home and living a lifestyle where 2-3 people in their household have to drive 30+ mins to work. At that point, that EV is more akin to plenary indulgence sold by the church in the middle ages than an actual honest effort at reducing their footprint.
Sort of reminds me of the recycling discussion. If you ever bring up the environment with the average person, they'll immediately get all defensive and tell you they recycle. Not too many remember that "recycle" was the third of the "three Rs" and that "Reduce" and "Reuse" were ahead of "Recycle" for a reason.