HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #14241  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2019, 2:02 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
845 W Madison

April 06



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14242  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2019, 2:04 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
Union West - 933 W Washington

April 06

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14243  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2019, 1:14 PM
UrbanLibertine UrbanLibertine is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
Don't know if it's been mentioned already, but there are several sites for sale that likely would be redeveloped in the future:
  • Rainforest Cafe in River North
  • Site north of SONU apartments on Fremont (was supposed to be a hotel)
  • Vitamin Shoppe on North Ave as well as the four buildings to the south on Clybourn

Also, the City Colleges HQ building on Jackson and Franklin is being converted into a Hilton Garden Inn + Canopy hotel with rooftop bar. Should help add some life to the Loop outside business hours.
Nothing would make me happier than getting rid of that damn Rainforest Cafe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14244  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2019, 2:52 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,350
Killing time at McCormick waiting for a trade show to start.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14245  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2019, 4:48 PM
HomrQT's Avatar
HomrQT HomrQT is offline
All-American City Boy
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Hinsdale / Uptown, Chicago
Posts: 1,956
^^^^

Wow, if you removed all the buildings that have been built in the past 10 years from that image, you'd have a very different looking skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14246  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2019, 8:54 PM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by HomrQT View Post
^^^^

Wow, if you removed all the buildings that have been built in the past 10 years from that image, you'd have a very different looking skyline.
Hell, back it up to 2002 and at least half of the buildings showing are gone and Soldier Field doesn't have a space ship on it
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14247  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2019, 9:46 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonoboZill4 View Post
Hell, back it up to 2002 and at least half of the buildings showing are gone and Soldier Field doesn't have a space ship on it
10yrs ago - May 17 2009

Chicago - 2008 by Harry Carmichael, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14248  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2019, 10:49 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,350
Looking south from Morgan St. station

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14249  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2019, 12:41 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,350
Morgan St.




Madison and Green
I think this is called a "Harry"

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14250  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2019, 10:10 PM
Hourstrooper's Avatar
Hourstrooper Hourstrooper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 187
352 north union tower

https://www.chicagoarchitecture.org/2019...re-parking-352-north-union-moving-ahead/

353 n union moving along should start relatively soon but with a height reduction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14251  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2019, 11:04 PM
The Lurker The Lurker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Great Lakes
Posts: 720
ChicagoArchitecture does it again.
"410 feet making it the 96th tallest building in Chicago."
At 410 feet this building would rank about 200.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14252  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2019, 1:26 AM
Ricochet48 Ricochet48 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: River North, Chicago
Posts: 193
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14253  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2019, 1:36 AM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hourstrooper View Post
https://www.chicagoarchitecture.org/2019...re-parking-352-north-union-moving-ahead/

353 n union moving along should start relatively soon but with a height reduction.
Plus more parking. But no mention about number of apartments
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14254  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2019, 1:39 AM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Last time I visited Chicago and in the West Loop, I couldn't help but notice how bad traffic had become. I'm not joking or making fun of NIMBYs but they seriously need to figure that out before the neighborhood adds thousands of more people who all want their cars.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14255  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2019, 1:57 AM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Last time I visited Chicago and in the West Loop, I couldn't help but notice how bad traffic had become. I'm not joking or making fun of NIMBYs but they seriously need to figure that out before the neighborhood adds thousands of more people who all want their cars.
I walk around the west loop at least once a week - no problem ;-)

Also do drive around once a month or so, not bad at all.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14256  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2019, 2:13 AM
healthiswealth healthiswealth is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Chicago
Posts: 21
Don't know how to copy pics, but that skyline shot from the south in post 14321..wow. Probably an unpopular opinion here, but part of the reason that shot's so good is no Sears. Changes the skyline. Sears has one great angle, another ok one and the rest...no comment.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14257  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2019, 3:17 AM
ardecila's Avatar
ardecila ardecila is offline
TL;DR
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the city o'wind
Posts: 17,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
Last time I visited Chicago and in the West Loop, I couldn't help but notice how bad traffic had become. I'm not joking or making fun of NIMBYs but they seriously need to figure that out before the neighborhood adds thousands of more people who all want their cars.
I work in the West Loop and experience it daily... There are some traffic issues but they’re pretty localized to certain blocks. Definitely not gridlock, CDOT just needs to make some tweaks, which is an ongoing process. And honestly most of the problem is because the city has been slow to add traffic signals to intersections. Right now there are too many four-way stops, which is great for the pedestrians but really snarls traffic.

They are supposed to add a few signals along Lake which will ease the congestion there. Randolph is more complicated because of the service drives, but there is discussion of eliminating these to create a pedestrian mall with traffic pushed either to the center or the edges.

Lastly, where do you get the idea that all the new residents are bringing cars? That’s like a NIMBY mantra and it isn’t borne out in the fact that most residential developments have parking ratios around 0.5:1 and most office developments are providing zero parking, Sterling Bay’s big projects notwithstanding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14258  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2019, 3:44 AM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,443
^^^ Exactly, the single biggest traffic issue in the area is Lake Street which needs to have 4 way stops because you have mass transit dumping pedestrians out onto a street that has extremely limited visibility. The congestion on Lake runs almost non stop from Ashland to the river. I drive my big — work truck with huge blind spots to your office all the time and never have an issue as long as I stay off Lake.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14259  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2019, 3:48 AM
BonoboZill4's Avatar
BonoboZill4 BonoboZill4 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: PingPong
Posts: 1,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hourstrooper View Post
https://www.chicagoarchitecture.org/2019...re-parking-352-north-union-moving-ahead/

353 n union moving along should start relatively soon but with a height reduction.
Borderline unreadable article with the attempts at humor, and as Lurker pointed out, Editor is hitting hard with the inaccuracies once again...

Regardless, that tower should have some good impact when viewed along the Kennedy and fills in a nasty empty lot, so double win
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14260  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2019, 12:03 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
I was really only talking about a few streets, so I agree with you. Randolph at a few times was not good, but sometimes completely fine. Also I didn't say that the new residents are right now all about their cars. I was poking fun with that statement talking about when and if a lot more residential towers come to west loop, watch out for the parking increases like in other parts of downtown.


In any case, it's awesome that it might be moving forward. These big vacant lots hurt my eyes and my soul.

Last edited by marothisu; Apr 10, 2019 at 12:15 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:33 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.