Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Roboto
Good luck with that Pritzker. Not sure it's worth the effort though. The tax incentives they want is insane and all of us in this state should be against billions in corporate welfare for the richest douchbag in the world. I fault to see how 20000 jobs is worth shelling out giveaways like that, especially with the state budget as it is. Make that prick earn it or find some other sucker.
|
The vast majority, if not all, of the incentives are in the form of either limited tax exemptions or promises of infrastructure investment. Infrastructure investment, even when it primarily or disproportionately benefits one company, benefits everyone. Tax exemptions aren't dollars taken from the treasury, just dollars not collected for the treasury. In other words, tax exemptions only benefit the company if they actually set up business here - the is no up front cost, and no money lost out-of-pocket if they leave or fail.
And 20,000 jobs that pay an average of $100,000/year, which isn't a crazy estimate, means $2 billion per year into the Chicago metro area payrolls annually. That's nearly $100 million per year into state individual income tax collections. Plus, a huge chunk of that two billion gets spent locally, which supports additional jobs, which results in additional income tax collections, etc, etc. And then there's the jobs a headquarters-sized office supports outside of it's payroll for supplies and outsourced services and ordered-in food and construction and building operations, etc. And if even a quarter of the employees are transplants, that's maybe 10,000 new residents (counting family members), which helps support the housing market and related jobs.
This isn't some zero sum game. It's also not Chicago just hanging cash to a billionaire, it's a region letting a company underpay taxes for a fixed amount of time as an investment in the future. As long as the numbers are approached similarly to how you decide whether to build a new bridge or a new highway, it's really no different as an investment except that a non-toll bridge never creates any direct income, only indirect investment return. An investment in a corporate relocation, properly structured, eventually results in direct income to the economy and tax rolls.