Quote:
Originally Posted by Uhuniau
It's where the transit line crosses that street. This is a common principle in naming stations on transit line. If it causes "confusion" for some people, that's their problem for being dumb.
|
There are a lot of cases where people are just illogical or sometimes "dumb", but this isn't one of them. We can't expect everyone to know every street in the city or even be able to identify all major streets on a map.
Cleary is a minor street. I'd wager the majority of people don't know where it is. Even looking at a map with the station name displayed, it's still not obvious. Same with New Orchard. I had to Google it a few times when they proposed that station, and I'm fairly well versed in the layout of the entire region.
McKellar Park and Ambleside are better know. When you talk to a friend or a co-worker, an acquaintance, they might mention the neighborhood they live it, but not that minor street next to the station. A tourist visiting the city will know more neighborhoods than streets.
So yes, name stations for major cross streets, especially if that street has a low potential of ever crossing another transit line or hosting one itself. But when a station serves a minor street, better name it for the neighborhood, which is also common practice BTW. When a station is named for a neighborhood, you see that neighborhood. The look, the feel, the surroundings. You know it. An unknown minor street doesn't capture the imagination. .