HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11521  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 6:02 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,959
Vaughn is like Brentwood or Coquitlam Centre...……… a McCity, just add money. They are relatively sterile and uninteresting and no matter how much politicians or developers like to claim, they are not `downtowns`.


That said, they are far preferable to towers being spread out all over the place. They make transit far more convenient and cost effective as all of these centres are on subway/SkyTrain lines. This also makes providing core government services such as schools, libraries, health facilities, community centresm etc more cost effective and more easily accessible particularly for those without cars or people who are mobility challenged like the elderly and disabled.
     
     
  #11522  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 6:34 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,068
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
New townhouses with no yard by Bathurst and 14th (or is it 16th?) In Richmond Hill are selling at a million when you can buy an older, smaller home but on a much bigger lot in the city for roughly the same. York Region is incredibly overvalued including Vaughan City Centre.
but isn't ford country where they are scared of downtown?
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #11523  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 12:16 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,865
York region has tons of very well paying jobs contributing to that, but yea, it's overvalued. Especially northern York region like Newmarket.

I think a lot have to remember that only 20% of employment is actually downtowns - while many (most?) on this board are part of that 20%, the vast majority of people's or work elsewhere - and that means they look to live elsewhere too.

I know VMC has been marketed as a place for students from York U as well. Lots of investors angling for student rentals I'm sure. It's sort of replaced NYCC in that role - a lot of condos in that area were built on that idea.
     
     
  #11524  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 1:41 PM
isaidso isaidso is online now
North of Gilead
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North of Gilead
Posts: 11,067
What's happening in Vaughan is a great example of the direction the GGH is heading overall. We'll end up with 10-15 nodes and the whole region will become de-centralized. People in Vaughan will live, work, shop, find entertainment, and go to school in Vaughan. The proportion of people who take trips to downtown Toronto for one or all of these things will go down.
__________________
ELBOWS UP CANADA, ELBOWS UP UKRAINE, ELBOWS UP GREENLAND
CANADA, EUROPE, NZ, AUSTRALIA, JAPAN, MEXICO STRONG

US REPUBLICANS/MAGA/ICE NOT WELCOME HERE, STAY OUT
     
     
  #11525  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 1:55 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
The region is highly decentralized. Vaughan City Centre and other "downtown" plans in York and Durham are working towards centralization however in generic masterplans of needlessly tall towers next to townhouse blocks. The scale is all over the place and really doesn't live up to the rationale of providing different types of housing units. You're either paying a high premium to rent or are an owner in a 500 plus unit corporation.
     
     
  #11526  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 2:09 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
York region has tons of very well paying jobs contributing to that, but yea, it's overvalued. Especially northern York region like Newmarket.

I think a lot have to remember that only 20% of employment is actually downtowns - while many (most?) on this board are part of that 20%, the vast majority of people's or work elsewhere - and that means they look to live elsewhere too.

I know VMC has been marketed as a place for students from York U as well. Lots of investors angling for student rentals I'm sure. It's sort of replaced NYCC in that role - a lot of condos in that area were built on that idea.
I know that. I'm looking at it from an investor point of view There are more options buying a small bungalow on a large lot on the fringes of the old city of Toronto than a new townhouse on the edge of Richmond Hill. There's been plenty of ups and downs already throughout the last 20 years and, in general, York Region has shown to be a lot more volatile than Toronto. I would get in and out as soon as possible buying there.

Vaughan City Centre is a dump. There's no justification for it to be priced the way it is because of a subway stop and one day, many years from now, it won't be a dump. That's just institutional investors and politicians are pulling the wool over newbies eyes through promises that are flat out lies.
     
     
  #11527  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 2:32 PM
niwell's Avatar
niwell niwell is offline
sick transit, gloria
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Roncesvalles, Toronto
Posts: 11,633
Yeah York Region is insanely overvalued - for some reason a Vaughan address is seen as desirable. One of the few cases where you can hop across Steeles and get substantially more for your money, with significantly lower property taxes to boot.

These massive towers would be somewhat more palatable if they were actually built with larger units in comparison to those in central Toronto. More along the lines of the 60s/70s tower blocks all over the inner-suburbs. Current level of disrepair notwithstanding you can actually fit a family in a 3 bedroom with those.

Of course that doesn't make economic sense right now so we're stuck with the worst of both worlds. And honestly the faux-urban townhouse / retail podium set back from extremely wide ROWs on Highway 7 and other collector streets may even be worse than the tower in the park design.

Markham's probably done the best job of the suburban master planned downtown's and even they seem to be abandoning the original intent of supplying housing at various scales.
__________________
Check out my pics of Johannesburg
     
     
  #11528  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 3:34 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,912
I only think York Region is overvalued for people like us (on SSP).

Proximity to downtown and urban charm are nice to have, but not crucial for a large portion of the population.

On the other hand, being in the centre-north of the GTA - a metro that sprawls predominantly east to west - and being straddled by the 407 - the only transportation corridor that actually moves at rush hour - means that York Region probably has the best accessibility to the greatest number of jobs in the GTA. This is huge if you’re a two income professional household.

The other thing is that York Region is/was settled by the affluent 1st and 2nd generation offspring of some of our most economically successful ethnic groups: Chinese, Jews, Persians and Italians. Even if the housing doesn’t scream affluence from outside appearances, these are still areas that cater and appeal to wealthier groups, with carrots like better schools, etc, that fetch higher prices.
     
