HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #13941  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 7:17 PM
gandalf612 gandalf612 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Andersonville, Chicago
Posts: 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdj View Post
I live on S. Calumet, facing the lake, next to McCormick. Aside from the droning of LSD traffic and the dinging of the Metra, this area is generally a quiet, low key enclave. Many people who live here moved here for that exact reason.
Sorry, but there should be no expectation of having a quiet suburban enclave in the downtown of the third largest city in the US.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13942  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 7:22 PM
OrdoSeclorum OrdoSeclorum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdj View Post

To those who have replied “OMG SO AWESOME BUILD NOW!”, have you ever lived next door to a construction site? For 15 years? Are you just reacting to the sparkly CGI renderings (which make what will in reality be a very cramped sliver of space look sprawling)? Or do you actually see some benefit?
I mean, my grandmother is 90. Her mother was born in 1891, when post-Chicago was 20 years old and the Czech immigrants who were going to build Pilsen hadn't moved here yet. Nearly 100% of Chicago was built during the lifetimes of two people I know/knew. So this position seems pretty weird when you think about it that way? If my great aunts has said, "Oh, man. Do you know how bad it's going to suck to live here while they build THE ENTIRE LOOP? Do you actually see some benefit to building the entire Loop?"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13943  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 7:24 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago to London
Posts: 1,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdj View Post
Joined this forum just to reply to this.

So I assume you live in the neighborhood? If so, how do you see it as a good thing? I was at the meeting. There were a lot of valid major concerns aired.

I live on S. Calumet, facing the lake, next to McCormick. Aside from the droning of LSD traffic and the dinging of the Metra, this area is generally a quiet, low key enclave. Many people who live here moved here for that exact reason. I would never intentionally move behind a lakefront building, and certainly not behind a mall or a transit hub. And yet here it all potentially comes.

I won’t stick around long enough to see my view destroyed, so that’s not my main concern.

In the short term I’m more NIMBY about the noise and chaos from construction.

Long term, I’m saddened by the continuing Kardashification of America. Everything has to be as massive and glitzy and glamorous as possible at all times, whether it benefits anyone or not. In the face of climate change and income inequality, projects like these tempt fate.

To those who have replied “OMG SO AWESOME BUILD NOW!”, have you ever lived next door to a construction site? For 15 years? Are you just reacting to the sparkly CGI renderings (which make what will in reality be a very cramped sliver of space look sprawling)? Or do you actually see some benefit?
Welcome to the forum! Of course, you just want to NIMBY away and ignore the difference of opinions of some of the forumers, but YAY FOR YOU!

Like most here, I doubt very much that this will be built as shown, but sorry, something WILL be built here, the tracks WILL be covered and you WILL have neighbors to the East.

You said - "this area is generally a quiet, low key enclave. Many people who live here moved here for that exact reason. " - You should have looked at the zoning for the area and the fact that some sort of development over the tracks has been planned since the late 1980's. It's like the people living on E. Randolph complaining about Lake Shore East, trying to stop it, even though the original plans dated to the early '70's

Sorry to be so harsh. I think some of the elements of this plan are stupid (decking over LSC), and the scale is much and they need to show how to connect to the street grid, such as it is in that land o'cul de sacs.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13944  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 7:26 PM
woodrow woodrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicago to London
Posts: 1,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom In Chicago View Post
Welcome to the forum. . . but calm down. . . this isn't getting built. . .

. . .
I agree with this project as shown, but SOMETHING will get built there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13945  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 8:24 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
Lincoln Park Commons

March 5



March 9

















__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13946  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 8:47 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by harryc View Post

^ Those ornamented archways are a pleasant surprise!

Was this a rehab or a new construction? If the latter, then that's a nice little touch
__________________
Supercar Adventures is my YouTube channel:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC4WNEwTDZlUKB1w8ED5bV2Q

People who say housing is a human right deserve to be homeless
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13947  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 8:58 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Those ornamented archways are a pleasant surprise!

Was this a rehab or a new construction? If the latter, then that's a nice little touch
Totally new.
__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13948  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 8:59 PM
glowrock's Avatar
glowrock glowrock is offline
Becoming Chicago-fied!
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Chicago (West Avondale)
Posts: 19,442
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdj View Post
Joined this forum just to reply to this.

So I assume you live in the neighborhood? If so, how do you see it as a good thing? I was at the meeting. There were a lot of valid major concerns aired.

