HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


    Two Gilmore Place in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Burnaby Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #781  
Old Posted May 27, 2019, 5:42 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,728
I think that this proposal illustrates well the regional economic impact of the SkyTrain Millennium Line Broadway Extension. I can't imagine that it would be coming forward as-proposed were the Broadway Extension not approved, funded, and proceeding apace.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #782  
Old Posted May 27, 2019, 5:54 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,341
Wow. A large office development in a suburb. It feels like it has been a while since we last saw one...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #783  
Old Posted May 27, 2019, 6:45 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Having such a large office tower in the suburb is an anomaly in North America, especially for an urban area the size of Metro Vancouver. However, I'm not at all surprised. Bodes well for Burnaby though, and I hope they keep it up. Having financial districts in Brentwood, Metrotown and Surrey Central in 10 years' time would be something to look forward to.

The City of Burnaby should try to rebuild that substation near Gilmore and house all the electrical structures in a building (like the Dal Grauer substation in downtown Vancouver) or even underground (convert the land into an urban park). This should be the long-term plan if they are serious to convert that area into a new financial/commercial/retail district.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #784  
Old Posted May 27, 2019, 7:02 PM
csbvan's Avatar
csbvan csbvan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 3,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Having such a large office tower in the suburb is an anomaly in North America, especially for an urban area the size of Metro Vancouver. However, I'm not at all surprised. Bodes well for Burnaby though, and I hope they keep it up. Having financial districts in Brentwood, Metrotown and Surrey Central in 10 years' time would be something to look forward to.

The City of Burnaby should try to rebuild that substation near Gilmore and house all the electrical structures in a building (like the Dal Grauer substation in downtown Vancouver) or even underground (convert the land into an urban park). This should be the long-term plan if they are serious to convert that area into a new financial/commercial/retail district.
Suburban office development was the norm in North America for quite a while. Vancouver's suburbs have actually been at risk of being completely overshadowed by the city core, including downtown and Broadway. Metro Van's suburbs have been hurting on the office front, even though the plan has always been that they would host more employment space than in the past.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #785  
Old Posted May 27, 2019, 7:57 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,792
Metrotower III was probably the last tall tower in the suburbs.
Brewery District (TransLink office was big but not tall).
Before that would have been Metrotower II and Central City.

Looking forward to Phase III at Amazing Brentwood as it will also have an office tower.
Not sure of the height though, but not likely as tall as 36 storeys
(based on the single elevator bank (of 6 elevators) on the mall floorplans).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #786  
Old Posted May 27, 2019, 8:20 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by csbvan View Post
Suburban office development was the norm in North America for quite a while. Vancouver's suburbs have actually been at risk of being completely overshadowed by the city core, including downtown and Broadway. Metro Van's suburbs have been hurting on the office front, even though the plan has always been that they would host more employment space than in the past.
I am talking about high-density large office towers such as the ones at Metrotown. Where in this country, other than Greater Toronto with its huge population, is this a common phenomenon?

Norm also means more than 50%, FYI.


Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Metrotower III was probably the last tall tower in the suburbs.
Brewery District (TransLink office was big but not tall).
Before that would have been Metrotower II and Central City.

Looking forward to Phase III at Amazing Brentwood as it will also have an office tower.
Not sure of the height though, but not likely as tall as 36 storeys
(based on the single elevator bank (of 6 elevators) on the mall floorplans).
If only these projects could all be consolidated into one area, we would have a pretty decent secondary financial district by now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #787  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2019, 8:48 PM
GilmoreStation GilmoreStation is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 465

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #788  
Old Posted Jun 5, 2019, 7:51 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,792
Different office rendering showing same design from UrbanYVR:


https://urbanyvr.com/gilmore-place-office-tower-onni
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #789  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2019, 2:14 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,025
It does look better in this rendering.

Nothing ground breaking, but it does look clean and has presence.

Also like what looks to be a lighting feature along the side.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #790  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2019, 3:03 AM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Those horizontal LED strips........
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #791  
Old Posted Jun 6, 2019, 3:35 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,429
Hoping it's reflective glass
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #792  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2019, 3:57 PM
GilmoreStation GilmoreStation is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 465
Very much looking forward to the Burnaby City Council's approval on Monday for this office project. This will put Solo District's to shame and the more reason to be living in the Gilmore-Brentwood area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #793  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2019, 7:54 PM
owenhujb owenhujb is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 225
How is having an office tower a sufficient reason to be living in the area, unless you work in it? Not to mention that the Metrotown area has three office towers and another proposed one in the Concord Sears project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #794  
Old Posted Jun 8, 2019, 10:06 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,325
Quote:
Originally Posted by owenhujb View Post
How is having an office tower a sufficient reason to be living in the area, unless you work in it? Not to mention that the Metrotown area has three office towers and another proposed one in the Concord Sears project.
Ignore GilmoreStation. He was just out for his morning sTroll. Although if Onni actually have tenants lined up, and build this, it'll be a great addition to Burnaby's office market (as it's on a transit station, and so much of Burnaby's office space is entirely car dependent). It ought to help make retail here a bit more viable, as well.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #795  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2019, 1:56 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,180
Are we sure they're not a bot? I give it about six months before the suspension turns into a ban.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #796  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2019, 2:06 AM
e-clam9 e-clam9 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 455
Concord Sears project will take forever because of the lawsuit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #797  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2019, 10:21 PM
Hmoob Hmoob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 75
Quote:
Originally Posted by owenhujb View Post
How is having an office tower a sufficient reason to be living in the area, unless you work in it? Not to mention that the Metrotown area has three office towers and another proposed one in the Concord Sears project.
Not to support any individuals here, but in an attempt to provide some perspective -

Commingled zoning definitely provides benefits to local residents, even if they commute to work in a different neighbourhood. Actively utilized office buildings mean increased daytime pedestrian traffic. More pedestrians means more eyes/less crime. It also means more customers for local shops and restaurants, enabling a more vibrant retail scene. With more customers throughout the day, retail spaces don't need to be as dependent on their evening and weekend business, so can afford to be a little less busy in those times. The result is more options for local residents than would otherwise be supportable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #798  
Old Posted Jun 9, 2019, 11:42 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hmoob View Post
Not to support any individuals here, but in an attempt to provide some perspective -

Commingled zoning definitely provides benefits to local residents, even if they commute to work in a different neighbourhood. Actively utilized office buildings mean increased daytime pedestrian traffic. More pedestrians means more eyes/less crime. It also means more customers for local shops and restaurants, enabling a more vibrant retail scene. With more customers throughout the day, retail spaces don't need to be as dependent on their evening and weekend business, so can afford to be a little less busy in those times. The result is more options for local residents than would otherwise be supportable.
Totally agreed. One of the reasons for the success of Metrotown is also because of the office towers located there. There is not a "dull" moment throughout the whole day, especially on the weekdays.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #799  
Old Posted Jun 10, 2019, 3:23 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,121
The site includes those two low rise office buildings just to the east. Isn't the plan to build the new office building than demolish the two short ones in a future phase?
__________________
belowitall
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #800  
Old Posted Jun 14, 2019, 2:52 PM
GilmoreStation GilmoreStation is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 465
Approved for public hearing on June 25th at Burnaby City Hall, has anyone attended one of these?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:49 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.