     
  #11529  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 4:33 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
On the other hand, being in the centre-north of the GTA - a metro that sprawls predominantly east to west - and being straddled by the 407 - the only transportation corridor that actually moves at rush hour - means that York Region probably has the best accessibility to the greatest number of jobs in the GTA. This is huge if you’re a two income professional household.
The "world" of most people I know who live in the GTA is maybe 25% of the metropolitan area, not 100%. Which is to be expected given how costly it is to travel around there. If somebody finishes school and gets a job in Markham and they grew up in Richmond Hill, they're probably not going to want to commute from downtown Toronto. I like urban living and I would not do that.

Metro Vancouver has a similar phenomenon going on with the Fraser River.

I guess high costs are a perpetual complaint but while it is a bit clearer why not every young person can have a detached starter home in the GTA (limited transportation options and greenbelt), it is messed that up the only option (for the relatively well off) is a 600 square foot unit. It should be possible to build large, affordable highrise condos.
     
     
  #11530  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 4:38 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso View Post
What's happening in Vaughan is a great example of the direction the GGH is heading overall. We'll end up with 10-15 nodes and the whole region will become de-centralized. People in Vaughan will live, work, shop, find entertainment, and go to school in Vaughan. The proportion of people who take trips to downtown Toronto for one or all of these things will go down.
Even in Metrotown, where there is now over 30 000 people living in an area the size of the West End, there still is not a demand for office space. Vacancy rates are high in the suburbs, very low downtown. Even in New York City you don’t see a lot of office development outside of Manhattan (I know Brooklyn has a bit of a dt going). It’s nice in theory to have live/work scenario, but I don’t see it happening.
     
     
  #11531  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 5:17 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,892
Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck View Post
I only think York Region is overvalued for people like us (on SSP).

Proximity to downtown and urban charm are nice to have, but not crucial for a large portion of the population.

On the other hand, being in the centre-north of the GTA - a metro that sprawls predominantly east to west - and being straddled by the 407 - the only transportation corridor that actually moves at rush hour - means that York Region probably has the best accessibility to the greatest number of jobs in the GTA. This is huge if you’re a two income professional household.

The other thing is that York Region is/was settled by the affluent 1st and 2nd generation offspring of some of our most economically successful ethnic groups: Chinese, Jews, Persians and Italians. Even if the housing doesn’t scream affluence from outside appearances, these are still areas that cater and appeal to wealthier groups, with carrots like better schools, etc, that fetch higher prices.
Most professionals in York Region will have kids and there's not much of a reason to have two incomes anymore. You get taxed to oblivion and earn too much to now get any federal subsidies for child care in return.

Insertnamehere brought it up already. Vaughan Centre is being sold with the usual shady guaranteed returns after 5 years but, also as a place to rent to students. That could happen but, why would you want to rent a brand new place with standard condo finishes (not cheap or durable) to students?
     
     
  #11532  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2019, 11:05 PM
Djesus777 Djesus777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: L.A
Posts: 461
Maestria- Montreal: A lot taller than we thought (198m/185m)
https://ville.montreal.qc.ca/documents/A...Vma_ODJ_LPP_ORDI_2019-02-12_18h30_FR.pdf (pg 1210-40 ish)






     
     
  #11533  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2019, 4:28 AM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,074
Maestria (198 / 185 m. - 58 / 55 storeys)









     
     
  #11534  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2019, 5:01 AM
Hawrylyshyn's Avatar
Hawrylyshyn Hawrylyshyn is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Ontario
Posts: 2,275
New tallest for Hamilton - 59, 54 and 48 floors

Funny part is it’s not even downtown, but in the suburbs beside the QEW where ridiculous height restrictions don’t apply

Quote:
Originally Posted by LRTfan View Post
     
     
  #11535  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2019, 11:40 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hawrylyshyn View Post
New tallest for Hamilton - 59, 54 and 48 floors

Funny part is it’s not even downtown, but in the suburbs beside the QEW where ridiculous height restrictions don’t apply
Oh my god....the horror.
     
     
  #11536  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2019, 1:21 AM
O-tacular's Avatar
O-tacular O-tacular is offline
Fake News
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Posts: 26,133
Great Montreal proposal but that Hamilton one is horrific!
     
     
  #11537  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2019, 8:00 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,918
That's an insane Montreal proposal. I never expected anything over 150m on those lots.
     
     
  #11538  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2019, 8:09 PM
ericmacm's Avatar
ericmacm ericmacm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: SW Ontario
Posts: 974
Fantastic Montreal proposal. I'm really liking what is being proposed in Montreal these days. Recent proposals such as Victoria sur le Parc, the new National Bank HQ, and now Maestria, all look incredible.
__________________
Opinions expressed here are solely my own.

Come See My Work: Pan-Canadian Skylines Project​​​ | Astrophotography Thread
     
     
  #11539  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2019, 3:53 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Djesus777 View Post
Maestria- Montreal: A lot taller than we thought (198m/185m)


What did we originally think it would be?
     
     
  #11540  
Old Posted Feb 11, 2019, 5:19 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
What did we originally think it would be?
At first it was reckoned to be 2 towers in the 145m and 65m range. Then more recently we thought It'd be more like 168m. Now we know it's basically two towers: one the height of PVM and the other the height of le 1250.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:20 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.