HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5141  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2019, 10:17 PM
meman meman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 279
Some news on E-Born Books and City Weekly.

I was talking to an employee of Eborn books this morning and he said that they had until the end of the year to vacate the building at 254 s. Main.
He said that the building was going to be renovated by the owners and he did not know where Eborn Books would be re-located to at this point in time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5142  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2019, 10:29 PM
bob rulz bob rulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,616
I just don't like kicking out popular, local staples for the sake of renovation. Even if they're not torn down, I don't like it.

How much do we all want to bet that they're going to be replaced with national chain stores that can afford higher rent?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5143  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2019, 10:34 PM
bob rulz bob rulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by msbutah View Post
Wow y’all know how to run with something. I never said it was being bulldozed. I go to coffee garden daily and the staff there was telling us that the book store has been told to leave as has city weekly in 6 weeks. Could just be them trying to turnover tenants into higher paying ones.
Well when someone drops something like that without context, and given the history of construction in this city (and well most other cities), I think some concern is warranted.

I'm not sure if those buildings are protected for their historic status, but I'm sure the city would try to give any developer hell if they wanted to tear them down.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah_Amazing View Post
I was simply posting an opinion, not a fact. I dream of a future not always beholden to the past. Apparently, that is no a longer a welcome opinion on this site. I thought I found a place where we can openly share ideas, even if they may be a little controversial, as long as they were done so in a respectful manner. Unfortunately, you have all decided to start behaving like bullies, attacking me (the number of posts I have made), and not even giving what I said fair consideration (namely, should we really have 1 floor buildings in the heart of CBD). Due to this, I feel I am no longer welcome to participate in any future conversations.
In my (admittedly limited) experience, unless you are a city like Chicago or New York, the cities that have bulldozed all of their historic one, two, three-story etc buildings in their central area and replaced them with sleek, modern office towers are the ones that also feel the most lifeless. It's no coincidence that Main Street has much more life than State Street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5144  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2019, 8:34 AM
Blah_Amazing Blah_Amazing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade View Post
I probably post the most controversial opinions here, and I've been called a lot worse, but why do I give a ---- what some randos online think? I state my opinion. If you don't like it, piss off. Take that attitude and you'll be just fine.
Thank you for your advice. I don't fully agree, but I will at least take some of it.

1. The past. What concerns me is I said that we should "a future not ALWAYS beholden to the past," and yet clearly nobody actually read that part of my comment (Old&New in particular cut out the 'always' entirely). Instead, some of you acted as it I wanted to demolish and burn everything and dance on the ashes. I love many of the historic buildings in SLC. In future, Please read the whole comment carefully before you respond.

2. Behavior. No, I am not 'SLC Projects' that you keep talking about. But if someone else felt that your behavior and treatment of others is out of line, then I think that says a lot about how people on the forum are treating others (note: I do not know the circumstances surrounding SLC Projects). I have followed this site on and off for years, even created an account a couple years ago in hopes of commenting in the future. I used to look up to all of you, enjoying all of the amazing things you would post and talk about. Now, I know better. I assume most of you are adults, likely significantly older then myself. I do not presume in any way to parent you. But I think all of us need to start treating each other with more respect. When you discussed SLC Projects, it comes off to me as almost mocking and proud that you insulted and attacked someone off of this site. That is not okay! I can't force you, but I hope you will be more friendly in future. I will absolutely try and do so. Though, I suspect at least some of you will try and attack me anyway for simply calling for all of us (including myself), to rise above and treat each other with the respect I think we all deserve.

3. Other Ideas. I am not opposed to other ideas. I was on my high school debate team after all. To simply chalk up someone concerned that people are taking what you say out of context or blowing them out of proportion as 'opposed to other ideas' is incorrect and misconstruing the situation.

4. Outlandish. One of the things I find most concerning is the rising opinion on this site on the need to apparently preserve anything and everything that is old. One of you even called me saying that I would like to take down a series of rickety old 1 floor buildings (that yes, house some great things, but street level can easily be replicated/ improved) on Main Street between two far more beautiful historical buildings as "outlandish (Old&New)."

5. Preserve or die. This opinion of preserve or nothing has doomed many cities now to a future of ruin. San Francisco is a perfect example. SF is a place where developers have to spend millions of dollars and years, often decades, trying to convince people that tearing down a single building won't destroy the 'character' of the city. I have heard it often called a 'museum city,' a place so wrapped up in preserving the past that it is virtually unlivable. A place so focused on maintaining the old that they are almost ALWAYS beholden to it. Now, it stands as either a slum or city only the ultra-rich can afford. Yes, a few projects make it through now and then, but only after every resource is spent fighting it. If we followed the path some of you appear (at least to me) to promote, that future will be ours as well.

