Thanks
odinthor! Great find.
That's a really interesting article but it doesn't include the location
of Section #5, the Japanese Garden. (or any of the other sections)
but it comes close...
Now, all we have to do is find an old map of Inglewood.
(get at it minions!)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Pal
E_R, as creator of this forum thread are you officially saying you don't want posters to remove watermarks?
The only instance of what you mentioned that I remember of this on NLA is when there were a series of great Kodachrome photos being posted with the green embitt scan across them and _______*_ had removed a few of those watermarks and he related that the seller had notified him not to do it.
*I know who it is but not sure I should say.
Anyway, it makes me wonder, are there internet rules about removing watermarks? I know eBay sellers do it as they're selling things that otherwise might not sell without those watermarks, but a lot of what they're selling gets sold and never seen again, so removing them after they're sold? Problem? I don't know.
Selfishly, I love whenever someone removes watermarks on photos I like, but I'd also rather see a photo with one than not see it at all.
|
I agree with everything you said,
Martin... especially your last sentence.
The situation you mentioned was the one I was referring to. (as far as I know it's the only time it has happened)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Pal
E_R, as creator of this forum thread are you officially saying you don't want posters to remove watermarks?
|
No, I am not but I thought I should inform
Scott Charles what had happened in the past.
(I don't believe Ebay sellers could legally stop a person from removing their nonbinding watermarks)
The Ebay seller(s) should take into consideration how many potential buyers we send their way.
.