Quote:
Originally Posted by UV4EVER
I'd like to see a real study done on the pros and cons (taxes, efficiencies, representation, etc) of changing up some of the local county and city governments. I think we have a couple of good options that could really serve the people better for what they want. Some options that could be explored:
-Merging all of Salt Lake County into a single consolidated city-county
-Splitting Salt Lake County into two counties
-Annexing some of the cities around Salt Lake City into a single consolidated city-county
Personally, I think a mix of some of these options would probably give most people more of what they want. Maybe a new county could be formed with cities from Southern Salt Lake County and Northern Utah County and then the cities in Northern Salt Lake County could merge into a single city-county government. That would give Salt Lake City around 400-600,000 people who want more of united, large-city focus while the new county could have around 400-600,000 for people who want small cities and suburbs.
Maybe we could start a Change.Org initiative.
|
If people don't want all of SLCO merged into one city because of ideological differences between the north and south, a good option would be to merge SLC, SSL, Millcreek, Murray, Holiday, Midvale, Kearns, Magna, WVC and possibly Cottonwood Heights into a city of approximately 650,000.
And then merge SoJo, Riverton, Herriman, Bluffdale, Draper, Sandy West Jordan*, Taylorsville* and White City into a city of 500,000.
Those two cities would be the 25th and 35th largest cities in the country. Instead of having the largest city in the state being the 116th largest city in the country.
*WJ and Taylorsville are a bit of grey areas for me. I'm not sure which way they lean politically.