6. Greek Orthodox Church buildings. It is my opinion that we should honor and love our city's past, but we cannot give it power or control over us. We should preserve the best we have, but also learn to let go as well. To whoever it was that said their grandma grew up there, so it should be preserved (if I remember correctly), for any building set for demolition, there will always be a story like yours. Cities are filled with people, memories, and ideas. That is why so many of us love them. That doesn't mean the buildings deserve to be preserved and prevent new people to enjoy discovering what new things can be created. Otherwise, if we followed your opinion, we would still live in a city filled with rickety pioneer buildings and the tallest thing here would be the Temple. We all need to learn how to let go and allow the future to build something new that future people can love and remember. That doesn't mean everything, but it does mean most things. The longer we continue to develop, and the easy sites like parking lots are all redeveloped and built out, this will be something SLC will have to increasingly grapple with.

7. 254 Main. As for 254 main, the interior is, in my opinion, ugly, cramped, and needs (at the very least) a complete overall or eventual tear-down. Not everything in a city should be based on outward appearances and facades. But I fear that is all that matters to some of you. That said, I would also argue that the images that were being used were also misleading, showing only the nicest half of the span of this group of buildings' facades (and it is mostly just facades you seem attached too), rather then the building where SLC Weekly is, which I find to be a rather gray, bland, and a relatively depressing structure to walk by. It sounds like they are renovating the structure, rather then demolishing it anyway, which I am fine with. But something needed to be done to those buildings. Also, I apologize if any of you feel that I need to find a more diplomatic words than 'ugly' and if this, as some of you put it 'triggers' you, then please let me know and I will work to correct that in the future.

8. Not backing down. It was wrong of me to allow a few insensitive (as diplomatic as I am willing to put it) individuals get me down. I will not allow that to happen in the future. I can't control this site, or the people on it, but I can control my own actions. I will continue to voice what I think, though I will do so with the upmost respect and common decency that every individual deserves.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5145  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2019, 5:47 PM
Stenar's Avatar
Stenar Stenar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 3,234
Well, this proves one thing. He's not SLC Projects. Projects couldn't write this coherently. And FYI: Projects was hostile and made this forum unenjoyable, so I'm not sad he's gone.

You'd better develop a thick skin to survive here. Opinions are constantly challenged here. I don't think any of the responses to you were insensitive. Maybe you're too sensitive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5146  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2019, 9:10 PM
ajiuO's Avatar
ajiuO ajiuO is offline
A.K.A. Vigo
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
Well said Hatman, and I hope it does happen. The Olympics would be the perfect excuse to build a central station that the entire metro could be proud of. As far as mass transit in general, I just wish you had a magic wand.




I hope your wrong Wasatch. I've liked most of the other renderings of the project, but this particular rendering is a gross misstep. They should never have released it in the first place, if they were actually trying to impress anyone. I'm hoping that the laughable rendering will result in a pleasant surprise when the actual Hotel is completed. I'm remembering one of the most demonstrated renderings of 222 S. Main, and how some of us had to talk a few people down from the edge of a cliff. When we could finally make out the actual tower, everyone was majorly relieved. I'm hoping the the quality materials that will be used on this project, and the piss poor rendering will result in a pleasant surprise for all of us.

Taking a second look at this rendering from this angle I realize how my past hopes were that Gateway's design was going to have a very historic quality to it. At least that's how Boyer presented in its initial drawings. I still have a pretty poor opinion of how Boyer finished the surfaces of Gateway. It seems like the current owners have a good feel for its resurrection. The way Gateway was going, anything that has happened these past couple of years since the new owners took over seems like a big plus.

The site lines of this plaza will never win any rewards, but I guess from a business perspective things are looking up big time for Gateway.

A rendering of an eight-story hotel being proposed in The Gateway around the west face of the historic Union Pacific Depot.


I have to say I really like this particular layout

https://media.deseretdigital.com/file/575ba00528?resize=width_1200&type=png&c=6&a=ba586585

.
I’m very much apposed to turning the depot in to a hotel and building that 8 story appendage there. They should tear down Megaplex 12 and build it there instead.
__________________
On a mountain of skulls, in the castle of pain, I sat on a
throne of blood! What was will be! What is will be no more! Now is the season of evil!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5147  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2019, 9:19 PM
airhero airhero is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 967
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajiuO View Post
I’m very much apposed to turning the depot in to a hotel and building that 8 story appendage there. They should tear down Megaplex 12 and build it there instead.
The Megaplex probably brings more people to the Gateway than any other single thing there. You may hate it but I'm sure in financial terms it wouldn't make sense to get rid of it. I go there all the time. It's the only theater anywhere near the downtown area.

I am not fond of the hotel plans either, though. I wish it could go on the west side of olympic plaza. None of the retail spaces there are even being used.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5148  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2019, 9:43 PM
Stenar's Avatar
Stenar Stenar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 3,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by ajiuO View Post
I’m very much apposed to turning the depot in to a hotel and building that 8 story appendage there. They should tear down Megaplex 12 and build it there instead.
I was thinking they should build a tower hotel where Barnes & Noble is. I wouldn't mind a tower off to the side behind the depot, but this monstrosity behind the entire depot is terrible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5149  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2019, 10:01 PM
Hatman's Avatar
Hatman Hatman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 1,434
Building a tower where the Barnes and Nobel building is an even better option now that it is the building where Barnes and Nobel was. Since no customers are there now, it would be easy to tear out and replace with a nice tower.

