Quote:
Originally Posted by EastVanMark
You better believe it, cause that's exactly what I'm doing.
Didn't mean to blame them alone however; the province also had a hand in the debacle. 
If you are impressed by the current casino, you would have had a full on heart attack if some of the original proposals went through. You talk theatres? How about more than one. Hotel rooms? Over 1000 in the one proposal which would have been Vancouver's biggest. Plus A LOT more. Oh well. 
And they JUST fell behind on their construction debt? That's a lot like saying, you bring in enough money for heat, food, and to keep the lights on in your home, but its JUST the mortgage you cant pay. Thats a pretty big problem. And btw even if you somehow remove the debt, those figures are still not that impressive considering you are the only player in the downtown area of a major city. Their are suburban casinos in the middle of nowhere in the States that do much better. |
Your solution is to build bigger? Bigger debt? Bigger problems?
I saw plenty of proposals thanks. I'm old enough to remember the waterfront version that was axed long ago.
You'll twist yourself into some serious logic puzzles to blame those filthy Vision Vancouver governments.
Threaded Mode