I live on S. Calumet, facing the lake, next to McCormick. Aside from the droning of LSD traffic and the dinging of the Metra, this area is generally a quiet, low key enclave. Many people who live here moved here for that exact reason. I would never intentionally move behind a lakefront building, and certainly not behind a mall or a transit hub. And yet here it all potentially comes.

I won’t stick around long enough to see my view destroyed, so that’s not my main concern.

In the short term I’m more NIMBY about the noise and chaos from construction.

Long term, I’m saddened by the continuing Kardashification of America. Everything has to be as massive and glitzy and glamorous as possible at all times, whether it benefits anyone or not. In the face of climate change and income inequality, projects like these tempt fate.

To those who have replied “OMG SO AWESOME BUILD NOW!”, have you ever lived next door to a construction site? For 15 years? Are you just reacting to the sparkly CGI renderings (which make what will in reality be a very cramped sliver of space look sprawling)? Or do you actually see some benefit?
Wow. Just... Wow...

I've lived next to major construction sites before, and yes, while they can be noisy and chaotic, the end result is usually a huge net positive for the surrounding area! Not to mention, capping the tracks here greatly increases access for everyone in and out of the Museum District, which I believe is an incredibly good thing, regardless of what's actually built atop the cap itself!

Aaron (Glowrock)
__________________
"Deeply corrupt but still semi-functional - it's the Chicago way." -- Barrelfish
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13949  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 9:20 PM
mcdj mcdj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by gandalf612 View Post
Sorry, but there should be no expectation of having a quiet suburban enclave in the downtown of the third largest city in the US.
Which is why I specifically didn’t move into downtown. I moved to Near South Side.

Quote:
Originally Posted by woodrow View Post
Welcome to the forum! Of course, you just want to NIMBY away and ignore the difference of opinions of some of the forumers, but YAY FOR YOU!
Sorry, what part of me asking the person I replied to, and the people who are jumping up and down for joy at renderings, what benefits they see in this project, is ignoring differences of opinions? I’m literally asking for viewpoints on how people see this as good. Or is the thinking here that any and all development is inherently good as soon as theyre announced, no questions asked?

I love how Chicago builds stuff, lets it sit half finished for years, trickles in a few crappy street level tenants (can we please have some more dental centers and foot clinics?) while leaving the entire surrounding area littered with old/empty buildings and weed covered lots, then just moves on to the next project. And the people are like woo hoo!

My neighborhood has been “up and coming” for 20 years.

Last edited by mcdj; Mar 14, 2019 at 11:20 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13950  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 9:36 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
The Mill - 1375 Fulton - Gr333n - Wolf Point E

March 6

__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13951  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 9:37 PM
mcdj mcdj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
You give no valid reason for opposing a zoning change that permits this project other than "I don't want to live next to a construction site"
Ok, I also don’t want to be flanked by two major pedestrian corridors that access a transit hub, and watch the neighborhood go from neighborhood to footraffic superhighway, with all the trash, noise and crime that brings.

I also want to know what the project means for real estate values for the current residents.

I also want to know what environmental impact the project will have on Northerly Island and Burnham Harbor. And the air I breathe.

I also want see how the construction trucks get to the site, despite the ban on trucks on the LSD and the promise from the developer that trucks would not be coming from the west.

I also want to know how the CFD, CPD, and the schools will scale up for the onslaught of thousands of new tenants crammed into a sliver of dirt.

I also want to know why we need ANOTHER “mixed use” project, when we have Soldier Fileld, Wintrust, the outdoor concert venue at Northerly Island, and McCormick place in the same spot. They’re even using the Soldier Fileld parking lot most of this summer for Cirque Du Soleil.

They’re describing the mixed uses spaces as a destination place. But it’s just gonna be another 5 Lettuce Entertain You/Boka restaurants, a Whole Fools, and a movie theater/concert space, because there are none of any of that anywhere else.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13952  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 9:43 PM
OrdoSeclorum OrdoSeclorum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdj View Post
Which is why I specifically didn’t move into downtown. I moved to Near South Side.

I'm literally asking for viewpoints on how people see this as good.
If it's a comfortable walk to the 2nd busiest rail station in the country and the third largest office building in the country, I'm pretty sure everyone would consider this to be "downtown". Berwyn is not "downtown." The near south side is not "the Loop", but it's downtown.