The new design is just so strange - the Gateway was designed to match with the architecture of the Depot. You can see it in the designs of the the metal roofs (like on the clock tower) and the little circle windows spread around the apartment buildings. Now they plan to essentially build a wall between the mall and the building that inspired the mall's aesthetic. I don't get it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5150  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2019, 10:05 PM
Stenar's Avatar
Stenar Stenar is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 3,234
Or they could tear down the shops to the west of B&N, where Boyer originally planned to build a hotel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5151  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2019, 11:07 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stenar View Post
Or they could tear down the shops to the west of B&N, where Boyer originally planned to build a hotel.
That strip west of Barnes and Noble has always reminded me of those temporary fronts they put up during the Olympics where 222 is now located. They've always seemed like place keepers to me. I hope there are future plans to redevelop that stretch with something of a higher quality and some height.

While the current location of the Hotel is not my favorite, I get why they're banking on the extra convenience to the Arena and TRAX. You can bet that that is going to be one of the most booked up Hotels in the City. Ten years from now we'll be educating a few newer forum members on how dismal things were looking at Gateway at one time. They'll wonder how that was possible.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5152  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2019, 11:39 PM
Orpheum Orpheum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 170
Quote:
Originally Posted by stenar View Post
or they could tear down the shops to the west of b&n, where boyer originally planned to build a hotel.
this.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5153  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2019, 5:04 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,615
Yeah...plenty of decent areas to build a hotel mid-rise. Not sure why they're going to block the back-end of one of SLC's most iconic buildings (well, maybe not iconic...but, you get the point).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5154  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2019, 5:07 AM
Old&New's Avatar
Old&New Old&New is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob rulz View Post
I just don't like kicking out popular, local staples for the sake of renovation. Even if they're not torn down, I don't like it.

How much do we all want to bet that they're going to be replaced with national chain stores that can afford higher rent?
Maybe Boyer (owner of Chase Bank Building (Utah One Center)) or the owner of the Wells Fargo Building can convert either of their respective building's ground floors into retail space. Then eborn books and city weekly could just move across Main Street.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5155  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2019, 6:56 PM
ThePusherMan's Avatar
ThePusherMan ThePusherMan is offline
One Thing At A Time
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatman View Post
Building a tower where the Barnes and Nobel building is an even better option now that it is the building where Barnes and Nobel was. Since no customers are there now, it would be easy to tear out and replace with a nice tower.
The old Barnes and Nobel spot will soon be home to Punch Bowl Social. Another entertainment concept similar to Dave & Buster's but less of a focus on arcade and redemption games and more on things like bowling, shuffle board etc. Still unsure if it will be 21+ but regardless should be another good addition to the Gateway. Also, I saw mention in an article of a possible market making Gateway it's home. The west side may actually get a grocery store or at least something close to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5156  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2019, 6:58 PM
ThePusherMan's Avatar
ThePusherMan ThePusherMan is offline
One Thing At A Time
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 412
Alright, who's gunna be our Tower 8 photo update person. Who works closest? I know there isn't much to see right now, just some hole digging, but I'm hoping we get more photo updates on this one than we did on 111.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5157  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2019, 8:25 PM
delts145's Avatar
delts145 delts145 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Downtown Los Angeles
Posts: 20,551
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePusherMan View Post
The old Barnes and Nobel spot will soon be home to Punch Bowl Social. Another entertainment concept similar to Dave & Buster's but less of a focus on arcade and redemption games and more on things like bowling, shuffle board etc. Still unsure if it will be 21+ but regardless should be another good addition to the Gateway. Also, I saw mention in an article of a possible market making Gateway it's home. The west side may actually get a grocery store or at least something close to it.

Wasn't there an announcement a few months back about there being a grocer/market going in at the Gateway...maybe I'm wrong?

Also, has there been any confirmation that Punch Bowl Social would have a bowling alley? That would be something that many forumers had wished for for some time now, to have a new generation classy bowling alley downtown.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5158  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2019, 9:28 PM
Utahn Utahn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 73
Quote:
Originally Posted by delts145 View Post
Wasn't there an announcement a few months back about there being a grocer/market going in at the Gateway...maybe I'm wrong?

Also, has there been any confirmation that Punch Bowl Social would have a bowling alley? That would be something that many forumers had wished for for some time now, to have a new generation classy bowling alley downtown.
The Store, a fine foods grocer, is coming to the Gateway. It'll be across from the Children's Museum. More info here: http://shopthegateway.com/directory/specialty/the-store-fine-foods-market/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5159  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2019, 9:31 PM
Pencil's Avatar
Pencil Pencil is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 145
Can someone also get pictures of the Food Alley that's going to go up on state street?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5160  
Old Posted Apr 26, 2019, 10:06 PM
bob rulz bob rulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePusherMan View Post
Alright, who's gunna be our Tower 8 photo update person. Who works closest? I know there isn't much to see right now, just some hole digging, but I'm hoping we get more photo updates on this one than we did on 111.
I'm not sure I want to reveal exactly where I work, but I would be shocked if I wasn't closest, which is why I have been posting photo updates already and don't plan to stop any time soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:30 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.