HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #12021  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2019, 10:12 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
[QUOTE=JHikka;8498219]Nothing about the conversion from BRT to LRT has been easy. Other Ottawa users can speak to this if they like but in my opinion it would be easier to just build LRT outright rather than build BRT, wait twenty or thirty years, and then change it to LRT. It's been a long couple of years of bus rerouting, construction delays, and the costs are getting higher and higher. This is beside the fact that once LRT begins it requires urban residents to transfer more frequently than they had to under the BRT-only system. Also also beside the fact is that Stage 2 is primarily further servicing suburban residents at the expense of inner-city residents.

The only upside is that the right-of-way is somewhat reserved already for Stage 2 and most of the stations are already pre-existing in location.[/QUOTE]

I don't understand why this is a plus for Stage 2 when 95% of the Ottawa forumers (including you in this post) say that the old Transitway was totally useless when it came to building Stage 1.

I realize that Stage 1 had a major tunnel component downtown which was built from scratch but aside from that to the east and west of downtown Stage 2 has pretty similar pros and cons (in terms of what it inherits from the Transitway) as Stage 1 did.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #12022  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2019, 10:56 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
Nothing about the conversion from BRT to LRT has been easy. Other Ottawa users can speak to this if they like but in my opinion it would be easier to just build LRT outright rather than build BRT, wait twenty or thirty years, and then change it to LRT. It's been a long couple of years of bus rerouting, construction delays, and the costs are getting higher and higher. This is beside the fact that once LRT begins it requires urban residents to transfer more frequently than they had to under the BRT-only system. Also also beside the fact is that Stage 2 is primarily further servicing suburban residents at the expense of inner-city residents.

The only upside is that the right-of-way is somewhat reserved already for Stage 2 and most of the stations are already pre-existing in location.[
I don't understand why this is a plus for Stage 2 when 95% of the Ottawa forumers (including you in this post) say that the old Transitway was totally useless when it came to building Stage 1.

I realize that Stage 1 had a major tunnel component downtown which was built from scratch but aside from that to the east and west of downtown Stage 2 has pretty similar pros and cons (in terms of what it inherits from the Transitway) as Stage 1 did.
1. ROW. It's easier on public consciousness and acceptance if you're building a new line (LRT) physically in place of an old line (BRT). The difficulties around things like land acquisition, demolition, and other movements are already primarily taken care of.

2. With stations already pre-existing it allows for easy shifting from BRT to LRT. People already know where the stations are and, similar to the first point, don't need to be constructed in new areas altogether. The Orchard station is a point of contention because it's a new location and in/near a greenspace area, so it's facing some difficulty in design. Compare this to a currently existing station that simply needs to be upgraded (Dominion, or Westboro, etc.) and you'll see the difference.

Did I say the Transitway was useless for building Stage 1? It's useful to some degree (the points above) but the conversion from BRT to LRT is such a hassle regarding bus routing, delays, etc. that it's easier to just build LRT outright rather than bothering with BRT at all. I'm speaking in regards to forty years ago or whenever the Transitway was created.

I do have issues with the Transitway as a whole but it's 50/50 on pros and cons moving to LRT. Could be better but could be worse.
     
     
  #12023  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2019, 2:29 PM
Reecemartin's Avatar
Reecemartin Reecemartin is offline
YouTube Creator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 1,776
Video tour of Montreal’s Canora!

https://youtu.be/nDIR94x2v3k
     
     
  #12024  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2019, 3:41 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,505
Trillium Line train crossing the Rideau River from Carelton University. The line carrying about 18,000 per day will be shut-down for two years for extensions and upgrades.


https://twitter.com/otrainfans613/status/1104508965617053698

Tunney's Station


https://twitter.com/carbonfixated/status/1104416922865754112

Cyrville Station








https://twitter.com/LEGOGuyCA/status/1104058007246327809




https://twitter.com/LEGOGuyCA/status/1104056555861917696

Rideau (2), uOttawa (1) and Lees (1)








https://twitter.com/MathieuFleury/status/1104736193584029698

Parliament Station




https://twitter.com/otrainfans613/status/1103350327439491073

Last edited by J.OT13; Mar 11, 2019 at 1:22 PM. Reason: Double posted one image.
     
     
  #12025  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2019, 12:56 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,505
Parliament Station entrance, corner of Queen and O'Connor.


https://twitter.com/jesse_helmer/status/1103793402439757825
     
     
  #12026  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2019, 2:54 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,971
City receives funding for Valley and Metro Line LRT expansion
March 11, 2019

The City of Edmonton is one step closer to building two new light rail transit (LRT) extensions following a funding commitment from the federal and provincial governments today.

The Honourable François-Philippe Champagne, Minister of Infrastructure and Communities, Mr. Jon Carson, Member of the Legislative Assembly for Edmonton-Meadowlark, and His Worship Don Iveson, Mayor of Edmonton, announced a combined investment of over $2 billion in both the Valley Line West and the Metro Line Northwest LRT projects.

“Edmonton is one of Canada’s fastest growing cities, and we are planning and building our city with this growth in mind. We are undertaking the most ambitious expansion of our LRT network in our history so we can grow smart and sustainably, and keep more than a million people moving,” said Mayor Iveson. “Today's announcement is a true representation of partnership between all levels of government, a partnership that is needed in order to continue to make valuable investments like these that will benefit the generations to come.”

The Government of Canada is providing over $1 billion for both projects through the Investing in Canada Infrastructure Plan, including approximately $948 million for the Valley Line West LRT and approximately $127 million for the Metro Line Northwest LRT.