As for what the benefits are: it would be nice to have those ugly tracks covered. It would be nice to walk across those tracks more easily. It would be nice to have more neighbors who can keep eyes on the streets and patronize local businesses and activate the street. It would fun to have the south end of the park framed in by high rises for the exact same reason I enjoy the north end of Grant park being framed by high rises. It would be nice to create more apartment supply so that our cost of living doesn't increase due to supply constraints that would make Chicago less affordable. It would be nice to have more people living within walking distance of the Loop, making the Loop a more appealing place to recruit employees and thus making the whole region more prosperous. It would be nice have a tax base increased by thousands of units so we can all share more high quality services. It would be nice to have increased density close to where our infrastructure is most concentrated so that it can be utilized more efficiently, increasing regional prosperity.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13953  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 9:45 PM
VKChaz VKChaz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California
Posts: 665
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
^ Those ornamented archways are a pleasant surprise!

Was this a rehab or a new construction? If the latter, then that's a nice little touch
I believe those are replicas from the demolished building. In fact, those might be the actual pieces that were saved. Still would rather have the original building (Holabird & Root, I believe), but it isn't bad. I hope the additional trim is still planned.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13954  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 10:15 PM
pilsenarch pilsenarch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdj View Post
Ok, I also don’t want to be flanked by two major pedestrian corridors that access a transit hub, and watch the neighborhood go from neighborhood to footraffic superhighway, with all the trash, noise and crime that brings.

I also want to know what the project means for real estate values for the current residents.

I also want to know what environmental impact the project will have on Northerly Island and Burnham Harbor. And the air I breathe.

I also want see how the construction trucks get to the site, despite the ban on trucks on the LSD and the promise from the developer that trucks would not be coming from the west.

I also want to know how the CFD, CPD, and the schools will scale up for the onslaught of thousands of new tenants crammed into a sliver of dirt.

I also want to know why we need ANOTHER “mixed use” project, when we have Soldier Fileld, Wintrust, the outdoor concert venue at Northerly Island, and McCormick place in the same spot. They’re even using the Soldier Fileld parking lot most of this summer for Cirque Du Soleil.

They’re describing the mixed uses spaces as a destination place. But it’s just gonna be another 5 Lettuce Entertain You/Boka restaurants, a Whole Fools, and a movie theater/concert space, because there are none of any of that anywhere else.
Wow. You've got to give it up. Dude, you are on a SKYSCRAPER forum full of enthusiasts that want nothing better than to see this city grow and become ever more denser. So, you're wasting your typing. ('Sliver of dirt'? HA! it is 35 acres!)

And for all of my FELLOW FORUMERS who believe that this will never happen...

IT WILL HAPPEN.

It's just a matter of how long it will take.

There might be a lot of land to build on in Chicago, but there is NO LAND TO BUILD ON this close to the CBD AND on the lakefront.

This land represents a VERY finite resource, and for that reason, it is extremely valuable and its development is inevitable...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13955  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 10:29 PM
mcdj mcdj is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilsenarch View Post
Wow. You've got to give it up. Dude, you are on a SKYSCRAPER forum full of enthusiasts that want nothing better than to see this city grow and become ever more denser. So, you're wasting your typing. ('Sliver of dirt'? HA! it is 35 acres!)

And for all of my FELLOW FORUMERS who believe that this will never happen...

IT WILL HAPPEN.

It's just a matter of how long it will take.

There might be a lot of land to build on in Chicago, but there is NO LAND TO BUILD ON this close to the CBD AND on the lakefront.

This land represents a VERY finite resource, and for that reason, it is extremely valuable and its development is inevitable...
Ok I’ll be moving along.

Every time I navigate a page here my iPad gets hijacked by CONGRATULATIONS APPLE USER! ads anyhow.

FYI, a city can be a city without being wall to wall density. And be careful what you wish for. NYC has the density you seem to covet and living there is mayhem.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13956  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 10:44 PM
OrdoSeclorum OrdoSeclorum is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 590
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdj View Post
NYC has the density you seem to covet and living there is mayhem.
I feel that most of Manhattan, at about 70,000 people per square mile, is overdense. But I really like Paris, Brooklyn and London at half that density, which is about twice Chicago's density. If Chicago quadruples our population to about 11 million people, please stop in again for a follow up discussion so we can re-asses.

Fun fact! Cicero, IL is the 7th density city over 75,000 people in the U.S.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13957  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 10:57 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
210 N Carpenter

March 6



March 10

__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13958  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 10:57 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,393
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcdj View Post
Ok, I also don’t want to be flanked by two major pedestrian corridors that access a transit hub, and watch the neighborhood go from neighborhood to footraffic superhighway, with all the trash, noise and crime that brings.
First, except on game/concert days, it's unlikely that even 3000 people will pass to or from that hub each day. It simply doesn't serve any big origins or destinations. But a central city is indeed a place that brings a variety of people together, not all of whom live on your block. For hundreds of years, we've coped with that reality using techniques like garden fences, living spaces a half-floor above grade, or doorman buildings.

