HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3461  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 1:50 AM
EspionNoir's Avatar
EspionNoir EspionNoir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 635
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpg_Guy View Post
bomberjet was mistaken, it's not for sale, they are advertising space for lease.

That looks nice
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3462  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 1:51 AM
EspionNoir's Avatar
EspionNoir EspionNoir is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 635
Quote:
Originally Posted by michelleb View Post
"KidThink" at 200 Portage (Scotiabank) does seem to be dead though: "Up to 3 contiguous full floors available"

This listing updated a week ago seems to confirm it: "This flagship building offers incredible **signage opportunities** for key tenants on both the exterior of the building, as well as building lobbies and elevators."
I always think that prime location is better for something else. KidThink idea is fantastic, but in the long run I think the space should belong to something different.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3463  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 1:04 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Are we sure that the KidThink project is dead, at least as far as 200 Portage is concerned? After all, the leasing page mentions 3 floors being available, but that still leaves a fair bit of room for the KidThink project, if it's still going forward.

But as I've said before, that always seemed like a weird location for something like that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3464  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 3:25 PM
dmacc dmacc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,712
Next Page:





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3465  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 4:10 PM
joshlemer joshlemer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 148
Wasn't there an agreement between the city and either the Richardson building owner or the RBC building owner that no building could be built taller, within Winnipeg? Did that agreement expire and that's why this new tower is possible?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3466  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 4:54 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshlemer View Post
Wasn't there an agreement between the city and either the Richardson building owner or the RBC building owner that no building could be built taller, within Winnipeg? Did that agreement expire and that's why this new tower is possible?
I have never heard of such an agreement. Why would the City ever enter into such an agreement?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3467  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 5:04 PM
joshlemer joshlemer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 148
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
I have never heard of such an agreement. Why would the City ever enter into such an agreement?
Okay then maybe it was just a rumour.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3468  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 5:23 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,945
Good to see the concrete pump working away. I cant wait to see some structural steel and the form of the tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3469  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 8:30 PM
ediger ediger is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 107
the reduced height of the middle section may make it less noticeable from aerial photos but man, that's going to make a huge difference from the sidewalk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3470  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2019, 11:20 PM
Wolf13 Wolf13 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by ediger View Post
the reduced height of the middle section may make it less noticeable from aerial photos but man, that's going to make a huge difference from the sidewalk.
I don'd know if the renderings appropriately accommodate the rise on the parking loop... because although I'd prefer 4 floors, that single floor looks quite large in person.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3471  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2019, 3:42 AM
Kris22 Kris22 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 736
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
Good to see the concrete pump working away. I cant wait to see some structural steel and the form of the tower.
Tell me about it. I was expecting structural steel last fall and I check the live cam everyday hoping to see a beam. Hopefully within a couple weeks? Anyone have some inside info on this?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3472  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2019, 3:54 AM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3473  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2019, 5:59 PM
borkborkbork's Avatar
borkborkbork borkborkbork is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,761
thank god the kidthink thing is dead. the last thing P&M should be anchored by is a vanity-project social service in class a space. great to have autism services downtown, but there's a million perfectly reasonable (and massively less expensive) spaces it could go into.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3474  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2019, 6:19 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ From a pragmatic standpoint, they could a) up the amount of space by going in a less pricy building (like, say, some Exchange District renovated warehouse), or b) reduce the amount of money they need by taking up the same amount of space for less money. That project always sounded off, right from day one.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3475  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2019, 7:31 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 8,709
Was the idea Of KidThink going there because the founders also own that building? Therefor it would be reasonable to assume they wouldn’t charge themselves rent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3476  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2019, 8:19 PM
borkborkbork's Avatar
borkborkbork borkborkbork is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpg_Guy View Post
Was the idea Of KidThink going there because the founders also own that building? Therefor it would be reasonable to assume they wouldn’t charge themselves rent.
i guess they realized what the CRA would think of such a plan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3477  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2019, 9:32 PM
wardlow's Avatar
wardlow wardlow is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 631
Quote:
Originally Posted by joshlemer View Post
Wasn't there an agreement between the city and either the Richardson building owner or the RBC building owner that no building could be built taller, within Winnipeg? Did that agreement expire and that's why this new tower is possible?
I doubt there ever was such an agreement, but the idea sounds small-time cronyistic and legally dubious enough to have actually been floated around in Winnipeg.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3478  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2019, 11:13 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
Based on the fact that GoodLife will be occupying the main (now only) floor of 330, I'd say it's fair to assume the skylight to Winnipeg Square won't be reopened, which is a bit of a shame – feels much different (worse) down there now. Oh well.

They've been tearing down some of the concrete wall/planters on the sidewalk/loading loop. The renders didn't really detail these areas much, curious to see how it turns out. I'd like to see the loop feel a little more "open" to the sidewalk. I'd also sacrifice the planters along Main for more sidewalk space, as that's a really busy bus stop and the sidewalk is tiny. Nowhere to hide from getting splashed by mud puddles lol.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3479  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 4:44 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 16,383
I was thinking it is maintained. There is an area of the building that extends higher than the roof of the hollow cored area, in which Goodlife will be it seems. And this is right overtop of where the opening is to the square. They didn't install any beams or anything over the opening. Just framed it in with drywalll to cover it during construction. My thoughts anyways. We'll see.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3480  
Old Posted Mar 22, 2019, 6:11 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,945
I have to say, that is a pretty nice streetwall on the south side of Hargrave. We really need something on the Canada Post and Cargill lots (that's what I call them). Must be at least 10 storeys tall.

Quote:
Originally Posted by dmacc View Post
Next Page:

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
   
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:21 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.