The Government of Alberta reaffirmed its commitment of approximately $1.17 billion towards both projects through the Climate Leadership Plan, including approximately $1.04 billion for the Valley Line West LRT and approximately $131 million for the first phase of the Metro Line Northwest LRT.

“Today’s funding commitments will allow the City to move forward with our plans to bring light rail transit to west and northwest Edmonton,” said Linda Cochrane, City Manager, City of Edmonton. “These projects are a major step in growing our LRT network, creating another transportation option for thousands of Edmontonians and providing better connections to where people live, work and play.”

With federal and provincial funding in place, the City can finalize its municipal funding requirements for both projects and bring them to City Council for consideration this spring. The City can also move forward with procuring the contractors that will extend the Valley Line by 14 kilometres from downtown to Lewis Farms in west Edmonton, and the Metro Line by 1.5 kilometres from NAIT into Blatchford.

It will take about one year to select a contractor for the Valley Line West LRT project, and another five to six years to complete construction. It will take about one year to complete design and select a contractor for the Metro Line Northwest LRT extension into Blatchford, and another four years to complete construction and commissioning. Construction on both projects is anticipated to begin as early as 2020.


For more information:
edmonton.ca/valleylinewest
edmonton.ca/metronw

Media contact:
Lindsay Yarmon
Senior Communications Advisor
Integrated Infrastructure Services
780-496-8191
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #12027  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2019, 5:23 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,638
^ That's great news! Glad to see this investment come to fruition.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis
     
     
  #12028  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2019, 6:19 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,971
City-wide LRT by 2040 is the goal and it certainly looks like we will hit it.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #12029  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 1:30 AM
GeneralLea's Avatar
GeneralLea GeneralLea is offline
Midtowner since 2K
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Midtown Toronto
Posts: 5,955
Wow, Edmonton is really going by with rail construction.

Love seeing the Ottawa updates, I recall seeing the construction much earlier on nearly two years ago.
__________________
"Living life on the edge"
     
     
  #12030  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 2:59 AM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by SFUVancouver View Post
^ That's great news! Glad to see this investment come to fruition.
And by total coincidence right before an election!
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
     
     
  #12031  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 3:32 AM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,971
Funny how that works...
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #12032  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 5:48 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,505
Video posted on the Ottawa Forum. Confederation Line train testing by the University of Ottawa from 9:30 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. last Friday. This stretch of the line is between Lees and uOttawa stations.

I think I count 16 singles and 1 double (1:42). When in service, double trains will be used on weekdays.

Video Link


For those interested, you can take a virtual tour of a Confederation Line train down here:

http://www.octranspo.com/ready4rail/new_vehicles#train360
     
     
  #12033  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 6:55 AM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
City-wide LRT by 2040 is the goal and it certainly looks like we will hit it.
Is there a definition of what that means? Like every house has to be within x km of a station or something?
     
     
  #12034  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 9:19 AM
accord1999 accord1999 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6 View Post
And by total coincidence right before an election!
And most of it isn't even new money; the Federal Government had already promised $878M to Edmonton for infrastructure last April:

Quote:
It’s enough to get Edmonton’s west LRT built, plus contribute to other transit priorities. That includes helping downtown Edmonton convert to district energy and investing in electric buses, said Mayor Don Iveson after the formal contract was signed between Alberta Infrastructure Minister Sandra Jansen and federal Infrastructure and Communities Minister Amarjeet Sohi.
https://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-n...-billion-in-federal-infrastructure-funds

But like with the Calgary Green Line, the various levels of Governments will probably announce the same money several times.
     
     
  #12035  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 1:21 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Is there a definition of what that means? Like every house has to be within x km of a station or something?

https://www.edmonton.ca/documents/RoadsTraffic/LRTNetworkMap2017.jpeg
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #12036  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 7:23 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
So no then? That looks comparable to Calgary with the Green Line, and vast swaths of the cities will still have no access to LRT, so I do not accept that either will have 'city wide LRT'.
     
     
  #12037  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 7:36 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 68,971
For all intents and purposes, in a mid-sized western American city, that is 'city-wide'.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #12038  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 8:00 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Then it's a meaningless promise.
     
     
  #12039  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 8:07 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,505
Edmonton's plan is quite impressive. The central area seems well served by multiple lines and most suburban communities will have nearby access to transit service. We can't expect every corner of the city be served by rapid transit. Even Toronto and Vancouver are far from achieving this. Only Montreal will be relatively close once the REM opens.

Here's Ottawa's roughly 2040 plan. Very suburban centric. Dashed lines are BRT; the diagonal one between the thick red and green lines is an existing fully grade separated BRT while the straight one left of that will be street level BRT. Notice how only one rail line goes through downtown. Everyone else will have to transfer onto already packed trains.

Gatineau to the north, representing 25% of the metropolitan population, is served by a BRT line headed north/east and is planning a two branch surface LRT line to the west.


https://twitter.com/JimWatsonOttawa/status/1099023471156199430

Not trying to take away too much from Ottawa's plan. Ours is fully grade separated and more than doubles the capacity of what are currently the busiest corridors. It is needed to improve reliability and entice more suburbanites to leave their cars. But what is sorely lacking in Ottawa is a serious conversation on how to best serve the densest areas of the City such as the Rideau-Montreal and Bank corridors.
     
     
  #12040  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2019, 8:14 PM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
ARTchitecture
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cala Ghearraidh
Posts: 22,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
What are these in kilometer length?
__________________
Strong & Free

Mohkínstsis — 1.6 million people at the Foothills of the Rocky Mountains, 400 high-rises, a 300-metre SE to NW climb, over 1000 kilometres of pathways, with 20% of the urban area as parkland.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:06 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.