Quote:
Originally Posted by giallo
The solutions to this problem isn't an easy fix. Even if you lack empathy for people who are really down and out/addicted, and would like to see the government get tough on drug users, society will feel it one way or another.
(1)No free handouts? Just watch the B&Es, muggings and home invasions explode as addicts do anything to get their fix.
(2)Throw them in jail? Well, you're paying for it. Where will you put all of these newly convicted criminals? Do you have any idea how much it costs to build and run a prison?
(3)I have empathy for addicts, as it usually stems from some real hardships in life - physical and mental abuse as a child is a main factor that leads to 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 addiction throughout one's life. I've had a few friends that have suffered greatly from addiction, and believe me, they'd do anything not to be addicted. The problem is twofold though; the drugs ease the pain of addiction and whatever pain they are dealing with mentally. It's a very hard cycle to break, and we still haven't found an easy (pardon the pun) fix.
(4)I'm sure there are plenty of politicians that would love to stop giving addicts money every month to feed their addiction or to throw them in jail, but they know it'd be political suicide because you'd either see a massive spike in crime or you'd have to raise taxes.
(5)What you're seeing is the effect of living in a free society. We don't jail our way out of this.
|
(1) I suppose you are suggesting society to spoil people by giving more free handouts so that they won't break into your cars, houses, etc. Well guess what, despite giving free handouts all this time, it is still happening: I see it all the time. Smashed car windows, store fronts, lawlessness, etc. Drug addiction and the greed and craving know no bounds. No matter how much money is handed out to individuals, it is never enough. Stopping the addiction and the supply of drugs is key to solving the problem.
(2) Yup, we only end up paying for it if inmates stay in prison for free. Make them work and produce something useful like they used to. I rather use my tax money to pay for better prisons with drug and mental health treatment than supporting "outdoor tent hospitals and In-site", subsidized housing, modular housing, higher property taxes from city due to increased maintenance cost, etc.
(3) So do you just leave the drug addicts or your friends out there to slowly, painfully, and constantly tortured and abused by drug pushers to their death? Also, not every addict had been abused as a kid, and I don't get why people keep using that as an excuse. Some are just irresponsible pricks trying to get high, and don't give a hoot about society. I don't know your friends, but if we have a good treatment facility, we can put all your friends into it to get clean. You said it yourself, " they'd do anything not to be addicted". Trust me, sometimes going cold turkey or given alternative treatment is the key. You DON'T just leave them out there to die! (Watch Seattle is Dying: last part about what Rhode Island is doing is indeed sobering)
(4) So not true, and that is misinformation. If those who deserve jail time are incarcerated, how can there be a spike in crime? Politicians are giving out free handouts and giving free drugs to addicts now as we speak, and cirme, drug addiction and fentanyl deaths are getting worse.
(5) Nothing works in extremities, and what you see in DTES is the effect of living in a free society in its extremity. Sometimes control is necessary, or we wouldn't be having law and enforcement. Ideally humans should all be able to behave for the sake of the majority, but that will never happen.
There is a scourge today affecting west coat cities like San Francisco, Seattle and Vancouver. Well it all started fairly innocently in the 60s and coined something rather cool like being hippie: we are paying for it today.
If other cities around the world can do it better, so can we. We just need to get out of our ego-centric mentality, and stop giving excuses!