HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3421  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 4:15 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ Man, if all that was destined to happen with the atrium area between the towers was a single storey big box, I wonder why it couldn't have happened decades ago. Even though it's not the multistorey hotel that was originally envisioned for that site, it's such an improvement already.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3422  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 4:24 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 16,385
Sweet live feed. Next page.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonaldSmith View Post
Live feed:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3423  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 4:24 PM
OTA in Winnipeg OTA in Winnipeg is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,798
Cam - three views:

https://300main.ca/livecam/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3424  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 5:15 PM
dmacc dmacc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,712
With this live feed my life is finally complete.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3425  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 5:19 PM
dmacc dmacc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,712
All together now





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3426  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 5:30 PM
mitchellk12's Avatar
mitchellk12 mitchellk12 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 677
great progress shots. Hope to see those same angles for the whole project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3427  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 6:53 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 16,385
What exactly will be going in the in-between area? A grocery store was proposed, but I don't remember hearing anything more.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3428  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 7:40 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,946
Another quick and dirty.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3429  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 7:51 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ It looks very skinny from that angle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3430  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 8:02 PM
Luisito's Avatar
Luisito Luisito is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,899
Skinny is good. Nice pics!

I hope something 150m+ eventually goes up on those lots on Graham.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3431  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 8:53 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,946
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ It looks very skinny from that angle.
Remember that is just my quick interpretation....not an official architectural render.


Pretty close though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3432  
Old Posted Mar 13, 2019, 9:40 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 3,285
Hydro sure loves to provide a place for construction cams to be positioned
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3433  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 11:30 AM
wags_in_the_peg's Avatar
wags_in_the_peg wags_in_the_peg is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ It looks very skinny from that angle.

The tower is just the elevator shaft, or are you talking about the “middle” rumoured fitness place?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3434  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 3:54 PM
Wolf13 Wolf13 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
Heard Artis is telling potential 300 Main retail tenants that they prob won’t get possession til 2022 now and should target spring 2023 for openings.
That makes no sense...

Either way, other than the restaurant there are only so many retail spaces in 300, and that number seems to be off by a year or so.

As far as 330, well, I talked to the staff in their Portage location and they said they expect to be in next year around this time, meaning that the builder has to turn the spec over to them before year's end.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
I would think that time frame might be inaccurate. At latest, I could see the 330 part ready for occupancy in 2020. I can imagine that Artis is going to want paying tenants in their as soon as possible.

I am not trying to argue with you, just applying common sense. It will be enclosed within a couple of months, then even if you give an arguably long time for base building fit up (1 year) that only takes you to 2020.
Exactly this is what I'm thinking
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kris22 View Post
Another new tallest after this one would be great but I imagine it would have to be a condo tower, and is there really a market for a SkyCity-sized building? I think that one stalled somewhere in the 50 percent sold range after several years? 390 On the River isn't selling like hot cakes right now either, and there are plenty of 3-4 storey condos popping up all around downtown that are literally a 5 minute drive to the city centre so I imagine that also takes some of the clientele away.

A new tallest apartment tower after 300 Main seems like it would be many years away, once the market absorbs all those new units, plus TNS rentals, plus the many rental conversions happening (Medical Arts, the building on smith, the fairly steady exchange district conversions).

I don't know much about the office market but from what I understand from reading on this forum a new tallest office tower seems totally unrealistic.

In the end I expect a bunch of 15-25 storey buildings which tbh is totally fine with me. Depending on their location, they can add quite a bit to the skyline. For example, I notice 390 On the River popping up in many views of downtown.
We'll have to wait and see if condos make a comeback, but for now I think Apartments are still the stronger market...

Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
^ Man, if all that was destined to happen with the atrium area between the towers was a single storey big box, I wonder why it couldn't have happened decades ago. Even though it's not the multistorey hotel that was originally envisioned for that site, it's such an improvement already.
That's the burn, eh? I was told that to everyone's knowledge, it was always strong enough to accommodate a hotel as per original vision. So nobody was gonna waste a box on a hotel location.

Only in the design stages was it verified that the foundations built were far less than what was promised by the original developer, and could only hand 1 story anyway.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3435  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 4:02 PM
Spocket's Avatar
Spocket Spocket is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,622
I feel it needs to be stated that SkyCity doesn't make for any sort of thermometer on the state of condo desirability in Winnipeg. It stalled around %50 but that's after it became apparent that the company wasn't particularly above-board. Other condos have sold and they tell us much more about the viability of such projects in Winnipeg.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3436  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 5:15 PM
dmacc dmacc is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,712
^^^ Yup, who's to say that 50% is accurate, nothing that developer did was above board. I have no idea how well the other condo towers built downtown recently sold. I would consider buying one if it were connected to the sky walk... or not. I would be a bit nervous because there are a lot of apartments going up and renting out a condo in a saturated market could be tough.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3437  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 5:21 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Had SkyCity taken the form of a 30 storey condo tower by a legitimate developer, it probably would have been built by now...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3438  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 5:29 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 16,385
It looks like there should be a second story along the Main St side. They placed hollow core in that area, which typically means something will be using that as floor space. Maybe outdoor area? I don't know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3439  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 5:38 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 9,946
I think that SkyCity has hurt both D-Condo and Glasshouse. Glasshouse was first to market and likely had some trepidation from new condo buyers to highrise living in a busy part of downtown. Then came D-Condo which had issues of it's own that hurt it's sales. SkyCity came on the scene and I think really wowed everyone and likely drew some potential buyers from both D and Glasshouse.

When SkyCity turned out to have shady developers and ultimately fell through i'm sure it has hurt the uptake on the other two. You would think that (if you believe it to be true) - even a portion of the reported 200 pre-sold buyers in SkyCity would have no problem buying a unit in either of the already built condo towers...which would be enough to fill them up.

So not only do we end up with a gravel parking lot...still, I think SkyCity hurt the outlook of the prospective downtown condo buyers market.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3440  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2019, 8:09 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
It looks like there should be a second story along the Main St side. They placed hollow core in that area, which typically means something will be using that as floor space. Maybe outdoor area? I don't know.
Isn't that Earls?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:06 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.