Quote:
I also want to know what the project means for real estate values for the current residents.
That they'll go up. Remember that developers only build projects like this for the high end of the market. The more such people we have living in the South Loop, the less we're seen as some iffy urban pioneer area.

Quote:
I also want to know what environmental impact the project will have on Northerly Island and Burnham Harbor. And the air I breathe.
Nothing noticeable, except some more people who'll get to look at them. If autos were to stop getting cleaner, theoretically the couple thousand new trips at buildout could have a nonzero impact on air quality. But it's easy to see that internal-combustion engines will only be a fraction of the vehicles on the road when this is even half done.

Quote:
I also want see how the construction trucks get to the site, despite the ban on trucks on the LSD and the promise from the developer that trucks would not be coming from the west.
CDOT simply issues permits for the construction trucks to use LSD, as they do for any other lakefront construction project.

Quote:
I also want to know how the CFD, CPD, and the schools will scale up for the onslaught of thousands of new tenants crammed into a sliver of dirt.
CFD will send a truck when someone burns the toast, just as they do today in Museum Park. CPD will send a squadrol when one of the residents goes off her meds, just as they do today in Museum Park. Have those trips been so frequent in your experience that they've made the area unliveable? As for schools, highrises don't tend to have many school-age children. Because this development will have thousands of square feet in building bases to fill, it very well may be the spot for the new neighborhood high school we all want.

Quote:
I also want to know why we need ANOTHER “mixed use” project, when we have Soldier Fileld, Wintrust, the outdoor concert venue at Northerly Island, and McCormick place in the same spot. They’re even using the Soldier Fileld parking lot most of this summer for Cirque Du Soleil.
I'm not sure what you mean. No event venue was discussed last night.

Quote:
They’re describing the mixed uses spaces as a destination place. But it’s just gonna be another 5 Lettuce Entertain You/Boka restaurants, a Whole Fools, and a movie theater/concert space, because there are none of any of that anywhere else.
Could be. I'm not optimistic about an indoor mall, and real restaurant rows form on streets like Wabash with small funky spaces. But in this country, we tend to let property owners take the risk that they may not get the tenancy they want, rather than have a Ministry of Retail that decides if new retail space is justified.

Hey, at least you didn't mention your views. There are things I don't like about this site plan, and there are big doubts about it ever happening. But "the neighborhood won't be exactly the same forever" is a pretty weak objection. You knew when you moved in that Central Station owned the air rights, and it doesn't take a genius to figure out that building over Weldon Yard would require high density.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13959  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 11:04 PM
harryc's Avatar
harryc harryc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Oak Park, Il
Posts: 14,941
200 N Green

March 10

__________________
Harry C - Urbanize Chicago- My Flickr stream HRC_OakPark
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. B Franklin.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13960  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 11:09 PM
emathias emathias is offline
Adoptive Chicagoan
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: River North, Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 5,150
Quote:
I also want to know why we need ANOTHER “mixed use” project, when we have Soldier Fileld, Wintrust, the outdoor concert venue at Northerly Island, and McCormick place in the same spot. They’re even using the Soldier Fileld parking lot most of this summer for Cirque Du Soleil.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Downtown View Post
...
I'm not sure what you mean. No event venue was discussed last night.
...
It appears he's conflating "mixed use" with the idea that it may have "destination" elements. Obviously "mixed use" doesn't have to include destination businesses.

Mcdj: Mixed use just means creating an area that isn't exclusively residential or exclusively retail or exclusively office, etc. If you like cities, you probably want and prefer mixed use even if you haven't associated the term with the kind of neighborhood you want. If you don't like cities then, well, you'd have been an idiot for living where you do. And I doubt you're an idiot.

Edit: I've lived literally surrounded by construction for most of the past five years (check out what's been constructed near the block of Huron between LaSalle and Wells in the recent past to get an idea). I love how it's changed the area for the better.
__________________
[SIZE="1"]I like travel and photography - check out my [URL="https://www.flickr.com/photos/ericmathiasen/"]Flickr page[/URL].
CURRENT GEAR: Nikon Z6, Nikon Z 14-30mm f4 S, Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S, Nikon 50mm f1.4G
STOLEN GEAR: (during riots of 5/30/2020) Nikon D750, Nikon 14-24mm F2.8G, Nikon 85mm f1.8G, Nikon 50mm f1.4D
[/SIZE]

Last edited by emathias; Mar 15, 2019 at 12:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:52 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.